Other side of the coin, I love all my cards. They're like babies. How can you not love your babies? Some may be disfigured and blind, overly frail, miscolored or too big for your liking but they're still your babies. love your babies!
Other side of the coin, I love all my cards. They're like babies. How can you not love your babies? Some may be disfigured and blind, overly frail, miscolored or too big for your liking but they're still your babies. love your babies!
QFT.
Though, with some of the card I've made I shouldn't be having children.
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
Have some confidance in yourself, theirs no guarantee whether you will win or lose until the judges have finished.
I know that, its just I really don't like the card. Last week I loved it, because you could do so much stuff. This one was too simple, and made it harder, + 2 trophies are intimidation
Right at the deadline...Does he always cut it that close?
Edit: Judging by the time of this post, looks like it's over.
Phantom edit: Not only did he post it with two minutes to spare, he even fixed it and uploaded a correction before the time was over. I'm a bit in awe.
So what happens with posts like Zarquan's with two separate cards in it?
And yes, no incantatrix for you. Or anyone. That class makes puppies cry. Mostly because they are the former Big Bads who have been Baleful Polymorphed into said puppies. By you. Because you're an incantatrix.
Quote from Yukora »
This is Deraxas we're talking about.
Remember, the girl that just killed an aspect of herself before literally consuming her?
Yeah, I don't see her handling a pissing match in any way other than a duel.
Quote from RedDwarfian »
Yes mistress...
Quote from About epic-level D&D »
There are only so many epic, psuedonatural barbarian/blackguard half-dragon akutenshai vampire balor paragons they can throw at you, right?
Quote from Concerning breeding habits of humans in fantasy games »
I suppose it's true. Though the logistics implied in a human/Great Wyrm Prismatic Dragon pairing makes me shudder.
...Something tells me that even should all arcane casters in the world unite, that the Grease spell would NOT be sufficient.
Well... you'll have to wait a bit more tapper. I'm going out tonight. Although the judgings are basically finished already... Trust that they'll be up around tomorrow... I'll flip a coin on what to write up first... Heads= you and 'bad. Tails are the other two. I'll have the first pair done by tonight and the second will have to wait 'til morning.
Bribe me and I may stay... In other news... <3 AoK for unlocking my set.
Kraj, dude, I'm trying to say this in the nicest way possible, but do you really think that a card that is completely mind-bogglingly complicated under the rules, and, more likely than not, doesn't even -work-, really deserves a 9.5? Granted, as a long-time player, I think Shinyman's card is neat (if a little unworkable under the rules), but if Rosewater is apprehensive about printing the word "Stack" on a card, imagine "subtype" on one? That's not even taking into consideration the fact that this card will pretty much singlehandedly cause rules manager Mark Gottlieb to jump off a bridge. And, while it's obviously not as major of an issue, the typo in the flavor text really irks me.
Ultimately I'm only posting an objection because I -really- would get upset if I actually lost a round because of art. My objections to the scoring of art have already been well voiced.
In any case, even if you don't correct my opponnent's score, a second round place and a 20 there is at least vaguely respectable.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
Kraj, dude, I'm trying to say this in the nicest way possible, but do you really think that a card that is completely mind-bogglingly complicated under the rules, and, more likely than not, doesn't even -work-, really deserves a 9.5?
I don't find it any more mind-boggling than Humility effects and I don't see any reason why it can't actually work. If any rules guru would like to explain either way I'd be grateful; there's plenty of time to adjust the judgings if necessary.
if Rosewater is apprehensive about printing the word "Stack" on a card, imagine "subtype" on one?
Now that's a fair point, but I think "subtype" is much comprehensible as a concept than "the stack" is. 182 cards in the game reference "type"; if players can handle "basic land type" and "creature type", I think they can handle subtype.
Ultimately I'm only posting an objection because I -really- would get upset if I actually lost a round because of art. My objections to the scoring of art have already been well voiced.
