Personally, I like the look of MTGSalvation, because I'm used to MTGS - you know, it follows; as opposed to MTG Salvation and MTGS (OMG, where did that space go?).
I think while both are tolerable, it's much better to have consistency throughout the wiki; which is why I'm asking right here, right now.
Thanks, in advance, for your replies and insights.
-MM, possibly on behalf of others?
P.S. There's a poll for those of you who can't be bothered to post. (Hey, but posting's like, +1.:p (Seriously, though, this is, like, serious business.) (EtA: Also, posting probably helps explain rationale; hey, but it's cool.))
P.P.S. Sorry about this.
I like MTG Salvation, but that's just my opinion. Anyone know anything official?
If you take NYC and spell out the word City, it is NY City not NYCity - ok maybe a bad example but I don't see the reason for not including a space.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"It's worked so far, but we're not out yet." ~ Bones
I prefer MTGSalvation. Because that is what you put in your address bar to get here, and I think it looks better, one solid piece. I could overanalyze it an say that represents community, togetherness, structure- but who does that? I think it looks cool that way.
you have an inherent bias to this opinion, you realize.
furthermore, who's to say that your assessment of 'good' is any more accurate than the next person's?
Both NYCity and MTGSalvation looks sloppy and unprofessional. I don't know why anyone would want to omit the space...
yeah, i'd be more than glad to say that nycity looks "sloppy and unprofessional" (um, new york city is sort of a city, not a website; bad example, bad comparison, bad analogy).
but, you do realize there's a difference between the two, right, and that difference accounts for the huge variation of opinions?
you don't ever see people writing/typing nycity, but you do see ny city; but you do see people typing mtgsalvation and mtg salvation.
I like the space. As SSJ said it looks more professional.
Please get over-analytical, ta.:)
To extrapolate on the NYC example, it'd look even more weird as NewYorkCity!
Ever consider StarCityGames vs. Star City Games?
There are plenty of examples "supporting" MTGSalvation; there are plenty of examples "supporting" MTG Salvation.
N.B.: Note the inverted commas.
Nota benissimo: if the NYC "example" fails, then your entire argument comes crumbling down on it. That's the nature of extrapolations.
If the example itself is weak, well then, it's more or less insubstantial.
Both NYCity and MTGSalvation looks sloppy and unprofessional. I don't know why anyone would want to omit the space...
Mmm...
'cuz there's much validity to groupthink, communal reinforcement, bandwagoning, and an appeal to the proletariatmasseshoi-polloi majority - ya know, "I don't know why anyone would". (Also, "yeah, but they do", and it's not as though anyone's gotten particularly articulate and cogent with their PoV; myself included, of course.)
[Read. (That's not to say I don't read posts or anything.)]
Also, MM--Please don't leave?
Hmm...
Ultimately, I cannot not leave, by choice or otherwise.:(
As of now, I'm now thoroughly impartial on this matter, 'cuz, for starters, I shouldn't be promoting a particular view; I'm assuming this is a popular-opinion poll.
"In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane." - Oscar Wilde.
(I have no adversaries.:D)
Quote from Magic Mage, first post »
as opposed to MTG Salvation and MTGS (OMG, where did that space go?).
Yeah, basically, I feel that MTG Salvation and MTG S is inexcusable; and, for those of you who are gonna bring up NYC-NYCity, first of all, why on earth won't you just write NYC, instead of NY City, and secondly, :no:.
More, more, more posts, thanks.
All the better with rationale, too!:)
It looks so much better in my eyes when it's all neatly packed.
That's why I'd go with "MTG Salvation", abbreviated as "MTGS".
Fair enough, as for your stance, fellow sysop; but I'd really like to get to the bottom of this with an in-depth analysis.
(And perhaps a possible banner-change.:p Haha... hm...)
you have an inherent bias to this opinion, you realize.
As do you. So why bother mentioning it at all?
Oh, and you do know what the word 'opinion' means, right? And the fact that threads like this were created for the sole purpose of people giving their opinions?
um, new york city is sort of a city, not a website; bad example, bad comparison, bad analogy.
I never compared a city to a website (you're confusing the map with the territory), but now that you mention it, there are plenty of similarities. In both, people congregate and enjoy each other's presence . They hang out, have fun, play games, etc. You seemed to be stating that a city and a website are so utterly different that they may as well be a raven and a writing desk, but it's just not true.[/quote]
you don't ever see people writing/typing nycity, but you do see ny city; but you do see people typing mtgsalvation and mtg salvation.
