Short of the long of the article, basically a plastic surgeon was sued for a botching a boob job and a principal urinated in public. The suit started in Spain, then moved to the EU court making Google amend search queries if people so ask for it. I find that it certainly does assist with people who get Googled when searching for a job, among other things. This may help with people who have reformed their life and want to move on.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Life is a beautiful engineer, yet a brutal scientist.
The ruling would apply to all search engines under EU jurisdiction.
It is a strange ruling because it also affirmed that the original source of the information does not have to remove the information from its website. So the information will not be "forgotten" but search engines simply cannot tell people that it exists.
I wonder if this would be extended to websites that post links to other sites. And then would Google be prohibited from linking to those sites as well.
So the case held that a Spanish citizen has the right to force Google to remove search results listing the man's name in connection with the fact that his house had previously been foreclosed upon.
But ironically, the high court's press release, lists both the man's full name and the fact that his house had been foreclosed upon.
So the case held that a Spanish citizen has the right to force Google to remove search results listing the man's name in connection with the fact that his house had previously been foreclosed upon.
But ironically, the high court's press release, lists both the man's full name and the fact that his house had been foreclosed upon.
Is Google allowed to link to the press release?
Also... if google un-links one source who is responsible when a new source pops up? Does the citizen have to notify Google of every link they want removed or do the search Giants have to somehow try to catch them all?
I'm no legal expert, but this seems effectively unenforceable. I don't think the EU can force Google to take down new results because it would be too taxing, and few individuals have the time to be sufficiently vigilant about it themselves.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I primarily play limited, so most of my spoiler season comments view cards through that lens.
Short of the long of the article, basically a plastic surgeon was sued for a botching a boob job and a principal urinated in public. The suit started in Spain, then moved to the EU court making Google amend search queries if people so ask for it. I find that it certainly does assist with people who get Googled when searching for a job, among other things. This may help with people who have reformed their life and want to move on.
Modern
Commander
Cube
<a href="http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/the-game/the-cube-forum/cube-lists/588020-unpowered-themed-enchantment-an-enchanted-evening">An Enchanted Evening Cube </a>
All Google does is catalog stuff. Forcing Google to uncatalogue it, doesn't make it go away nor should it.
The ruling would apply to all search engines under EU jurisdiction.
It is a strange ruling because it also affirmed that the original source of the information does not have to remove the information from its website. So the information will not be "forgotten" but search engines simply cannot tell people that it exists.
I wonder if this would be extended to websites that post links to other sites. And then would Google be prohibited from linking to those sites as well.
But ironically, the high court's press release, lists both the man's full name and the fact that his house had been foreclosed upon.
Is Google allowed to link to the press release?
Also... if google un-links one source who is responsible when a new source pops up? Does the citizen have to notify Google of every link they want removed or do the search Giants have to somehow try to catch them all?
Interested in Custom Card Creation.
My Cube:Cardinal Custom Cube
A custom version of a third modern masters: MM2019
(filter->rarity to see in set rarity).
Do they realize that Google doesn't manually add stuff to it's searches?