The text in the text box looks funky. Between that and the collector number being covered up, and that Wizards wouldn't print instant speed land destruction nowadays, I think this is fake.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lapsed DCI Rules Advisor - Retired from playing but still hanging around
Besides all the other ridiculousness that proves this is fake, both land destruction AND non-basic land hate are super red. The card would be red if it were to ever see print.
Besides all the other ridiculousness that proves this is fake, both land destruction AND non-basic land hate are super red. The card would be red if it were to ever see print.
Besides all the other ridiculousness that proves this is fake, both land destruction AND non-basic land hate are super red. The card would be red if it were to ever see print.
The funny part is, they have (looong ago) printed a card that was this cost that was land destruction and nonbasic hate. Choking Sands.
Besides all the other ridiculousness that proves this is fake, both land destruction AND non-basic land hate are super red. The card would be red if it were to ever see print.
The funny part is, they have (looong ago) printed a card that was this cost that was land destruction and nonbasic hate. Choking Sands.
If they were willing to print LD that efficient (and thank goodness they aren't), that card would be a flavor home run.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
MTGS Wikia Article about "New World Order"
Every time I read a comment about "Well if this card had card draw/trample/haste/indestructible/hexproof/life gain...", I think "You're missing the point." They're armchair developer comments that fail to take into account the card's role in the greater Limited and Standard environment. No, it may not be as good as whatever card you're comparing it to. There's a reason for that. Not every burn spell is Lightning Bolt, nor does it need to be or should be.
PSA to everyone who keeps forgetting about the Reserved List:
You're on a website dedicated to talking about MtG. You're only a few keystrokes away from finding out what cards are on the Reserved List. You're also only a few keystrokes away from finding out why some cards on the Reserved List got foil printings in FtV, as Judge promos, or whatnot, as well as why that won't happen again. Stop doing this.
Honestly, with the way QC is going at WotC these days, I wouldn't discount the possibility of them accidentally missing either an egregious typo or a dangerously undercosted card that goes against everything they've said about playable LD for the past decade.
Anybody sourced the art? THAT would settle it, IMO.
EDIT: Should say "its" and not "it's"
Also, the whole Instant speed land destruction with additional upside being printed in 2017 thing.
375 unpowered cube - https://cubecobra.com/cube/list/601ac624832cdf1039947588
The flavor text tells everything.
As for the card itself, I think it's really good. It'll almost always cause discard. Maybe B/x control is back.
Edit: Good catch on the it's. Definitely fake then.
The flavor text makes this fake. The land does not move to suit the God-Pharaoh's interests. Thanks for the fake card, though.
The box where the name of the card is has some wacky perspective issues.
it apostrophe s
it is controller discards a card.
If you're going to produce a fake, at least get the ******* grammar right.
Want to be a better Magic player? Read the rulings forum and check out the comprehensive rules!
Probably Black red with the discard added.
Well, current standard includes Volcanic Upheaval, Grip of Desolation, and Scour from Existence...
The funny part is, they have (looong ago) printed a card that was this cost that was land destruction and nonbasic hate. Choking Sands.
As good as we've gotten at spotting fakes, it still took us 14 posts to see that? Yikes lol
If they were willing to print LD that efficient (and thank goodness they aren't), that card would be a flavor home run.
Every time I read a comment about "Well if this card had card draw/trample/haste/indestructible/hexproof/life gain...", I think "You're missing the point." They're armchair developer comments that fail to take into account the card's role in the greater Limited and Standard environment. No, it may not be as good as whatever card you're comparing it to. There's a reason for that. Not every burn spell is Lightning Bolt, nor does it need to be or should be.
haha i couldn't help myself
Anybody sourced the art? THAT would settle it, IMO.