I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Can you say what you mean by "opposes or hoses"? Does oppose mean it actually has to interact negatively with the mechanic, or simply function on the opposite side of the spectrum?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
EDH Azami (video)
:symw::symb::symg: Teneb (video) Drana (video) (retired)
:symw::symr: Brion (video)
:symb::symr: Wort (video) Arcum (video) (retired)
:symr::symg: Stonebrow (video) BShirei (video) WURasputin (video) (retired) RUrabrask (video) WURZedruu (video) (retired) WIsamaru UBGrimgrin UMistform Ultimus (video) UBRGwendlyn (video) URGAnimar (video) RGThromok WBSelenia Standard WUGeist of Saint Traft standard EDH (video) (retired) WUB Battle of Wits!
Can you say what you mean by "opposes or hoses"? Does oppose mean it actually has to interact negatively with the mechanic, or simply function on the opposite side of the spectrum?
It should have an effect that is generally seen as undesirable for your opponent. Them losing life, discarding cards, sacrificing permanents, etc. Also, stuff like you gaining life, drawing cards, or getting free stuff. Essentially, there needs to be some sort of punishment for using your main mechanic.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I'm having trouble with my wording.
I want something that stops artifacts from being creatures.
"Each artifact creature isn’t a creature." is where I am right now, because of that latest spoiler of Theros.
Do you think that will be alright?
And how does the layer system work for that?
Do I need another "Artifacts can't become creatures."?
And does "As long as <condition>, you may pay X instead of paying ~s casting cost." work for an alternate casting cost?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
—Eli Shiffrin, Rules Manager, on a design stacking lifelink instances
I'm having trouble with my wording.
I want something that stops artifacts from being creatures.
"Each artifact creature isn’t a creature." is where I am right now, because of that latest spoiler of Theros.
Do you think that will be alright?
And how does the layer system work for that?
Do I need another "Artifacts can't become creatures."?
And does "As long as <condition>, you may pay X instead of paying ~s casting cost." work for an alternate casting cost?
Honestly, I'm probably the worst judge when it comes to layers, but it seems like you'd need to flip the wording of March of the Machines or something similar (Though with Thassa around, I like the wording you have). The question is what happens when multiple abilities that define what a card is come into play? Say, your effect and March of the Machines are both on the field. I want to say that timestamp determines what happens, but I'm just not 100% sure. =/
You should ask around the Custom Card Rulings section. I'm sure one of the regulars there has the answer, or at least a better guess than I.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Sorry for missing my previous entries. If I edit my post to link for the remaining judges would that be a disqualification?
It's probably too late now anyway.
Sorry for missing my previous entries. If I edit my post to link for the remaining judges would that be a disqualification?
It's probably too late now anyway.
lol I was just poking at you. Slap on the wrist. Don't bother editing, as the judge deadline is in less than 8 hours.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Is there another precedent for where an alternate cost ability would be placed on a card? I had assumed my mechanic would work the same as Evoke and come last on the card.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
EDH Azami (video)
:symw::symb::symg: Teneb (video) Drana (video) (retired)
:symw::symr: Brion (video)
:symb::symr: Wort (video) Arcum (video) (retired)
:symr::symg: Stonebrow (video) BShirei (video) WURasputin (video) (retired) RUrabrask (video) WURZedruu (video) (retired) WIsamaru UBGrimgrin UMistform Ultimus (video) UBRGwendlyn (video) URGAnimar (video) RGThromok WBSelenia Standard WUGeist of Saint Traft standard EDH (video) (retired) WUB Battle of Wits!
Is there another precedent for where an alternate cost ability would be placed on a card? I had assumed my mechanic would work the same as Evoke and come last on the card.
In general, alternate casting costs need to come first on the card, since that's the first thing you'll generally read when you draw it. Oddly enough, my "something is wrong" radar didn't go off there when I did my judgings and I stand by my decision, but I fully support the other judges to disagree. That's the nature of the beast; even WotC doesn't follow all of its rules all the time.
On a somewhat related note, we've got more than six judges for September for the first time in what seems like forever. Thank you, you beautiful people.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I'm done, sorry, was at PAX yesterday (failed to get into the party for the 2nd year running, but did other fun things).
I don't think my scores change the current ranking any, still a win for Antny223. Congratulations!
Reminder to all contestants that it has to be a common card for September Round 1!
Gratulations to Antny233, the simple cards are the way to go, something I felt I couldn't do with where I came from.
I thought like Anathema is indeed very white as it's a church thing.
And I found it was funny that aurorasparrow told me my idea was retroactively unoriginal. Damn you WotC!
My card ended up rather meh and the better card(s) won.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
—Eli Shiffrin, Rules Manager, on a design stacking lifelink instances
I'm done, sorry, was at PAX yesterday (failed to get into the party for the 2nd year running, but did other fun things).
I don't think my scores change the current ranking any, still a win for Antny223. Congratulations!
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I'm honestly both surprised and delighted to have won. Thanks to all the hard work the judges put in and looking forward to pulling up my socks and giving it a go this month. See you there.
Whoa, I didn't realize that we got so few entries this round while having more judges than usual. We need to keep the standard "Top 4 Advance" round one to preserve the integrity of later rounds (7 contestants in round 3 just will not work.)
I know you already did your judgings, but we'll need to give a judge a break this month and redistribute his or her entries so that each remaining bracket has at least 5 entries in it.
Any judge volunteers? Actually, nevermind. RedLoa, my friend, you were the last judge to sign up for this month so you're the one that I'll redistribute. Enjoy your time off.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
RedLoa does have an entry.
