That doesn't fit tribal. I could see a Morph commander in the future, though. In fact, I'd love to see a Commander product built around keywords a la Planechase 2012.
MTGS Wikia Article about "New World Order"
Every time I read a comment about "Well if this card had card draw/trample/haste/indestructible/hexproof/life gain...", I think "You're missing the point." They're armchair developer comments that fail to take into account the card's role in the greater Limited and Standard environment. No, it may not be as good as whatever card you're comparing it to. There's a reason for that. Not every burn spell is Lightning Bolt, nor does it need to be or should be.
PSA to everyone who keeps forgetting about the Reserved List:
You're on a website dedicated to talking about MtG. You're only a few keystrokes away from finding out what cards are on the Reserved List. You're also only a few keystrokes away from finding out why some cards on the Reserved List got foil printings in FtV, as Judge promos, or whatnot, as well as why that won't happen again. Stop doing this.
MTGS Wikia Article about "New World Order"
Every time I read a comment about "Well if this card had card draw/trample/haste/indestructible/hexproof/life gain...", I think "You're missing the point." They're armchair developer comments that fail to take into account the card's role in the greater Limited and Standard environment. No, it may not be as good as whatever card you're comparing it to. There's a reason for that. Not every burn spell is Lightning Bolt, nor does it need to be or should be.
PSA to everyone who keeps forgetting about the Reserved List:
You're on a website dedicated to talking about MtG. You're only a few keystrokes away from finding out what cards are on the Reserved List. You're also only a few keystrokes away from finding out why some cards on the Reserved List got foil printings in FtV, as Judge promos, or whatnot, as well as why that won't happen again. Stop doing this.
A buddy of mine came with the following theory yesterday, which I feel might have some merit to it.
They spoiled 5 cards, he thinks 5 legendary in 1 deck might be a bit much and that they are more intertwined, as in they have connection with the other decks, due to creature types being added in all decks to make some cards playable from one deck into the other...
He noted, that there are 3 other creature types amongst the dragons, which are Cat, Spirit and Human. Those could be the 3 other tribes/creature types. Which thinking about releases of creature types might even make some sense, seeing as we just recently got a Cat Lord in Amonkhet and Spirits have gotten a few neat new cards not long ago either...
What does everyone else think, I think it might not be that bad if those where the other tribes, probably Spirit then being the surprise one or Cats... either could be surprising and a human 'supertype' wouldn't be a bad idea as a whole either...
@ Colt47, there is a 3rd way, build a Scion of The Ur-dragon deck that changes into the worst dragons and beats face... it's what I used to run and it had a really good win ratio at the time...
I think the spoiler specifically said all of these are in the dragon deck.
The more I think about this, the more I think the remaining decks are something like: Goblins, Merfolk and Zombies. That the unexpected tribe was meant to be Dragons. But someone leaked it early.
I said it in another thread, but it bears repeating: Dragons being one of the tribes ranks up there with "the sun rose this morning" in terms of how expected it was.
Its only obvious we are getting dragons because, again, an instagram account which proceeded to get taken down had leaked them up. Before that? Dragons was in the exact same area as any other tribe in that it was a possibility but not a guaranteed fact. At this point it doesn't matter what the unexpected tribe actually was because of a leak, and because of that leak any tribe that would have shown up normally and last due to leaks is now unexpected.
Also how about these little factoids again: WotC, the company announcing product, fails to put even an artwork piece for this product. The whole "unexpected tribe" nonsense is from a twitter post as the actual announcement and product pages don't have any mention of an "unexpected tribe" showing up. The faux air of mystery set up WotC that is meant to create intrigue is created as part of marketing trick.
Some people just want to be played like a fiddle. Its like that family guy skit with peter and the mystery box where he is offered the box or the boat, but he is more interested in the box because it could be anything and its contents are unknown. Picking the box also makes him disappointed for picking it.
/ / / / / /
Dragons, Goblins, Elves, Humans, Zombies, Merfolk, Angels, Demons and Cats are the most popular tribes right now. Elves are in the anthology. Dragons are revealed. Which leaves Goblins, Humans, Zombies, Angels, Demons and Merfolk.
Goblins and Merfolk are very popular tribes in Commander, Modern and Legacy.
Demons only recently in the past ten years have been expanding outwards into other colors, namely blue and green, but the majority are in red and black.