People type "mtgsalvation"? Why?
...and even if I'm the only one not typing "mtgsalvation" (If I don't just click on my bookmark I'll type "foru...", which is clearly faster), that shouldn't matter. Do you also think that Google should rename 'Google news' to 'news.google' and 'Google Maps' to 'maps.google'?
There are plenty of examples "supporting" MTGSalvation; there are plenty of examples "supporting" MTG Salvation.
The examples themselves don't really matter. It's how we view each one. For example, the fact that SCG omits spaces from their site's name doesn't make it a good idea.
if the NYC "example" fails, then your entire argument comes crumbling down on it. That's the nature of extrapolations.
If the example itself is weak, well then, it's more or less insubstantial.
That's just not true. As I mentioned above, examples aren't really necessary, but they can help in getting people to understand other points of view.
'cuz there's much validity to groupthink, communal reinforcement, bandwagoning, and an appeal to the proletariatmasseshoi-polloi majority - ya know, "I don't know why anyone would". (Also, "yeah, but they do", and it's not as though anyone's gotten particularly articulate and cogent with their PoV; myself included, of course.)
I suggest you calm down long enough to listen to me telling you that I said that honestly - that I wasn't aware anyone wanted to omit the space. It was a simple expression of surprise.
Yes, and I prefer Star City Games, without a doubt.
And the website reads?
The examples themselves don't really matter. It's how we view each one. For example, the fact that SCG omits spaces from their site's name doesn't make it a good idea.
That's just not true. As I mentioned above, examples aren't really necessary, but they can help in getting people to understand other points of view.
Not true, or wrong; examples do matter, say, when you extrapolate or use inductive logic.
Other points of view; like, specific readings?
Why would you say this? Obviously people have done their best to explain their opinions here. Why ignore them?
I'm not and didn't.
What?
Ellipses denote my "what?"
I suggest you calm down long enough to listen to me telling you that I said that honestly - that I wasn't aware anyone wanted to omit the space. It was a simple expression of surprise.
I'm stressed, sorry.
What?? You're being forced to stay here? Yours is an odd brand of nonsense...
Yeah, thanks.
Way to misinterpret what I said. This is life; hell, why not read it as "you've got to go one day or another, one way or another".
Edited to add: Did you even understand what you thought you read? I'm sure as hell not going to spend an eternity here, and I'm sure you're just as unlikely to do so as I am.
It's a double negative, if you want to criticise me for your misperception and confusion.
In other words, you're a cop-out.
Wrong, and don't get pissed-off with, or dissect, me.
I simply shouldn't have presented any view and been impartial to the matter. Perhaps my intentions wasn't clear enough; I only wanted to know what was the consensus, if any, on the site's name - for use on the wiki, at the bare minimal.
See, I could sort of go through the wiki and change every instance of a certain word to another, manually or automagically, without prompting; that, however, wouldn't be too worthwhile if people complained about it after it were done.
WTF? Why shouldn't you be supporting 'a particular view'? That's what these polls are for...
I am supposed to be objective.
Two points:
1) I thought you said you were being impartial? Obviously NOT.
Yeah, I know, babe.
I was supposed to have been neutral on the matter.
Your point(s) being?
2) The use of a space in the name of this forum is inexcusable? Man, you've got some really messed-up priorities.
Heck yeah, "inexcusable"; did you not identify the hyperbole, or the magnitude thereof, implicit in that very word?
Consistency on the wiki, whatever?
Oh, cheers for the much-warranted, thoroughly frank, twisted compliment.:-/
Wow. Just...wow.
Similarly.
Due to your brazen sense of moral fibre, ascendency, and forcefulness, I think I'm thoroughly convinced that MTG Salvation is definitely the way to go.:)
Stuff it, really. This page reads "MTG Salvation Forums - Reply to Topic", after all.
I don't have a clue why those who have voted for "MTGSalvation" did so; anyone want to offer their views?
Jesus, I'm tired and moody. Sorry.
I'm more accustomed to MTGSalvation; that is all. Still, I've offered not analysis of MTGSalvation or MTG Salvation, but nor have you; you've engaged in argumentum ad personam. Why do you have to be so bloody antagonistic and severe?:(
P.S.: -"man", ktnx.
Uh...do I really have to tell you that it was the "full-stop, full-stop, full-stop" that made no sense to me, rather than the ellipsis? Apparently I do.
Yeah, thanks.
Way to misinterpret what I said. This is life; hell, why not read it as "you've got to go one day or another, one way or another".