I find it odd that with all the feedback I gave you, you'd choose to chalk your loss up to art. Art that didn't suck would have made a difference, but so would have improving any of the other things I mentioned.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The Golden Rule of forums: If you're going to be rude, be right. If you might be wrong, be polite.
"Loses all subtypes" is very, very easy. The only weird stuff that'll come up is with Auras and Equipment, and the reminder text reminds that they fall.
"Subtype" is easier for new players to grok than "stack", since "subtype" must be some sort of breakdown of the type. And look, a shiny emdash! Everything after that must be a subtype. The stack, though... yurgh.
"Sufficiently advanced experience is indistinguishable from clairvoyance." -Carsten
"Ah those eyes, those horrible creepy eyes!" -Chaosof99
DCI Level 3 Judge & TO "I do not consider myself a hero. I know only what the Vec teach:
justice must always be served and corruption must always be opposed."
Go read! I am one of the three authors of Cranial Insertion.
But seriously, if you can't remember "Woapalanne", just call me Eli.
After thinking on it a bit I agree with most of your points. However, I definately think that the lack of reminder text on the basic land types issue is a huge deal. Another point is the clunkiness of having Auras just sitting in play attached to nothing: it feels extremely clunky. Ultimately, my opponents card just absolutely doesn't seem like something that would be printed: Wizards just wouldn't make something so counterintuitive and clunky.
I'm looking more at "what the card does" than "what its ability does". What does his card do? It hoses lands in an extremely inelegant and counterintuitive way, it hoses auras in an extremely inelegant way (there is no way that having an aura in play attached to nothing is at all elegant), and I guess it removes creature types from things in play? The ability seems neat and flashy but ultimately when it comes down to what it -does-, it's neat, I guess, but it definitely doesn't seem like it's worthy of being a half-point away from perfect.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
If people can understand licids, then that card is a cakewalk
They can't.
After all , ice cauldron took like 8 lines for what could have been done in 2 so wotc is hardly elegant
When did I ever say that Ice Cauldron was well-designed?
Holding up cards from over 10 years ago as how design works correctly now is extremely flawed.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
For the record, an Equipment that is also a creature cannot equip anything. >_> The clam card was funny, but just doesn't work. Try Tribal Artifact--Clam Equipment.
"Sufficiently advanced experience is indistinguishable from clairvoyance." -Carsten
"Ah those eyes, those horrible creepy eyes!" -Chaosof99
DCI Level 3 Judge & TO "I do not consider myself a hero. I know only what the Vec teach:
justice must always be served and corruption must always be opposed."
Go read! I am one of the three authors of Cranial Insertion.
But seriously, if you can't remember "Woapalanne", just call me Eli.
Other side of the coin, I love all my cards. They're like babies. How can you not love your babies? Some may be disfigured and blind, overly frail, miscolored or too big for your liking but they're still your babies. love your babies!
Forgotten Arts
QFT.
Though, with some of the card I've made I shouldn't be having children.
You know that Swirl the Mists is blue, right?
LOL AoK is a closet Mist Swirler! We all know the truth now!
Record: 3-2
Simpsons Mafia (Newbie) - Vanilla Mafia - Win
The Fiasco Corporation - Town Reporter - Loss
Doomsday Mafia - Mafia Roleblocker - Win
Battle Royale Mafia - Serial Daykiller - Loss
Danger City Mafia - Vanilla Town - Win
Le Gambit @ Aether did this banner
[NYC Dark Knights]
join today
Have some confidance in yourself, theirs no guarantee whether you will win or lose until the judges have finished.
I know that, its just I really don't like the card. Last week I loved it, because you could do so much stuff. This one was too simple, and made it harder, + 2 trophies are intimidation
Le Gambit @ Aether did this banner
[NYC Dark Knights]
join today
Forgotten Arts
U Twinsanity
WUBRG Reaper King
UBG Dredge
UR Howling Owl
GBU Thief of Time
Edit: Judging by the time of this post, looks like it's over.
Phantom edit: Not only did he post it with two minutes to spare, he even fixed it and uploaded a correction before the time was over. I'm a bit in awe.