Humans, Cats, Angels Zombies could easily be blanketed under five color as a tribe. Which is its own grab-bag of problems with making too many five-color decks.
Eldrazi are popular but not necessarily as a tribe, individual pieces of it are quite popular. They would need to actually make Eldrazi with a color identity. As otherwise we just get a third wave of the eldrazi titans who are colorless again.
Slivers are both a loved and hated tribe. If they show up, I would think it would be as their classic look based on the highly negative reaction that was received when slivers were made more humanoid.
The more I think about this, the more I think the remaining decks are something like: Goblins, Merfolk and Zombies. That the unexpected tribe was meant to be Dragons. But someone leaked it early.
I said it in another thread, but it bears repeating: Dragons being one of the tribes ranks up there with "the sun rose this morning" in terms of how expected it was.
Its only obvious we are getting dragons because, again, an instagram account which proceeded to get taken down had leaked them up. Before that? Dragons was in the exact same area as any other tribe in that it was a possibility but not a guaranteed fact. At this point it doesn't matter what the unexpected tribe actually was because of a leak, and because of that leak any tribe that would have shown up normally and last due to leaks is now unexpected.
Also how about these little factoids again: WotC, the company announcing product, fails to put even an artwork piece for this product. The whole "unexpected tribe" nonsense is from a twitter post as the actual announcement and product pages don't have any mention of an "unexpected tribe" showing up. The faux air of mystery set up WotC that is meant to create intrigue is created as part of marketing trick.
TL;DR: You are being played like a fiddle.
People love dragons. The kind of people who are inclined to play a fantasy trading card game especially love dragons. WotC is constantly printing dragons wherever they will fit, and even some places they won't. A year or so ago, we got two sets in a row that were all about dragons. The first FtV was dragon themed. One of the Archenemy decks was about dragons. There's the Knights vs Dragons Duel Deck. Magic's current big bad is a dragon. One of the old MtG paperbacks was called "The Dragons of Magic". Dragon dragon dragons. Dragon. Dragons dragons dragon dragons! It was inevitable that there'd eventually be a dragon-centric Commander deck, and what better time than when there's a tribal focus? Sure, dragons were never 100% a certainty (what is?), but you clearly aren't paying attention if you think that dragons weren't always the most likely tribe for C17.
As I said, dragons are popular. WotC knows this. Guys like Mark Rosewater have repeatedly mentioned dragons' popularity as the reason why they're everywhere. So WotC knows that we know that they know. It's not a secret. They know that many players wanted and/or expected dragons as one of the tribes. It's ludicrous to say that WotC thinks we wouldn't see dragons coming. The only way your post makes any sense is if Gavin Verhey told us an intentional lie. A really dumb lie at that, since we'd find out it was a lie one previews start up.
The more I think about this, the more I think the remaining decks are something like: Goblins, Merfolk and Zombies. That the unexpected tribe was meant to be Dragons. But someone leaked it early.
I said it in another thread, but it bears repeating: Dragons being one of the tribes ranks up there with "the sun rose this morning" in terms of how expected it was.
Its only obvious we are getting dragons because, again, an instagram account which proceeded to get taken down had leaked them up. Before that? Dragons was in the exact same area as any other tribe in that it was a possibility but not a guaranteed fact. At this point it doesn't matter what the unexpected tribe actually was because of a leak, and because of that leak any tribe that would have shown up normally and last due to leaks is now unexpected.
Also how about these little factoids again: WotC, the company announcing product, fails to put even an artwork piece for this product. The whole "unexpected tribe" nonsense is from a twitter post as the actual announcement and product pages don't have any mention of an "unexpected tribe" showing up. The faux air of mystery set up WotC that is meant to create intrigue is created as part of marketing trick.
TL;DR: You are being played like a fiddle.
People love dragons. The kind of people who are inclined to play a fantasy trading card game especially love dragons. WotC is constantly printing dragons wherever they will fit, and even some places they won't. A year or so ago, we got two sets in a row that were all about dragons. The first FtV was dragon themed. One of the Archenemy decks was about dragons. There's the Knights vs Dragons Duel Deck. Magic's current big bad is a dragon. One of the old MtG paperbacks was called "The Dragons of Magic". Dragon dragon dragons. Dragon. Dragons dragons dragon dragons! It was inevitable that there'd eventually be a dragon-centric Commander deck, and what better time than when there's a tribal focus? Sure, dragons were never 100% a certainty (what is?), but you clearly aren't paying attention if you think that dragons weren't always the most likely tribe for C17.
