Lol anyone who plays competitively knows that Tarmogoyf is and always will be infinitely better than tog. Tog had a deck built around it, whereas tarmogoyf made magic history. If possible, it would have been inducted into the power 10.
Tarmogoyf, what formats do you play?
Because your name will be silly in a year when you rotate out of T2.
And it will be even more silly in 4 years when the powercreep makes it so Tarmogoyf does not see play in any format. Imagine if there was someone on the forum called Umezawa's Jitte(Balduvian Horde or something, it saw a lot of play back in the day)
Your DATING your self. You would not get an respect from anyone in a year or two, as a mod.
Tarmogoyf gets played in every format buddy, don't know what you've been smoking. More than 50% of the top 8 deck lists for the previous extended season have contained 4 tarmogoyf. Comparing Jitte to tarmogoyf is like comparing watery grave to underground sea.
Besides, according to the poll it's unanimous. Therefore, I should be the next mod.
Tarmogoyf gets played in every format buddy, don't know what you've been smoking. More than 50% of the top 8 deck lists for the previous extended season have contained 4 tarmogoyf. Comparing Jitte to tarmogoyf is like comparing watery grave to underground sea.
Your missing the point. Yes, right now, Goyf sees that much play, but so did p'atog... and Morphling.... and Juzam Djinn
Creatures in Magic are subject to the 'power creep' (if you do not know what that means, ask someone) more than ANY-OTHER card type. Sure, right now 2008, Tarmogoyf is arguably 'the best creature ever printed.' But that WILL NOT be true in 2010, or 2012, or 2014.
As the new, and better creatures come out, people will forget about Gofy. Your clearly a spike, and I bet in 2011 you will not care about Gofy AT ALL.
Your missing the point. Yes, right now, Goyf sees that much play, but so did p'atog... and Morphling.... and Juzam Djinn
Creatures in Magic are subject to the 'power creep' (if you do not know what that means, ask someone) more than ANY-OTHER card type. Sure, right now 2008, Tarmogoyf is arguably 'the best creature ever printed.' But that WILL NOT be true in 2010, or 2012, or 2014.
As the new, and better creatures come out, people will forget about Gofy. Your clearly a spike, and I bet in 2011 you will not care about Gofy AT ALL.
Your name will not withstand the test of time.
Actually I think YOU'RE missing the point. All those creatures were exceptional and had decks built around them. Tarmogoyf is an auto-4 of in any compitent noncombo deck in extended, with very few exceptions.
Actually I think YOU'RE missing the point. All those creatures were exceptional and had decks built around them. Tarmogoyf is an auto-4 of in any compitent noncombo deck in extended, with very few exceptions.
Lol, his argument isn't even contesting that.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
You know that you want some delicious multi-planar cake....
Quote from sawbladeX »
Kreon bashing is unimportant.
What is important is the failure of logic that Kreon has that make him think that this will work.
You're right, his argument is even more outrageous. Sure there may be a slight power creep, but that won't creep tarmogoyf for atleast 10 years if ever. All the cards he's mentioned however I don't even consider playable in extended rofl. And him calling me a spike isn't really an insult. I think of myself as a spike-johnny building tons of rogue decks and winning at the same time, so where's the insult there? He's clearly a timmy of sorts, not understanding basic logistics of MTG.
My comment merely pointed out that when he said psychatog and morpling saw as much play as tarmogoyf, he was blatantly wrong. Reading is tech isn't it?
All the cards he's mentioned however I don't even consider playable in extended rofl.
That IS my point. At one point in history, all the cards I have mentioned were "the best creature ever printed" and NOW what are they?
Given enough time Tarmogoyf will go the way of Morphling.
Your name is great NOW, but soon it will be old and useless. It will not stand the test of time.
I would go father and point out that the VERY FACT you picked that name (and the fact that, based on your posts, you do not even understand my argument) proves you are a very short sighted person. You have no sense of time or history, and no ability to plan for the long term.
Which is why you would make a terrible Mod, while I, who not only sees how your short comings, but am willing to explain them to you, over and over, until you get it, would make a very good mod.
(I think this method, making you look dumb, is better than your 'spam the other guy' idea.)
My comment merely pointed out that when he said psychatog and morpling saw as much play as tarmogoyf, he was blatantly wrong. Reading is tech isn't it?
They have seen MORE play, and have been in MORE decks. But that's not the point.
That IS my point. At one point in history, all the cards I have mentioned were "the best creature ever printed" and NOW what are they?
Given enough time Tarmogoyf will go the way of Morphling.