So what happens with posts like Zarquan's with two separate cards in it?
I should broil you all right now.:mad:
Lesurgo's a master at getting his stuff in at the last minute- I think he does it so he can scope out the competition beforehand.
GAAAAH now the waiting....
"I am in the arcane, and the arcane is in me."
Official Matron Mother of Clan Planar Chaos
Awesome Avatar and signature by DarkNightCavalier
Deraxas, Dark Maiden of Shimia,, still oddly obsessed with a mindmage.
No kidding. The suspense is tapping me!
Record: 3-2
Simpsons Mafia (Newbie) - Vanilla Mafia - Win
The Fiasco Corporation - Town Reporter - Loss
Doomsday Mafia - Mafia Roleblocker - Win
Battle Royale Mafia - Serial Daykiller - Loss
Danger City Mafia - Vanilla Town - Win
Bribe me and I may stay... In other news... <3 AoK for unlocking my set.
Forgotten Arts
I'd tap that.
Gah, can't wait for judgings!
Current New Favorite Person™: Mallory Archer
She knows why.
Ultimately I'm only posting an objection because I -really- would get upset if I actually lost a round because of art. My objections to the scoring of art have already been well voiced.
In any case, even if you don't correct my opponnent's score, a second round place and a 20 there is at least vaguely respectable.
Like freeform roleplaying? Try Darkness Befalls Us
Ryttare Kelasin Luna Orelinalei
I don't find it any more mind-boggling than Humility effects and I don't see any reason why it can't actually work. If any rules guru would like to explain either way I'd be grateful; there's plenty of time to adjust the judgings if necessary.
I'm open to the possibility, but I have a huge pet peeve about claiming "rules nightmare" without providing any evidence to back up the claim.
Now that's a fair point, but I think "subtype" is much comprehensible as a concept than "the stack" is. 182 cards in the game reference "type"; if players can handle "basic land type" and "creature type", I think they can handle subtype.
I didn't notice that. As you said, though, it's not a major issue and not big enough for me to alter the score.
I find it odd that with all the feedback I gave you, you'd choose to chalk your loss up to art. Art that didn't suck would have made a difference, but so would have improving any of the other things I mentioned.
Current New Favorite Person™: Mallory Archer
She knows why.
"Subtype" is easier for new players to grok than "stack", since "subtype" must be some sort of breakdown of the type. And look, a shiny emdash! Everything after that must be a subtype.
"Sufficiently advanced experience is indistinguishable from clairvoyance." -Carsten
"Ah those eyes, those horrible creepy eyes!" -Chaosof99
DCI Level 3 Judge & TO
"I do not consider myself a hero. I know only what the Vec teach:
justice must always be served and corruption must always be opposed."
Go read! I am one of the three authors of Cranial Insertion.
But seriously, if you can't remember "Woapalanne", just call me Eli.
I'm looking more at "what the card does" than "what its ability does". What does his card do? It hoses lands in an extremely inelegant and counterintuitive way, it hoses auras in an extremely inelegant way (there is no way that having an aura in play attached to nothing is at all elegant), and I guess it removes creature types from things in play? The ability seems neat and flashy but ultimately when it comes down to what it -does-, it's neat, I guess, but it definitely doesn't seem like it's worthy of being a half-point away from perfect.
They can't.
When did I ever say that Ice Cauldron was well-designed?
Holding up cards from over 10 years ago as how design works correctly now is extremely flawed.
Judgings are done. I expect some heat, especially for the second match...
I totally see heat coming for the second match.
Edit: Congrats, AoK.
"Sufficiently advanced experience is indistinguishable from clairvoyance." -Carsten
"Ah those eyes, those horrible creepy eyes!" -Chaosof99
DCI Level 3 Judge & TO
"I do not consider myself a hero. I know only what the Vec teach:
justice must always be served and corruption must always be opposed."
Go read! I am one of the three authors of Cranial Insertion.
But seriously, if you can't remember "Woapalanne", just call me Eli.