Edited to add: Did you even understand what you thought you read? I'm sure as hell not going to spend an eternity here, and I'm sure you're just as unlikely to do so as I am.
It's a double negative, if you want to criticise me for your misperception and confusion.
Why do you sound angry, surprised and offended that I misinterpreted it? How the hell is normal person supposed to interpret "Ultimately, I cannot not leave, by choice or otherwise.:(" It's very vague at best. Feel free to explain if you want. You can't post something like that and expect everyone to understand what you mean.
I simply shouldn't have presented any view and been impartial to the matter. Perhaps my intentions wasn't clear enough; I only wanted to know what was the consensus, if any, on the site's name - for use on the wiki, at the bare minimal.
See, I could sort of go through the wiki and change every instance of a certain word to another, manually or automagically, without prompting; that, however, wouldn't be too worthwhile if people complained about it after it were done.
I am supposed to be objective.
Yeah, I know, babe.
I was supposed to have been neutral on the matter.
Your point(s) being?
My points being:
1) I don't understand why you feel the need to be impartial in this thread.
2) You've contradicted yourself by claiming to be impartial, and then giving your opinion, then looking at me like I have 10 heads for pointing the out.
Due to your brazen sense of moral fibre, ascendency, and forcefulness, I think I'm thoroughly convinced that MTG Salvation is definitely the way to go.:)
Still, I've offered not analysis of MTGSalvation or MTG Salvation, but nor have you; you've engaged in argumentum ad personam. Why do you have to be so bloody antagonistic and severe?:(
P.S.: -"man", ktnx.
I'm sorry if I've offended you or come off as mean - I didn't mean to. I'm just trying to have a conversation, geez...
Why do you sound angry, surprised and offended that I misinterpreted it? How the hell is normal person supposed to interpret "Ultimately, I cannot not leave, by choice or otherwise.:(" It's very vague at best. Feel free to explain if you want. You can't post something like that and expect everyone to understand what you mean.
Sound angry? Mmm... caffeine, other stuff, sleep deprivation, stress, woes and worries of the non-World Wide Web world, etc. Sorry.:-/
My points being:
1) I don't understand why you feel the need to be impartial in this thread.
Yeah, I getcha. As a sysop, I sort of feel the need to be as objective as possible; clearly, I failed doing that.
2) You've contradicted yourself by claiming to be impartial, and then giving your opinion, then looking at me like I have 10 heads for pointing the out.
Hm, sorry. -.-'
No. Given your nonsense about not being able to leave here and "full-stop, full-stop, full-stop", your meaning was very much muddled.
Understandable.:-/
You don't have to be a jerk about this.
No, really. Stop being a jerk. This comment was very much uncalled for.
Tu quoque, buddy; with it starting with you first, though (not that it matters).
What you said is justified. -_-'
It's cool now, right?:)
Why? Where have you seen it before?
Here, there, on-site, off-site; not that it gives it any more cred or validity to be used officially.
I'm sorry if I've offended you or come off as mean - I didn't mean to. I'm just trying to have a conversation, geez...
"Geez", ahaha...
It's cool, and we're chillin', unless you agree to disagree on this.
Look, JSS Alakazam, sorry that this has taken a turn for the worse; and to the others, sorry you guys had to put up with that.
If only I could wipe this clean now, or alter the course of events so things wouldn't be so sordid, if that's fitting for this situation.
Now, I have much-needed rest and reality to deal with, so goodnight/good day.
Btw, my flippant remark, "Really, stuff it." was a half-arsed attempt to quell this.:p Yeah; it means little to nil now.
I'm thinking this can be closed now, despite it only running for two days or so. Now I'm wondering what on earth to do with the MTGSWiki; as in, to change MTGSal. -> MTG Sal. so it's consistent throughout the MTGS Wiki/MTGSWiki (oh not again! *facepalm*), and in light of 'popular opinion'...
I think MTG Salvation with the space is more sleek, plus if you want to say to someone MTG Salvation, you don't have to add "All one word" after it....
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason." - Jack Handey
MY TYPE TOO DECKS
-B Rogues
-Sanguine Bond 5c Life gain
-Polymorph Tokens MY EXTENDED DECK
-BWrRs deck for da winz! MY TYPE ONE DECK
-Fluctuator
ptq 4th place
Haikus are easy
But sometimes they don't make sense
Refrigerator
Yeah, so I didn't read the thread, so you can all call me out on that and disrespect my opinion accordingly, but:
I have always thought it was MTGSalvation and stand by that as the name. You might want to ask Hannes what the domain is legally registered as, if it is. Or you might track down Xen, and ask what his intentions were. Even if I don't think his intentions particularly matter, I still think it would be great for someone to figure out what they were.
