KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Ok, so I'm confused on two things besides a town flip (if it's true). #1 If someone didn't hammer it would have been no lynch? I feel like when I played years ago a majority would suffice and if you wanted a no lynch you voted for it. #2 is discussion allowed at this point? I thought proph said a lynch happened. Do we get until the death post to talk?
@townAG: I bet your D1 lynch won't be in vain. I think there is a lot of info to be had from your lynch
@scumAG: Haha sucka!
is this a scum claim? Shouldn't you petitioning the scum to shoot you, not the vig?
..really? Why would I want to die if I were scum, this day was a scum's wet dream, especially if Hunt is scum(and he is). The scum aren't going to do me any favors, they're going to leave me around for people to potentially mislynch me.
Name: Ashweather Cett
Abilities: None
Gender: Male
Residence: Fadrex City
Ethnicity: Noble
Background:
Nobleman from Fadrex City. Has no Allomantic abilities to speak of, but is a skilled politician and leader. Is the head of House Cett, which is generally regarded amongst my noble peers as one of the lower houses due to their inability to produce Mistborn. Shrewd and cunning, enough to be a medium threat even though he has no means of harming me directly.
Welcome to Mistborn Mafia, AtheistGod! You are a Town Vanilla. You have no special abilities.
Win Condition: All the mafia must die.
It is now Night 1. Please send me night actions within 48 hours. We will start the Day on Thursday or Friday.
Half-skaa also known as the “Citizen”. Government officer in the city of Urteau who often wears skaa clothing in order to blend in well with the populace. Popular and friendly to ordinary skaa yet shows signs of being able to harness this popularity for nefarious ends. Possesses a bronze Hemalurgic spike in his upper arm that allows him to gain the powers of a Seeker*, which lets him know the location of every allomancer in Urteau. Has potential to become a more dangerous threat. Medium priority.
*Misting who can detect allomantic pulses by burning bronze
Welcome to Mistborn Mafia, Gentleman Johnny! You are a Town Vanilla. You have no special abilities.
Win Condition: All the mafia must die.
It is now Day 2. With 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch. The deadline is in twelve days.
I figured it after the night had started that I should've asked you to target Mindreaver instead to check it, but there's no use to cry over the spilt milk now...
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Why did you not join any wagon in that Deadline rush? Even if you don't know who is scum, you must have had some opinion about either the wagon targets, or the way people joined the wagons or something?
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Why did you not join any wagon in that Deadline rush? Even if you don't know who is scum, you must have had some opinion about either the wagon targets, or the way people joined the wagons or something?
I didn't feel like lynching either of the grape and Huntz. I don't really remember what I thought about AG back then...
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
@Cantrip: What did I do that makes you specifically feel like I was pocketing you? Can't say I was doing so intentionally, you were pretty disconnected from the game.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I'll bite. Tell me more about your vote. Why do you think my voting behaviour is more likely to be scummy as opposed to be NAI, especially when it's me we are talking about?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
I'll bite. Tell me more about your vote. Why do you think my voting behaviour is more likely to be scummy as opposed to be NAI, especially when it's me we are talking about?
Lets see. I think the best answer to this questiom is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I'll bite. Tell me more about your vote. Why do you think my voting behaviour is more likely to be scummy as opposed to be NAI, especially when it's me we are talking about?
Lets see. I think the best answer to this questiom is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Some part of me wishes that you'd get vigged. Another part of me is sad since I doubt it'll happen.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
I'll bite. Tell me more about your vote. Why do you think my voting behaviour is more likely to be scummy as opposed to be NAI, especially when it's me we are talking about?
Lets see. I think the best answer to this questiom is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Some part of me wishes that you'd get vigged. Another part of me is sad since I doubt it'll happen.
Based on what? Snarkiness? Not only did you not commit to one of the wagons yesterday (of which one is very likely to be scum) you can't even tell me who on the wagon of people you 'didn't want to lynch' (the reason for which I assume is some level of town read) is scummiest. You don't appear to be trying to figure out anyone's alignment and the reason you appear to be giving me is 'because you're Bur'. Like, seriously?
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
@Bur Do you have strong stances on anyone or any of the events in this thread? Because your play this game has felt pretty wishy-washy all game.
Agree with Cantrip that I'm glad I don't have to worry about GJ's alignment anymore.
Strong stances? Not really. Some kind of stances? Yes.
Town?
