We will have to agree to disagree about the role then.
To trust or not is out of question here, his ability is confirmable, he simply removes the vote of someone N1, that guy tries to vote D2 and fail, therefore confirming his role.
One cannot say "I don't believe in your claim" when the role was just proved in the thread.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The game is not being dumbed down. Control is doing fine; Draw-Go is not the only kind of control. Aggro is doing fine; Red Deck Wins is not the only kind of aggro. Creature combat is an important core concept and belongs in every color. Mythic rarity is not destroying the game. People whine too much for no good reason. Magic is more popular than ever, so keep calm, brew some decks and play some damn cards.
Also, the role is town exclusive, did Id false-claim or something? because I see he was lynched and that should be impossible if he claimed truthfully... and you townies think you really played well?
Id claimed truthfully, but I, for one, had never seen a vote thief, and a basic analysis of how it could effect lylo a day early made me feel that unlimited (vs one-shot or conditional) wasn't a role that should ever be on town or scum. I think my logic was a driving force behind Id's lynch (because by claiming a role that shouldn't exist, he was obviously lying), and I still feel that it was borderline bastardly.
To trust or not is out of question here, his ability is confirmable, he simply removes the vote of someone N1, that guy tries to vote D2 and fail, therefore confirming his role.
One cannot say "I don't believe in your claim" when the role was just proved in the thread.
My point when this was brought up was that a scum vote-thief (restricted in some way, such as one-shot) could use his one-shot N1 to "prove" himself, then ride that out the rest of the game because beyond N1 it becomes too risky to use it even as town. Hence Id was safer to lynch D1 than attempt to "confirm".
To trust or not is out of question here, his ability is confirmable, he simply removes the vote of someone N1, that guy tries to vote D2 and fail, therefore confirming his role.
One cannot say "I don't believe in your claim" when the role was just proved in the thread.
Mythic rarity is not destroying the game. People whine too much for no good reason. Magic is more popular than ever, so keep calm, brew some decks and play some damn cards.
Id claimed truthfully, but I, for one, had never seen a vote thief, and a basic analysis of how it could effect lylo a day early made me feel that unlimited (vs one-shot or conditional) wasn't a role that should ever be on town or scum. I think my logic was a driving force behind Id's lynch (because by claiming a role that shouldn't exist, he was obviously lying), and I still feel that it was borderline bastardly.
My point when this was brought up was that a scum vote-thief (restricted in some way, such as one-shot) could use his one-shot N1 to "prove" himself, then ride that out the rest of the game because beyond N1 it becomes too risky to use it even as town. Hence Id was safer to lynch D1 than attempt to "confirm".