Your name is great NOW, but soon it will be old and useless. It will not stand the test of time.
I would go father and point out that the VERY FACT you picked that name (and the fact that, based on your posts, you do not even understand my argument) proves you are a very short sighted person. You have no sense of time or history, and no ability to plan for the long term.
Which is why you would make a terrible Mod, while I, who not only sees how your short comings, but am willing to explain them to you, over and over, until you get it, would make a very good mod.
(I think this method, making you look dumb, is better than your 'spam the other guy' idea.)
ps:They have seen MORE play, and have been in MORE decks. But that's not the point.
Basically your critisizing my name as to why I would be a terrible mod. Accusing me of not understanding your argument only makes you look like an ignorant little hypocrite, because you're the one that does not understand my argument. As to which cards saw more play and etc, it's really a pretty pathetic argument on your part and now more than ever I feel I know more about this game than you.
Basically your critisizing my name as to why I would be a terrible mod.
No, I am saying the thoughts behind why you would have picked such a name do. It also leads me to believe you have not been playing magic for very long.
Accusing me of not understanding your argument only makes you look like an ignorant little hypocrite, because you're the one that does not understand my argument.
I understand that its not addressing the points I have brought to the table, and that parts of it are factious, like this part ->
As to which cards saw more play and etc, it's really a pretty pathetic argument on your part and now more than ever I feel I know more about this game than you.
Its not my point at all(as I said in the post you quoted 'that's not the point'). I am just showing you other cards that HAVE BEEN 'the best creature ever printed' and how as time passes, they become less and less impressive. It does not matter to my point 'who saw more play.' Your trying to straw man me like you did in the last post. (and your also using Appeal to ridicule, but mah)
FUN TIME! (Just like on the debate forum!)
No, I am saying the thoughts behind why you would have picked such a name do. It also leads me to believe you have not been playing magic for very long.I understand that its not addressing the points I have brought to the table, and that parts of it are factious, like this part -> Its not my point at all(as I said in the post you quoted 'that's not the point'). I am just showing you other cards that HAVE BEEN 'the best creature ever printed' and how as time passes, they become less and less impressive. It does not matter to my point 'who saw more play.' Your trying to straw man me like you did in the last post. (and your also using Appeal to ridicule, but mah)
I agree, just like the debate forum. Your arrogance forces you to nitpick every little word I say even though if you have any sort of intelligence at all you would understand. If you think so little of me, then why do you keep dumping my campaign thread? And YOU'RE the smart one..[/sarcasm]
I agree, just like the debate forum. Your arrogance forces you to nitpick every little word I say even though if you have any sort of intelligence at all you would understand. If you think so little of me, then why do you keep dumping my campaign thread? And YOU'RE the smart one..[/sarcasm]
Because, I want to prove to you what I know to be facts. Its a very strong drive I have.
Also your STILL
And if your saying I am bad at magic we should compare DCI rankings.
Because, I want to prove to you what I know to be facts. Its a very strong drive I have.
Also your STILL You think you could AT LEST switch up your logical fallacies, make it interesting.
PS. I understand YOUR point much better than you understand MINE. In fact you have YET to even address it.
at this point my only replies to you will be "thx4fr3bump"
at this point my only replies to you will be "thx4fr3bump"
Ignoratio elenchi? I do not mind. If that's your best comeback, I guess I did prove my point. At least to someone.
(every time I argue I like to see both sides of the issue, the fact that your side is full of logical fallacies proved to my self all of the things I first thought was true when I first read your name. You have helped me prove to myself that I was right all along, which is a good feeling :))
Ignoratio elenchi? I do not mind. If that's your best comeback, I guess I did prove my point. At least to someone.
(every time I argue I like to see both sides of the issue, the fact that your side is full of logical fallacies proved to my self all of the things I first thought was true when I first read your name. You have helped me prove to myself that I was right all along, which is a good feeling :))
thx4fr3bump
Maybe the reason I'm smarter than you is because I don't rely on wikipedia as a good resource in an argument. You may as well have said "I'm right cuz itson da internets!!1"
Lol anyone who plays competitively knows that Tarmogoyf is and always will be infinitely better than tog. Tog had a deck built around it, whereas tarmogoyf made magic history. If possible, it would have been inducted into the power 10.
Tarmogoyf gets played in every format buddy, don't know what you've been smoking. More than 50% of the top 8 deck lists for the previous extended season have contained 4 tarmogoyf. Comparing Jitte to tarmogoyf is like comparing watery grave to underground sea.