As I said, dragons are popular. WotC knows this. Guys like Mark Rosewater have repeatedly mentioned dragons' popularity as the reason why they're everywhere. So WotC knows that we know that they know. It's not a secret. They know that many players wanted and/or expected dragons as one of the tribes. It's ludicrous to say that WotC thinks we wouldn't see dragons coming. The only way your post makes any sense is if Gavin Verhey told us an intentional lie. A really dumb lie at that, since we'd find out it was a lie one previews start up.
I like dragons
Public Mod Note
(Marquisd):
Warning for spamming the forum
Sure, dragons were never 100% a certainty (what is?), but you clearly aren't paying attention if you think that dragons weren't always the most likely tribe for C17.
Using a now known fact as the "most likely" tribe to disprove my statement does not support your argument. In fact anyone with hindsight could tell you that as everyone who has hindsight is now suddenly a Nostradamus who was late to the party.
Also that "inevitable dragon commander deck" already happened. Like the inception of EDH/Commander was you played one of the five Elder Dragons as your general/commander, nothing less. It was why it was called Elder Dragon Highlander for the longest time before the format adopted the more blanketing name of Commander.
The only way your post makes any sense is if Gavin Verhey told us an intentional lie. A really dumb lie at that, since we'd find out it was a lie one previews start up.
I will reiterate my previous statement:
"At this point it doesn't matter what the unexpected tribe actually was because of a leak, and because of that leak any tribe that would have shown up normally and last due to leaks is now unexpected."
Any tribe could be an unexpected tribe. But because they are revealed last, they are now the defacto "unexpected tribe". If you want to look at it from another perspective, Marc, every tribe here is technically unexpected just like every past product released by WotC.
Take Amonkhet. Nobody was certain if we would get gods. When we saw their art, nobody was 100% knowing that they would not be enchantments. Nobody knew that each would come with a caveat that would be required for them to attack/block until we saw Hazoret. Same with curses, trials, cartouches, the non-mythic legends like Naheb, the exert mechanic, the -1/-1 counters, cycling, etc.
The only way you would know the entire set of cards is if you had one of those Godbooks like the one with the New Phyrexia incident. Where a PDF was spread around that showed the entire set weeks in advance.
Some called it correctly? Sure it was bound to happen. If you go back and read the thread for guesses its practically a shotgun blast of various speculations. Pirates, Squirrels, Oozes, Changelings, Dragons, Elves, Merfolks, Myr, Spirits, etc, etc. If one were blindfolded and throw a dart in every direction, one is bound to hit the dart board eventually.
Dimensional Wayfarer does have a point. Unless we are one of the few outlets given cards to reveal, are working for WotC, were on the design team or are leaking a card, we don't know anything. We can make baseless speculations on anything, but that is it at the end of the day. Dragons was just as expected in this thread as anything else in this thread.
The more I think about this, the more I think the remaining decks are something like: Goblins, Merfolk and Zombies. That the unexpected tribe was meant to be Dragons. But someone leaked it early.
I said it in another thread, but it bears repeating: Dragons being one of the tribes ranks up there with "the sun rose this morning" in terms of how expected it was.
Its only obvious we are getting dragons because, again, an instagram account which proceeded to get taken down had leaked them up. Before that? Dragons was in the exact same area as any other tribe in that it was a possibility but not a guaranteed fact. At this point it doesn't matter what the unexpected tribe actually was because of a leak, and because of that leak any tribe that would have shown up normally and last due to leaks is now unexpected.
Also how about these little factoids again: WotC, the company announcing product, fails to put even an artwork piece for this product. The whole "unexpected tribe" nonsense is from a twitter post as the actual announcement and product pages don't have any mention of an "unexpected tribe" showing up. The faux air of mystery set up WotC that is meant to create intrigue is created as part of marketing trick.
TL;DR: You are being played like a fiddle.
People love dragons. The kind of people who are inclined to play a fantasy trading card game especially love dragons. WotC is constantly printing dragons wherever they will fit, and even some places they won't. A year or so ago, we got two sets in a row that were all about dragons. The first FtV was dragon themed. One of the Archenemy decks was about dragons. There's the Knights vs Dragons Duel Deck. Magic's current big bad is a dragon. One of the old MtG paperbacks was called "The Dragons of Magic". Dragon dragon dragons. Dragon. Dragons dragons dragon dragons! It was inevitable that there'd eventually be a dragon-centric Commander deck, and what better time than when there's a tribal focus? Sure, dragons were never 100% a certainty (what is?), but you clearly aren't paying attention if you think that dragons weren't always the most likely tribe for C17.
