The problem with defining this format by what is "fun" is that everyone seems to define fun as what they don't lose to. If you keep losing to easily answered cards, that means you should improve your deck. If you don't want to improve your deck, then you should come to peace with the idea that you are going to lose because you chose to not interact with better strategies.
Rimrock Knight and Reaper of Night have awesome art. Rimrock's reminds me of how MtG art USED to look back in the day. Reaper is just a bamf. Love that weird dragon horror behind him.
I'm... kind of confused why Malevolent Noble is... malevolent. Honestly sounds like a pretty nice guy unless I'm supposed to believe that the fresh children bones are sincere.
I wonder if Malevolent Noble is intended to be a reference to Elizabeth Bathory and/or Gilles de Rais. I know the latter was an influence for the tale of Bluebeard, which is sort of a fairy tale...
I'm... kind of confused why Malevolent Noble is... malevolent. Honestly sounds like a pretty nice guy unless I'm supposed to believe that the fresh children bones are sincere.
I'm sure to those witches he seems plenty malevolent.
It’s probably also going to be a limited powerhouse.
Older Magic as a Board Game: Panglacial Wurm , Mill
GWUBRDraft my Old Border Nostalgia Cube! and/or The Little Pauper Cube That Could!RBUWG
Modern:WDeath & TaxesW | RUGRUG DelverRUG
GWUBRDraft my Old Border Nostalgia Cube! and/or The Little Pauper Cube That Could!RBUWG
Modern:WDeath & TaxesW | RUGRUG DelverRUG
I'm sure to those witches he seems plenty malevolent.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
StaffThe art is TOO good, they had to balance it by making the card worse.