MTGS Wikia Article about "New World Order"
Every time I read a comment about "Well if this card had card draw/trample/haste/indestructible/hexproof/life gain...", I think "You're missing the point." They're armchair developer comments that fail to take into account the card's role in the greater Limited and Standard environment. No, it may not be as good as whatever card you're comparing it to. There's a reason for that. Not every burn spell is Lightning Bolt, nor does it need to be or should be.
PSA to everyone who keeps forgetting about the Reserved List:
You're on a website dedicated to talking about MtG. You're only a few keystrokes away from finding out what cards are on the Reserved List. You're also only a few keystrokes away from finding out why some cards on the Reserved List got foil printings in FtV, as Judge promos, or whatnot, as well as why that won't happen again. Stop doing this.
I'm super disappointed that now, on both of our worlds beleagured by sentient big-bads (Amonkhet and New Phyrexia) the surviving rebel character is red. Urabrask the Hidden and Koth of the Hammer are exactly the same as Hazoret the Fervent and Samut, the Tested, making this feel altogether very lazy.
Kefnet, where wwas this during the fight against The Scorpion God ?
As far as battles between gods are concerned this would only delay the enivtable; eventually the scorpion god will die and will cause more trouble upon his return.
I was expecting an uncounterable counterspell. UU with land exert? This isn't bad though.
That's what I was expecting a Counterspell for UU with land exert. Fun card though, I like this one.
Actually when I read the card name I was expecting a 1UU costed Last Word with land exert (along with "Today, I have been bested, but my last spell will remain unforgotten in history!")
Sure, we got something probably better, but I had so much expectations reading the name I'm still disappointed it isn't a counterspell of some sort (and will probably continue to be).
I was expecting an uncounterable counterspell. UU with land exert? This isn't bad though.
That's what I was expecting a Counterspell for UU with land exert. Fun card though, I like this one.
Actually when I read the card name I was expecting a 1UU costed Last Word with land exert (along with "Today, I have been bested, but my last spell will remain unforgotten in history!")
Sure, we got something probably better, but I had so much expectations reading the name I'm still disappointed it isn't a counterspell of some sort (and will probably continue to be).
I was hoping it would be a card draw spell.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Each part of the cycle was named differently.
Every time I read a comment about "Well if this card had card draw/trample/haste/indestructible/hexproof/life gain...", I think "You're missing the point." They're armchair developer comments that fail to take into account the card's role in the greater Limited and Standard environment. No, it may not be as good as whatever card you're comparing it to. There's a reason for that. Not every burn spell is Lightning Bolt, nor does it need to be or should be.
As far as battles between gods are concerned this would only delay the enivtable; eventually the scorpion god will die and will cause more trouble upon his return.
Actually when I read the card name I was expecting a 1UU costed Last Word with land exert (along with "Today, I have been bested, but my last spell will remain unforgotten in history!")
Sure, we got something probably better, but I had so much expectations reading the name I'm still disappointed it isn't a counterspell of some sort (and will probably continue to be).
I was hoping it would be a card draw spell.