Coming from someone who loves aesthetics and hates capital letters in the middle of words when there should be a space (even though the first word is an acronym), I have to say that both sides of the argument are nearly correct.
Also, going form lurker to semi-regular poster (yet still lurking often), I can provide a somewhat "outsider" point-of-view.
My preference is thus:
"MTG Salvation" when spelled out.
"MTGS" when abbreviated.
(I blame deviantArt for ruining everything about naming websites on the interweb.)
thanx to High Lights Studios and Zaphod for the banner
wanna trade? im here to trade
this is my friend daveLL list
hurray for wiki
by the way its not a lime... its an oroblanco
DONT HAVE PERMANENT ACCÈS TO THE NET...
Both NYCity and MTGSalvation looks sloppy and unprofessional. I don't know why anyone would want to omit the space...
Omitting the space may make the site appear less professional but it also makes it seem more modern and urbane. In modern day, grammar rule's don't apply as they used to. Macy's spells their name macy's to imply youth. Seventeen magazine spells their name seventeen. And AT&T has become at&t. I would definitely prefer the look of MTGSalvation over MTG Salvation and it is the former spelling that has become the embraced. Of course, I may not be the best person to ask considering that my own username was selected for its looks over its sound.
Personally, I like the look of MTGSalvation, because I'm used to MTGS - you know, it follows; as opposed to MTG Salvation and MTGS (OMG, where did that space go?).
I think while both are tolerable, it's much better to have consistency throughout the wiki; which is why I'm asking right here, right now.
Thanks, in advance, for your replies and insights.
-MM, possibly on behalf of others?
P.S. There's a poll for those of you who can't be bothered to post. (Hey, but posting's like, +1.:p (Seriously, though, this is, like, serious business.) (EtA: Also, posting probably helps explain rationale; hey, but it's cool.))
P.P.S. Sorry about this.
As for the official naming, I'd use MTGSalvation.
Also, MM--Please don't leave?
Like freeform roleplaying? Try Darkness Befalls Us
Ryttare Kelasin Luna Orelinalei
If you take NYC and spell out the word City, it is NY City not NYCity - ok maybe a bad example but I don't see the reason for not including a space.
Both NYCity and MTGSalvation looks sloppy and unprofessional. I don't know why anyone would want to omit the space...
To extrapolate on the NYC example, it'd look even more weird as NewYorkCity!
MTG Salvation looks better.
Drop by my Helpdesk if you have any questions/concerns on the Limited forum.
Excited for M13 Limited? What do you think the format will look like? Head over to the limited forum and let us know what you think.
yeah, this is my view too.
huh; which explains why the mtgsalvation redirect was DELETED, as far as i can see.
iirc, your reason for deletion was "no reason for this page"
i think what really matters is hannes' voice on this matter
or xenphire's.
yeah, maybe that's a bad analogy/comparison?
even you admitted to it being a 'bad example'.
you have an inherent bias to this opinion, you realize.
furthermore, who's to say that your assessment of 'good' is any more accurate than the next person's?
yeah, i'd be more than glad to say that nycity looks "sloppy and unprofessional" (um, new york city is sort of a city, not a website; bad example, bad comparison, bad analogy).
but, you do realize there's a difference between the two, right, and that difference accounts for the huge variation of opinions?
you don't ever see people writing/typing nycity, but you do see ny city; but you do see people typing mtgsalvation and mtg salvation.
also, that's just one example.
yeah, for real.
rofl.
that just looks gross.
the colon makes my... haha, nvm.
— jean-baptiste alphonse karr, les guêpes (1849)
wiki subforum @ mtgs forums * mtgs wiki * site rules
Ever consider StarCityGames vs. Star City Games?
There are plenty of examples "supporting" MTGSalvation; there are plenty of examples "supporting" MTG Salvation.
N.B.: Note the inverted commas.
Nota benissimo: if the NYC "example" fails, then your entire argument comes crumbling down on it. That's the nature of extrapolations.
If the example itself is weak, well then, it's more or less insubstantial.
... simply because ... it is?:raise:
Full-stop, full-stop, full-stop...
Mmm...
'cuz there's much validity to groupthink, communal reinforcement, bandwagoning, and an appeal to the
proletariatmasseshoi-polloimajority - ya know, "I don't know why anyone would". (Also, "yeah, but they do", and it's not as though anyone's gotten particularly articulate and cogent with their PoV; myself included, of course.)Others present a couple fine points.