Besides, according to the poll it's unanimous. Therefore, I should be the next mod.
techoverrated.agreed
techoverrated.I've seen Bottle Gnomes Tooth and Nailed into play.
Suck it.
Sig by Spiderboy4 of High~Light Studios.
Developnent finished on Twilight Skies, Needs critique.
Development started on Aftermath.
Creatures in Magic are subject to the 'power creep' (if you do not know what that means, ask someone) more than ANY-OTHER card type. Sure, right now 2008, Tarmogoyf is arguably 'the best creature ever printed.' But that WILL NOT be true in 2010, or 2012, or 2014.
As the new, and better creatures come out, people will forget about Gofy. Your clearly a spike, and I bet in 2011 you will not care about Gofy AT ALL.
Your name will not withstand the test of time.
Actually I think YOU'RE missing the point. All those creatures were exceptional and had decks built around them. Tarmogoyf is an auto-4 of in any compitent noncombo deck in extended, with very few exceptions.
techoverrated.Lol, his argument isn't even contesting that.
You know that you want some delicious multi-planar cake....
You're right, his argument is even more outrageous. Sure there may be a slight power creep, but that won't creep tarmogoyf for atleast 10 years if ever. All the cards he's mentioned however I don't even consider playable in extended rofl. And him calling me a spike isn't really an insult. I think of myself as a spike-johnny building tons of rogue decks and winning at the same time, so where's the insult there? He's clearly a timmy of sorts, not understanding basic logistics of MTG.
My comment merely pointed out that when he said psychatog and morpling saw as much play as tarmogoyf, he was blatantly wrong. Reading is tech isn't it?
techoverrated.??æ?????? = Ending Lame Signatures And Avatars
Standard: GGG MGA
We do it for the lulz.
Given enough time Tarmogoyf will go the way of Morphling.
Your name is great NOW, but soon it will be old and useless. It will not stand the test of time.
I would go father and point out that the VERY FACT you picked that name (and the fact that, based on your posts, you do not even understand my argument) proves you are a very short sighted person. You have no sense of time or history, and no ability to plan for the long term.
Which is why you would make a terrible Mod, while I, who not only sees how your short comings, but am willing to explain them to you, over and over, until you get it, would make a very good mod.
(I think this method, making you look dumb, is better than your 'spam the other guy' idea.)
ps: They have seen MORE play, and have been in MORE decks. But that's not the point.
Lies! 8 people say yes and 8 people say yes! That's 16 people that want me to be a mod!
Basically your critisizing my name as to why I would be a terrible mod. Accusing me of not understanding your argument only makes you look like an ignorant little hypocrite, because you're the one that does not understand my argument. As to which cards saw more play and etc, it's really a pretty pathetic argument on your part and now more than ever I feel I know more about this game than you.
techoverrated.No, I am saying the thoughts behind why you would have picked such a name do. It also leads me to believe you have not been playing magic for very long. I understand that its not addressing the points I have brought to the table, and that parts of it are factious, like this part -> Its not my point at all(as I said in the post you quoted 'that's not the point'). I am just showing you other cards that HAVE BEEN 'the best creature ever printed' and how as time passes, they become less and less impressive. It does not matter to my point 'who saw more play.' Your trying to straw man me like you did in the last post. (and your also using Appeal to ridicule, but mah)
I agree, just like the debate forum. Your arrogance forces you to nitpick every little word I say even though if you have any sort of intelligence at all you would understand. If you think so little of me, then why do you keep dumping my campaign thread? And YOU'RE the smart one..[/sarcasm]
techoverrated.Because, I want to prove to you what I know to be facts. Its a very strong drive I have.
Also your STILL You think you could AT LEST switch up your logical fallacies, make it interesting.
PS. I understand YOUR point much better than you understand MINE. In fact you have YET to even address it.
at this point my only replies to you will be "thx4fr3bump"
techoverrated.(every time I argue I like to see both sides of the issue, the fact that your side is full of logical fallacies proved to my self all of the things I first thought was true when I first read your name. You have helped me prove to myself that I was right all along, which is a good feeling :))
Sigged.
Magic Rules Advisor
How Creatures Die
Targets | Triggered Abilities | Priority and the Stack | Older Articles
My reasoning is that I am already quite mad, and having power should only improve my condition.
Plus Tarmogoyf can be eaten by babies, WotC said so.
thx4fr3bump
Maybe the reason I'm smarter than you is because I don't rely on wikipedia as a good resource in an argument. You may as well have said "I'm right cuz itson da internets!!1"
techoverrated.