As I said, dragons are popular. WotC knows this. Guys like Mark Rosewater have repeatedly mentioned dragons' popularity as the reason why they're everywhere. So WotC knows that we know that they know. It's not a secret. They know that many players wanted and/or expected dragons as one of the tribes. It's ludicrous to say that WotC thinks we wouldn't see dragons coming. The only way your post makes any sense is if Gavin Verhey told us an intentional lie. A really dumb lie at that, since we'd find out it was a lie one previews start up.
I like dragons
This is a good post.
I like dragons too.
Public Mod Note
(Marquisd):
warning for spamming the forum
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I know he thinks I'm impressed by a 102 MPH fastball in the 9th inning... Ok, I'm impressed, but that doesn't mean I can't crush it.
Sure, dragons were never 100% a certainty (what is?), but you clearly aren't paying attention if you think that dragons weren't always the most likely tribe for C17.
Using a now known fact as the "most likely" tribe to disprove my statement does not support your argument. In fact anyone with hindsight could tell you that as everyone who has hindsight is now suddenly a Nostradamus who was late to the party.
Also that "inevitable dragon commander deck" already happened. Like the inception of EDH/Commander was you played one of the five Elder Dragons as your general/commander, nothing less. It was why it was called Elder Dragon Highlander for the longest time before the format adopted the more blanketing name of Commander.
The only way your post makes any sense is if Gavin Verhey told us an intentional lie. A really dumb lie at that, since we'd find out it was a lie one previews start up.
I will reiterate my previous statement:
"At this point it doesn't matter what the unexpected tribe actually was because of a leak, and because of that leak any tribe that would have shown up normally and last due to leaks is now unexpected."
Any tribe could be an unexpected tribe. But because they are revealed last, they are now the defacto "unexpected tribe". If you want to look at it from another perspective, Marc, every tribe here is technically unexpected just like every past product released by WotC.
Take Amonkhet. Nobody was certain if we would get gods. When we saw their art, nobody was 100% knowing that they would not be enchantments. Nobody knew that each would come with a caveat that would be required for them to attack/block until we saw Hazoret. Same with curses, trials, cartouches, the non-mythic legends like Naheb, the exert mechanic, the -1/-1 counters, cycling, etc.
The only way you would know the entire set of cards is if you had one of those Godbooks like the one with the New Phyrexia incident. Where a PDF was spread around that showed the entire set weeks in advance.
Some called it correctly? Sure it was bound to happen. If you go back and read the thread for guesses its practically a shotgun blast of various speculations. Pirates, Squirrels, Oozes, Changelings, Dragons, Elves, Merfolks, Myr, Spirits, etc, etc. If one were blindfolded and throw a dart in every direction, one is bound to hit the dart board eventually.
You actually weighed Pirates, Squirrels, Myr, Spirits et al as having as much a chance as Dragons in getting one of the four spots? Wow.
You actually weighed Pirates, Squirrels, Myr, Spirits et al as having as much a chance as Dragons in getting one of the four spots? Wow.
You can't really weigh expectations. Myrs are just as valid as dragons. They were also stating how all of those tribes were speculated on and suggested to have a possibility of showing up.
You actually weighed Pirates, Squirrels, Myr, Spirits et al as having as much a chance as Dragons in getting one of the four spots? Wow.
You can't really weigh expectations. Myrs are just as valid as dragons. They were also stating how all of those tribes were speculated on and suggested to have a possibility of showing up.
In a metaphysical thought experiment, yes, you can weigh expectations evenly. All possibilities being infinitely possible given an infinite number of universes...blah, blah, blah...
However, we are discussing something that doesn't need to be a thought experiment. You can use logic to acknowledge that the field you are playing in has determining factors that increase the weight of certain probabilities more than others. For example, businesses operating for profit with concrete evidence that dragons are highly popular and in high demand. That lends additional weight to the probability of dragons being printed. A less common and less consistently popular, albeit popular in its own right, creature type such as Myr would logically be in less demand and produce less profit.
I've got to back RSSR on this one. You can absolutely weigh expectations in this scenario.