[Read. (That's not to say I don't read posts or anything.)]
Hmm...
Ultimately, I cannot not leave, by choice or otherwise.:(
As of now, I'm now thoroughly impartial on this matter, 'cuz, for starters, I shouldn't be promoting a particular view; I'm assuming this is a popular-opinion poll.
"In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane." - Oscar Wilde.
(I have no adversaries.:D)
Yeah, basically, I feel that MTG Salvation and MTG S is inexcusable; and, for those of you who are gonna bring up NYC-NYCity, first of all, why on earth won't you just write NYC, instead of NY City, and secondly, :no:.
More, more, more posts, thanks.
All the better with rationale, too!:)
It looks so much better in my eyes when it's all neatly packed.
Fair enough, as for your stance, fellow sysop; but I'd really like to get to the bottom of this with an in-depth analysis.
(And perhaps a possible banner-change.:p Haha... hm...)
Yo, MajoraX; post your write-in, please.
As do you. So why bother mentioning it at all?
Oh, and you do know what the word 'opinion' means, right? And the fact that threads like this were created for the sole purpose of people giving their opinions?
Same goes for you...what's with the feeble attempt at metalogic? You'd be better off just forgetting you ever went for it.
I never compared a city to a website (you're confusing the map with the territory), but now that you mention it, there are plenty of similarities. In both, people congregate and enjoy each other's presence . They hang out, have fun, play games, etc. You seemed to be stating that a city and a website are so utterly different that they may as well be a raven and a writing desk, but it's just not true.[/quote]
Wait a second. Did you really just ask me if I know the difference between a city and a website?
Why should names of websites be less professional and clean than cities?
People type "mtgsalvation"? Why?
...and even if I'm the only one not typing "mtgsalvation" (If I don't just click on my bookmark I'll type "foru...", which is clearly faster), that shouldn't matter. Do you also think that Google should rename 'Google news' to 'news.google' and 'Google Maps' to 'maps.google'?
Yes, and I prefer Star City Games, without a doubt.
The examples themselves don't really matter. It's how we view each one. For example, the fact that SCG omits spaces from their site's name doesn't make it a good idea.
That's just not true. As I mentioned above, examples aren't really necessary, but they can help in getting people to understand other points of view.
Why would you say this? Obviously people have done their best to explain their opinions here. Why ignore them?
What?
I suggest you calm down long enough to listen to me telling you that I said that honestly - that I wasn't aware anyone wanted to omit the space. It was a simple expression of surprise.
What?? You're being forced to stay here? Yours is an odd brand of nonsense...
In other words, you're a cop-out.
WTF? Why shouldn't you be supporting 'a particular view'? That's what these polls are for...
Two points:
1) I thought you said you were being impartial? Obviously NOT.
2) The use of a space in the name of this forum is inexcusable? Man, you've got some really messed-up priorities.
Wow. Just...wow.
Not true, or wrong; examples do matter, say, when you extrapolate or use inductive logic.
Other points of view; like, specific readings?
I'm not and didn't.
Ellipses denote my "what?"
I'm stressed, sorry.
Yeah, thanks.
Way to misinterpret what I said. This is life; hell, why not read it as "you've got to go one day or another, one way or another".
Edited to add: Did you even understand what you thought you read? I'm sure as hell not going to spend an eternity here, and I'm sure you're just as unlikely to do so as I am.
It's a double negative, if you want to criticise me for your misperception and confusion.
Wrong, and don't get pissed-off with, or dissect, me.
I simply shouldn't have presented any view and been impartial to the matter. Perhaps my intentions wasn't clear enough; I only wanted to know what was the consensus, if any, on the site's name - for use on the wiki, at the bare minimal.
See, I could sort of go through the wiki and change every instance of a certain word to another, manually or automagically, without prompting; that, however, wouldn't be too worthwhile if people complained about it after it were done.
I am supposed to be objective.
Yeah, I know, babe.
I was supposed to have been neutral on the matter.
Your point(s) being?
Heck yeah, "inexcusable"; did you not identify the hyperbole, or the magnitude thereof, implicit in that very word?
Consistency on the wiki, whatever?
Oh, cheers for the much-warranted, thoroughly frank, twisted compliment.:-/
Similarly.
Stuff it, really. This page reads "MTG Salvation Forums - Reply to Topic", after all.
I don't have a clue why those who have voted for "MTGSalvation" did so; anyone want to offer their views?
Jesus, I'm tired and moody. Sorry.
