woo another high cost card that does nothing the turn it comes into play. this one comes with an added bonus of not being splashable. anything NOT "for edh" in this set?
woo another high cost card that does nothing the turn it comes into play. this one comes with an added bonus of not being splashable. anything NOT "for bad edh" in this set?
Fixed
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Hey guys so I've actually moved on from commander on to 60 card decks so I don't have any commander decks.
Anyway I've started my own gameplay channel in which I play games (Magic also)
woo another high cost card that does nothing the turn it comes into play. this one comes with an added bonus of not being splashable. anything NOT "for bad edh" in this set?
Fixed
LOL, so true.
I'm personally not a huge fan of the card's abilities. However, I love the art and the flavor and would be happy to open one in limited.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Galspanic »
If someone is playing Icy Manipulator against you, you've already won.
woo another high cost card that does nothing the turn it comes into play. this one comes with an added bonus of not being splashable. anything NOT "for bad edh" in this set?
Fixed
i put the quotes around that since thats how wizards is hyping them up. i agree that its bad edh. also cool relevant username!
woo another high cost card that does nothing the turn it comes into play. this one comes with an added bonus of not being splashable. anything NOT "for bad edh" in this set?
Fixed
LOL, so true.
I'm personally not a huge fan of the card's abilities. However, I love the art and the flavor and would be happy to open one in limited.
Art is fantasic but wow! What a downgrade from the orginal. At least Ob was better than his orginal. What the hell guys?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Hey guys so I've actually moved on from commander on to 60 card decks so I don't have any commander decks.
Anyway I've started my own gameplay channel in which I play games (Magic also)
This seems flavor-foulish to me. I mean I know they've made different iterations of legends, but Idk...I don't like my legends to become LESS powerful. Maybe she's a prequel to Angel of Hope. Ugh, basically I just want there to be one awesome Avacyn and now this ruins that.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
SOI!!
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Spoiled on: http://mythicspoiler.com/m15/cards/avacyguardianangel.html
Fixed
Anyway I've started my own gameplay channel in which I play games (Magic also)
Twitch:
https://www.twitch.tv/dies_to_doom_blade
Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/user/UpsidedownHandshake
LOL, so true.
I'm personally not a huge fan of the card's abilities. However, I love the art and the flavor and would be happy to open one in limited.
i put the quotes around that since thats how wizards is hyping them up. i agree that its bad edh. also cool relevant username!
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/magic-fundamentals/the-rumor-mill/562880-mothership-spoilers-6-26
Art is fantasic but wow! What a downgrade from the orginal. At least Ob was better than his orginal. What the hell guys?
Anyway I've started my own gameplay channel in which I play games (Magic also)
Twitch:
https://www.twitch.tv/dies_to_doom_blade
Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/user/UpsidedownHandshake
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/magic-fundamentals/the-rumor-mill/562880-mothership-spoilers-6-26
Check out http://www.mtgbrodeals.com/author/john-murphy/ for my EDH articles!
Oops! Thanks for the link, I couldn't find the spoiler before I posted.
Thanks!
You couldn't find the top link in the forum? I have a feeling it's less that you couldn't find it, and more that you didn't bother to look.
Check out http://www.mtgbrodeals.com/author/john-murphy/ for my EDH articles!
That's incorrect, but I can understand why you might think so. I didn't see the Mothership thread when I was looking. Like I said, it's my bad.