This is a hypothetical to get people thinking along gaming lines:
Can one piece (a game piece), take over the whole world (with a winning strategy)?
Do you think, you could play strategically enough, to win absolutely everything?
It has been said "First you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the women" (I'm quoting here, this is not my view)... is this a kind of winning strategy that would conquer the world?
Bonus to you if your reply mentions Pinky and the Brain.
This is a hypothetical to get people thinking along gaming lines:
Can one piece (a game piece), take over the whole world (with a winning strategy)?
Do you think, you could play strategically enough, to win absolutely everything?
It has been said "First you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the women" (I'm quoting here, this is not my view)... is this a kind of winning strategy that would conquer the world?
Bonus to you if your reply mentions Pinky and the Brain.
I don't understand the question, at all. A game piece is an inanimate object... how could it take over the world? Is it supposed to be an analogy?
This is a hypothetical to get people thinking along gaming lines:
Can one piece (a game piece), take over the whole world (with a winning strategy)?
Do you think, you could play strategically enough, to win absolutely everything?
It has been said "First you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the women" (I'm quoting here, this is not my view)... is this a kind of winning strategy that would conquer the world?
Bonus to you if your reply mentions Pinky and the Brain.
It really depends on the game.
If you're playing chess, and you take away all the pieces but the king, you cannot win. No matter how good you are, even an unskilled opponent can force you into checkmate, and there's nothing you can do about it.
But if you contrive a game, and you define one piece with a "win the game" ability, than yes, you can win the game with just that one piece.
Can one piece (a game piece), take over the whole world (with a winning strategy)?
Do you think, you could play strategically enough, to win absolutely everything?
It has been said "First you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the women" (I'm quoting here, this is not my view)... is this a kind of winning strategy that would conquer the world?
Bonus to you if your reply mentions Pinky and the Brain.
I don't understand the question, at all. A game piece is an inanimate object... how could it take over the world? Is it supposed to be an analogy?
./confused
It really depends on the game.
If you're playing chess, and you take away all the pieces but the king, you cannot win. No matter how good you are, even an unskilled opponent can force you into checkmate, and there's nothing you can do about it.
But if you contrive a game, and you define one piece with a "win the game" ability, than yes, you can win the game with just that one piece.
I've always preferred South America. It's not quite so easy to defend, but it gives you more places to expand to.
The ol' Spykman analysis, eh? ABC the winning strategy!
Art is life itself.
G MGC
WB Teysa Tokens
BR Wortsnort
UG 23.5-No Edric
URG Noncombo Animar
GUB Damia Stax
WBR Alesha Hatebear Recursion
WBR Daddy Tariel
UBR [Je]love-a Your Deck
GWU Almost Critterless Enchantress
WUB Sydri+Artifacts=WUB
WURG Glint-Eye Combo
candidus inperti; si nil, his utere mecum.