Wizards has to decide if a multimillion dollar lawsuit is worth it, and alienating a lot of there player base, I don't think its worth it to abolish the reseve list.
Wizards has to decide if a multimillion dollar lawsuit is worth it, and alienating a lot of there player base, I don't think its worth it to abolish the reseve list.
There's no room for them to be sued if they undid it - they might lose a ton of sales and many LGS's would probably stop selling their product if they did, but there's no grounds for a lawsuit because they decided to change a policy.
There's no room for them to be sued if they undid it - they might lose a ton of sales and many LGS's would probably stop selling their product if they did, but there's no grounds for a lawsuit because they decided to change a policy.
Actually there is, you can sue for false advertising there produtuct, the legal defintion of False advertising is,
"Any advertising or promotion that misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities or geographic origin of goods, services or commercial activities.
So they said they would never break the reserve list. That right there is false advertising. Because you bought there product knowing that you're buying elite product that woudln't lower the value of said product by reprinting it, and making it more readily available Yes, that's lawsuit worthy.
To be able to sue for False advertising you must be able to prove 5 things
To establish that an advertisement is false, a plaintiff must prove five things: (1) a false statement of fact has been made about the advertiser's own or another person's goods, services, or commercial activity; Proven.(2) the statement either deceives or has the potential to deceive a substantial portion of its targeted audience;proven (3) the deception is also likely to affect the purchasing decisions of its audience; proven (4) the advertising involves goods or services in interstate commerce; proven and (5) the deception has either resulted in or is likely to result in injury to the plaintiff. The most heavily weighed factor is the advertisement's potential to injure a customer, And proven. It's all there for a False advertising lawsuit.
Now if I can just get Wayne Reynolds and Raymond Swanland have a lovechild that combines their artistic styles, I'd be in heaven.
Trade Thread
Dega midrange 1-0
There's no room for them to be sued if they undid it - they might lose a ton of sales and many LGS's would probably stop selling their product if they did, but there's no grounds for a lawsuit because they decided to change a policy.
Re: People misusing the term Vanilla to describe a flying, unleash (sometimes trample) critter.
Actually there is, you can sue for false advertising there produtuct, the legal defintion of False advertising is,
"Any advertising or promotion that misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities or geographic origin of goods, services or commercial activities.
So they said they would never break the reserve list. That right there is false advertising. Because you bought there product knowing that you're buying elite product that woudln't lower the value of said product by reprinting it, and making it more readily available Yes, that's lawsuit worthy.
To be able to sue for False advertising you must be able to prove 5 things
To establish that an advertisement is false, a plaintiff must prove five things: (1) a false statement of fact has been made about the advertiser's own or another person's goods, services, or commercial activity; Proven.(2) the statement either deceives or has the potential to deceive a substantial portion of its targeted audience;proven (3) the deception is also likely to affect the purchasing decisions of its audience; proven (4) the advertising involves goods or services in interstate commerce; proven and (5) the deception has either resulted in or is likely to result in injury to the plaintiff. The most heavily weighed factor is the advertisement's potential to injure a customer, And proven. It's all there for a False advertising lawsuit.
Dega midrange 1-0