I'm more accustomed to MTGSalvation; that is all. Still, I've offered not analysis of MTGSalvation or MTG Salvation, but nor have you; you've engaged in argumentum ad personam. Why do you have to be so bloody antagonistic and severe?:(
P.S.: -"man", ktnx.
StarCityGames. Why does that matter?
Uh...do I really have to tell you that it was the "full-stop, full-stop, full-stop" that made no sense to me, rather than the ellipsis? Apparently I do.
Apology accepted. It's no big deal.
Why do you sound angry, surprised and offended that I misinterpreted it? How the hell is normal person supposed to interpret "Ultimately, I cannot not leave, by choice or otherwise.:(" It's very vague at best. Feel free to explain if you want. You can't post something like that and expect everyone to understand what you mean.
My points being:
1) I don't understand why you feel the need to be impartial in this thread.
2) You've contradicted yourself by claiming to be impartial, and then giving your opinion, then looking at me like I have 10 heads for pointing the out.
No. Given your nonsense about not being able to leave here and "full-stop, full-stop, full-stop", your meaning was very much muddled.
You don't have to be a jerk about this.
No, really. Stop being a jerk. This comment was very much uncalled for.
Why? Where have you seen it before?
I'm sorry if I've offended you or come off as mean - I didn't mean to. I'm just trying to have a conversation, geez...
Sound angry? Mmm... caffeine, other stuff, sleep deprivation, stress, woes and worries of the non-World Wide Web world, etc. Sorry.:-/
Yeah, I getcha. As a sysop, I sort of feel the need to be as objective as possible; clearly, I failed doing that.
Hm, sorry. -.-'
Understandable.:-/
Tu quoque, buddy; with it starting with you first, though (not that it matters).
What you said is justified. -_-'
It's cool now, right?:)
Here, there, on-site, off-site; not that it gives it any more cred or validity to be used officially.
"Geez", ahaha...
It's cool, and we're chillin', unless you agree to disagree on this.
Look, JSS Alakazam, sorry that this has taken a turn for the worse; and to the others, sorry you guys had to put up with that.
If only I could wipe this clean now, or alter the course of events so things wouldn't be so sordid, if that's fitting for this situation.
Now, I have much-needed rest and reality to deal with, so goodnight/good day.
Btw, my flippant remark, "Really, stuff it." was a half-arsed attempt to quell this.:p Yeah; it means little to nil now.
I'm thinking this can be closed now, despite it only running for two days or so. Now I'm wondering what on earth to do with the MTGSWiki; as in, to change MTGSal. -> MTG Sal. so it's consistent throughout the MTGS Wiki/MTGSWiki (oh not again! *facepalm*), and in light of 'popular opinion'...
Muh, I'll let it run its course for longer.
Yeah, better go now.
It would be odd for the name of the MTGS wiki to be different than MTGS itself, wouldn't it?
MY TYPE TOO DECKS
-B Rogues
-Sanguine Bond 5c Life gain
-Polymorph Tokens
MY EXTENDED DECK
-BWrRs deck for da winz!
MY TYPE ONE DECK
-Fluctuator
ptq 4th place
Haikus are easy
But sometimes they don't make sense
Refrigerator
I have always thought it was MTGSalvation and stand by that as the name. You might want to ask Hannes what the domain is legally registered as, if it is. Or you might track down Xen, and ask what his intentions were. Even if I don't think his intentions particularly matter, I still think it would be great for someone to figure out what they were.
But, yeah, MTGSalvation for sure.
Also, going form lurker to semi-regular poster (yet still lurking often), I can provide a somewhat "outsider" point-of-view.
My preference is thus:
"MTG Salvation" when spelled out.
"MTGS" when abbreviated.
(I blame deviantArt for ruining everything about naming websites on the interweb.)
forever
all of them
thanx to High Lights Studios and Zaphod for the banner
wanna trade?
im here to trade
this is my friend daveLL list
hurray for wiki
by the way its not a lime... its an oroblanco
DONT HAVE PERMANENT ACCÈS TO THE NET...
Omitting the space may make the site appear less professional but it also makes it seem more modern and urbane. In modern day, grammar rule's don't apply as they used to. Macy's spells their name macy's to imply youth. Seventeen magazine spells their name seventeen. And AT&T has become at&t. I would definitely prefer the look of MTGSalvation over MTG Salvation and it is the former spelling that has become the embraced. Of course, I may not be the best person to ask considering that my own username was selected for its looks over its sound.
as in "im salivating all over these magic cards"