Yeah. I'm not sure how you represent "flaw analysis", but it seems like it should be a bit different. The first kind of looks like that, and the ultimate even less, but I can't really find any flaw analysis explanation of heal and draw life. Maybe it's fixing your own flaws?
I suppose that's one way to look at it. He's noting your deficiencies and offering suggestions to combat your shortcomings(gather more intel (draw a card) and fortify your base (gain life)).
It just doesn't really feel like there's any unifying factor to him.
The problem with defining this format by what is "fun" is that everyone seems to define fun as what they don't lose to. If you keep losing to easily answered cards, that means you should improve your deck. If you don't want to improve your deck, then you should come to peace with the idea that you are going to lose because you chose to not interact with better strategies.
Yeah. I'm not sure how you represent "flaw analysis", but it seems like it should be a bit different. The first kind of looks like that, and the ultimate even less, but I can't really find any flaw analysis explanation of heal and draw life. Maybe it's fixing your own flaws?
I suppose that's one way to look at it. He's noting your deficiencies and offering suggestions to combat your shortcomings(gather more intel (draw a card) and fortify your base (gain life)).
It just doesn't really feel like there's any unifying factor to him.
Agreed. It feels very loose. But I'm not really sure how flaw analysis should work mechanically, so the fact they went really generic is kind of understandable. Hopefully he gets a second card someday so we can see more flaw stuff.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I suppose that's one way to look at it. He's noting your deficiencies and offering suggestions to combat your shortcomings(gather more intel (draw a card) and fortify your base (gain life)).
It just doesn't really feel like there's any unifying factor to him.
I can't wait to draft this guy in my friend's Cube.
Agreed. It feels very loose. But I'm not really sure how flaw analysis should work mechanically, so the fact they went really generic is kind of understandable. Hopefully he gets a second card someday so we can see more flaw stuff.