However, we are discussing something that doesn't need to be a thought experiment. You can use logic to acknowledge that the field you are playing in has determining factors that increase the weight of certain probabilities more than others. For example, businesses operating for profit with concrete evidence that dragons are highly popular and in high demand. That lends additional weight to the probability of dragons being printed. A less common and less consistently popular, albeit popular in its own right, creature type such as Myr would logically be in less demand and produce less profit.
You can absolutely weigh expectations in this scenario.
Alright. So dragons are a possibility but monkeys are an impossibility?
However, we are discussing something that doesn't need to be a thought experiment. You can use logic to acknowledge that the field you are playing in has determining factors that increase the weight of certain probabilities more than others. For example, businesses operating for profit with concrete evidence that dragons are highly popular and in high demand. That lends additional weight to the probability of dragons being printed. A less common and less consistently popular, albeit popular in its own right, creature type such as Myr would logically be in less demand and produce less profit.
You can absolutely weigh expectations in this scenario.
Alright. So dragons are a possibility but monkeys are an impossibility?
However, we are discussing something that doesn't need to be a thought experiment. You can use logic to acknowledge that the field you are playing in has determining factors that increase the weight of certain probabilities more than others. For example, businesses operating for profit with concrete evidence that dragons are highly popular and in high demand. That lends additional weight to the probability of dragons being printed. A less common and less consistently popular, albeit popular in its own right, creature type such as Myr would logically be in less demand and produce less profit.
You can absolutely weigh expectations in this scenario.
Alright. So dragons are a possibility but monkeys are an impossibility?
I honestly can't remember if I considered dragons or not before "spoilers." I imagine I'd have ruled them out, as what can really compete? Can't you just see someone saying, "No, I don't want the dragon deck. I want that awesome myr deck"? Yeah, I don't think so.
However, we are discussing something that doesn't need to be a thought experiment. You can use logic to acknowledge that the field you are playing in has determining factors that increase the weight of certain probabilities more than others. For example, businesses operating for profit with concrete evidence that dragons are highly popular and in high demand. That lends additional weight to the probability of dragons being printed. A less common and less consistently popular, albeit popular in its own right, creature type such as Myr would logically be in less demand and produce less profit.
You can absolutely weigh expectations in this scenario.
Alright. So dragons are a possibility but monkeys are an impossibility?
However, we are discussing something that doesn't need to be a thought experiment. You can use logic to acknowledge that the field you are playing in has determining factors that increase the weight of certain probabilities more than others. For example, businesses operating for profit with concrete evidence that dragons are highly popular and in high demand. That lends additional weight to the probability of dragons being printed. A less common and less consistently popular, albeit popular in its own right, creature type such as Myr would logically be in less demand and produce less profit.
You can absolutely weigh expectations in this scenario.
Alright. So dragons are a possibility but monkeys are an impossibility?
Monkeys would require many new cards printed..many many many.
However, we are discussing something that doesn't need to be a thought experiment. You can use logic to acknowledge that the field you are playing in has determining factors that increase the weight of certain probabilities more than others. For example, businesses operating for profit with concrete evidence that dragons are highly popular and in high demand. That lends additional weight to the probability of dragons being printed. A less common and less consistently popular, albeit popular in its own right, creature type such as Myr would logically be in less demand and produce less profit.
You can absolutely weigh expectations in this scenario.
Alright. So dragons are a possibility but monkeys are an impossibility?
Monkeys would require many new cards printed..many many many.
Well if my math is right each deck gets about 14 new cards.
Every time I read a comment about "Well if this card had card draw/trample/haste/indestructible/hexproof/life gain...", I think "You're missing the point." They're armchair developer comments that fail to take into account the card's role in the greater Limited and Standard environment. No, it may not be as good as whatever card you're comparing it to. There's a reason for that. Not every burn spell is Lightning Bolt, nor does it need to be or should be.
One besides #ripoffcopyofSpiritoftheNightforwankers you mean?
Goblin Green Acres
Every time I read a comment about "Well if this card had card draw/trample/haste/indestructible/hexproof/life gain...", I think "You're missing the point." They're armchair developer comments that fail to take into account the card's role in the greater Limited and Standard environment. No, it may not be as good as whatever card you're comparing it to. There's a reason for that. Not every burn spell is Lightning Bolt, nor does it need to be or should be.
I think the spoiler specifically said all of these are in the dragon deck.