Then again it doesn't look entirely serious.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
—Eli Shiffrin, Rules Manager, on a design stacking lifelink instances
RedLoa does have an entry.
Then again it doesn't look entirely serious.
You make a good point. I'd forgotten he had a judge entry up.
OKAY! Slightly reworked brackets are up! Top Four advance. arbitraryarmor, this means one more card for you to judge. RedLoa, your judge entry is now a part of (nameless one)'s bracket.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Can you say what you mean by "opposes or hoses"? Does oppose mean it actually has to interact negatively with the mechanic, or simply function on the opposite side of the spectrum?
EDH
Azami (video)
:symw::symb::symg: Teneb (video)
Drana (video) (retired)
:symw::symr: Brion (video)
:symb::symr: Wort (video)
Arcum (video) (retired)
:symr::symg: Stonebrow (video)
B Shirei (video)
WU Rasputin (video) (retired)
R Urabrask (video)
WUR Zedruu (video) (retired)
W Isamaru
UB Grimgrin
U Mistform Ultimus (video)
UBR Gwendlyn (video)
URG Animar (video)
RG Thromok
WB Selenia
Standard
WU Geist of Saint Traft standard EDH (video) (retired)
WUB Battle of Wits!
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I want something that stops artifacts from being creatures.
"Each artifact creature isn’t a creature." is where I am right now, because of that latest spoiler of Theros.
Do you think that will be alright?
And how does the layer system work for that?
Do I need another "Artifacts can't become creatures."?
And does "As long as <condition>, you may pay X instead of paying ~s casting cost." work for an alternate casting cost?
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
—Eli Shiffrin, Rules Manager, on a design stacking lifelink instances
You should ask around the Custom Card Rulings section. I'm sure one of the regulars there has the answer, or at least a better guess than I.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showpost.php?p=10621789&postcount=5
My judgings are done. As always, no complaints.
It's probably too late now anyway.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Modern:WUSpiritsWU, R12 BoltR
Commander:Diamonds are a Girls Best Friend, Ace of Spades, I Love the Night, The Reaper
~Signature by: Miraculous Recovery Signatures~
EDH
Azami (video)
:symw::symb::symg: Teneb (video)
Drana (video) (retired)
:symw::symr: Brion (video)
:symb::symr: Wort (video)
Arcum (video) (retired)
:symr::symg: Stonebrow (video)
B Shirei (video)
WU Rasputin (video) (retired)
R Urabrask (video)
WUR Zedruu (video) (retired)
W Isamaru
UB Grimgrin
U Mistform Ultimus (video)
UBR Gwendlyn (video)
URG Animar (video)
RG Thromok
WB Selenia
Standard
WU Geist of Saint Traft standard EDH (video) (retired)
WUB Battle of Wits!
On a somewhat related note, we've got more than six judges for September for the first time in what seems like forever. Thank you, you beautiful people.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I think you should mention the wedges are WBR, URG, BGW, RWU and GUB.
(nameless one) 15 + 20 + 18 + 19 = 72
Antny223 24 + 23 + 21.5 + 22.5 = 91
doomfish 21.5 + 21 + 22 + 18 = 82.5
Marco 20.5 + 20 + 20 + 19 = 79.5
spezza19 24 + 21 + 22 + 21.5 = 88.5
Antny223 and spezza19 are duking it out for first place, and it's awesome.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
I don't think my scores change the current ranking any, still a win for Antny223. Congratulations!
Gratulations to Antny233, the simple cards are the way to go, something I felt I couldn't do with where I came from.
I thought like Anathema is indeed very white as it's a church thing.
And I found it was funny that aurorasparrow told me my idea was retroactively unoriginal. Damn you WotC!
My card ended up rather meh and the better card(s) won.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
—Eli Shiffrin, Rules Manager, on a design stacking lifelink instances
With GMom's scores, our results are as follows:
(nameless one) 15 + 20 + 18 + 19 + 18.5 = 90.5
Antny223 24 + 23 + 21.5 + 22.5 + 18 = 109
doomfish 21.5 + 21 + 22 + 18 + 20 = 102.5
Marco 20.5 + 20 + 20 + 19 + 18 = 97.5
spezza19 24 + 21 + 22 + 21.5 + 19 = 107.5
Congratulations, Antny223!
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
EDIT: Brackets are up.
EDIT: Judgements are up.
I know you already did your judgings, but we'll need to give a judge a break this month and redistribute his or her entries so that each remaining bracket has at least 5 entries in it.
Any judge volunteers?Actually, nevermind. RedLoa, my friend, you were the last judge to sign up for this month so you're the one that I'll redistribute. Enjoy your time off.Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Then again it doesn't look entirely serious.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
Multiple instances of lifelink on the same creature are redundant.
—Eli Shiffrin, Rules Manager, on a design stacking lifelink instances
OKAY! Slightly reworked brackets are up! Top Four advance. arbitraryarmor, this means one more card for you to judge. RedLoa, your judge entry is now a part of (nameless one)'s bracket.
Phew, I think we're back on track.
Glorious avatar and signature done by Rivenor at Miraculous Recovery Signatures.
***Former MCC Organizer***
Come join us! Show us your creative side.
I'm a proud member of the Online Campaign for Real English. If you believe in capital letters, correct spelling, and good sentence structure, then copy this into your signature.
Thank you very much!
Modern:WUSpiritsWU, R12 BoltR
Commander:Diamonds are a Girls Best Friend, Ace of Spades, I Love the Night, The Reaper
~Signature by: Miraculous Recovery Signatures~