Also how about these little factoids again: WotC, the company announcing product, fails to put even an artwork piece for this product. The whole "unexpected tribe" nonsense is from a twitter post as the actual announcement and product pages don't have any mention of an "unexpected tribe" showing up. The faux air of mystery set up WotC that is meant to create intrigue is created as part of marketing trick.
TL;DR: You are being played like a fiddle.
/ / / / / /
Dragons, Goblins, Elves, Humans, Zombies, Merfolk, Angels, Demons and Cats are the most popular tribes right now. Elves are in the anthology. Dragons are revealed. Which leaves Goblins, Humans, Zombies, Angels, Demons and Merfolk.
Goblins and Merfolk are very popular tribes in Commander, Modern and Legacy.
Demons only recently in the past ten years have been expanding outwards into other colors, namely blue and green, but the majority are in red and black.
Humans, Cats, Angels Zombies could easily be blanketed under five color as a tribe. Which is its own grab-bag of problems with making too many five-color decks.
Eldrazi are popular but not necessarily as a tribe, individual pieces of it are quite popular. They would need to actually make Eldrazi with a color identity. As otherwise we just get a third wave of the eldrazi titans who are colorless again.
Slivers are both a loved and hated tribe. If they show up, I would think it would be as their classic look based on the highly negative reaction that was received when slivers were made more humanoid.
As I said, dragons are popular. WotC knows this. Guys like Mark Rosewater have repeatedly mentioned dragons' popularity as the reason why they're everywhere. So WotC knows that we know that they know. It's not a secret. They know that many players wanted and/or expected dragons as one of the tribes. It's ludicrous to say that WotC thinks we wouldn't see dragons coming. The only way your post makes any sense is if Gavin Verhey told us an intentional lie. A really dumb lie at that, since we'd find out it was a lie one previews start up.
I like dragons
Also that "inevitable dragon commander deck" already happened. Like the inception of EDH/Commander was you played one of the five Elder Dragons as your general/commander, nothing less. It was why it was called Elder Dragon Highlander for the longest time before the format adopted the more blanketing name of Commander.
I will reiterate my previous statement:
"At this point it doesn't matter what the unexpected tribe actually was because of a leak, and because of that leak any tribe that would have shown up normally and last due to leaks is now unexpected."
Any tribe could be an unexpected tribe. But because they are revealed last, they are now the defacto "unexpected tribe". If you want to look at it from another perspective, Marc, every tribe here is technically unexpected just like every past product released by WotC.
Take Amonkhet. Nobody was certain if we would get gods. When we saw their art, nobody was 100% knowing that they would not be enchantments. Nobody knew that each would come with a caveat that would be required for them to attack/block until we saw Hazoret. Same with curses, trials, cartouches, the non-mythic legends like Naheb, the exert mechanic, the -1/-1 counters, cycling, etc.
The only way you would know the entire set of cards is if you had one of those Godbooks like the one with the New Phyrexia incident. Where a PDF was spread around that showed the entire set weeks in advance.
Some called it correctly? Sure it was bound to happen. If you go back and read the thread for guesses its practically a shotgun blast of various speculations. Pirates, Squirrels, Oozes, Changelings, Dragons, Elves, Merfolks, Myr, Spirits, etc, etc. If one were blindfolded and throw a dart in every direction, one is bound to hit the dart board eventually.
This is a good post.
I like dragons too.
You actually weighed Pirates, Squirrels, Myr, Spirits et al as having as much a chance as Dragons in getting one of the four spots? Wow.
In a metaphysical thought experiment, yes, you can weigh expectations evenly. All possibilities being infinitely possible given an infinite number of universes...blah, blah, blah...
However, we are discussing something that doesn't need to be a thought experiment. You can use logic to acknowledge that the field you are playing in has determining factors that increase the weight of certain probabilities more than others. For example, businesses operating for profit with concrete evidence that dragons are highly popular and in high demand. That lends additional weight to the probability of dragons being printed. A less common and less consistently popular, albeit popular in its own right, creature type such as Myr would logically be in less demand and produce less profit.
I've got to back RSSR on this one. You can absolutely weigh expectations in this scenario.
That would be awesome
These are the only logical ones.
Correct
Not popular/interesting enough nor unexspected.
Monkeys would require many new cards printed..many many many.
Dragons of Legend, Lead by Scion of the UR-Dragon
The Gitrog Monster
Gonti, Lord of Luxury
Shogun Saskia
Hive World
Atraxa hates fun
Abzan