Rhand - I recall having several mindmeld moments with him
Gruffin - Mindmeld (though not as much as I had with Rhand)
Mindreaver - Claim + not having a counterwagon
shadow - I liked how he displayed paranoia in regards of me early this game + something else I don't remember right now
Rodemy - gut feeling
Grape/Hunt - I should clear this mess today
SJT - I recall he had a post or two that felt icky, but besides that I don't remember anything he's done in this game.
Cyan - I dislike how pretty much all of his posts are "I dislike this thing X". Only thing he has likes is Cantrip early in the game.
I'll bite. Tell me more about your vote. Why do you think my voting behaviour is more likely to be scummy as opposed to be NAI, especially when it's me we are talking about?
Lets see. I think the best answer to this questiom is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Some part of me wishes that you'd get vigged. Another part of me is sad since I doubt it'll happen.
Based on what? Snarkiness? Not only did you not commit to one of the wagons yesterday (of which one is very likely to be scum) you can't even tell me who on the wagon of people you 'didn't want to lynch' (the reason for which I assume is some level of town read) is scummiest. You don't appear to be trying to figure out anyone's alignment and the reason you appear to be giving me is 'because you're Bur'. Like, seriously?
Now, that's much better.
I actually have a question for you: Let's assume you could ask Proph to confirm any single person's alignment publicly on this thread. Who would you pick and why?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
Cyan - I dislike how pretty much all of his posts are "I dislike this thing X". Only thing he has likes is Cantrip early in the game.
Nah. I also called Rhand town early in the game IIRC, and I definitely said that I thought GJ was town, which has now been proven correct.
Actually, let's ask you the same question: You could ask Proph to confirm the alignment of any single player in this game. Who would you choose and why?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
@Bur: Probably Rhand. I'm basically praypocketing him at this point int the game. He looks like he's trying to solve it, but that's just how he plays and he could absolutely be scum right now.
Why did you not want to lynch either of Grape or Hunt?
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
@Bur: Probably Rhand. I'm basically praypocketing him at this point int the game. He looks like he's trying to solve it, but that's just how he plays and he could absolutely be scum right now.
Why did you not want to lynch either of Grape or Hunt?
Since I had hard time making up my mind I wanted to shadow to check whether grape was being honest or not. Though, I realised few holes in that plan... >_>
But, since if grape is being honest about his claim, he's town. I doubt scum has any protective roles in this game.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Cyan - I dislike how pretty much all of his posts are "I dislike this thing X". Only thing he has likes is Cantrip early in the game.
Nah. I also called Rhand town early in the game IIRC, and I definitely said that I thought GJ was town, which has now been proven correct.
Actually, let's ask you the same question: You could ask Proph to confirm the alignment of any single player in this game. Who would you choose and why?
I would snap choose Huntzilla for reasons that should be extremely obvious.
Can't say I was doing so intentionally, you were pretty disconnected from the game.
Disconnected is probably the wrong word. Disengaged would be more accurate, though he explained that that was due to real life, so it isn't something I'm worried about.
People I actually thought about pocketing: GJ, cause I got a town feel from him early, and I know how much he hates people trying to pocket him; and Grapefruit, though he's not clear enough town for me to hard pursue that.
Also, Grapefruit should probably claim his targets.
And I'm awaiting Mindreaver as well.
Targeted Mindreaver, Rodemy, and Myself. Mind now has no excuse not to clear himself via his role so I'm waiting on that.
Well, thank you
So, I'm in kind of a weird spot. My ability is, for lack of a better term, Vanilla Town Cop. I either get the result of "Vanilla Town" or "Not Vanilla Town". My target last night, was not VT. So either I'm going to out a PR, or I found scum. I want to wait a little bit, and see how the day goes before I reveal the target. As I might get a better sense for which I've found, and it takes potential fake VT claims off the table for scum.
Targeted Mindreaver, Rodemy, and Myself. Mind now has no excuse not to clear himself via his role so I'm waiting on that.
Well, thank you
So, I'm in kind of a weird spot. My ability is, for lack of a better term, Vanilla Town Cop. I either get the result of "Vanilla Town" or "Not Vanilla Town". My target last night, was not VT. So either I'm going to out a PR, or I found scum. I want to wait a little bit, and see how the day goes before I reveal the target. As I might get a better sense for which I've found, and it takes potential fake VT claims off the table for scum.
I wouldn't call that "a role that will confirm me as town", but oh well. You are still town, so w/e.
(Just for the future: "Confirmable role" is a role where your actions can be confirmed by other players, eg. Innocent Child, Vig, Doublevoter etc.)
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
@Huntzilla: Now that you are here, please answer the same question: If you could have the alignment of a single player publicly revealed by Proph, who'd you choose and why?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Prophylaxis »
Also modgaming Bur setups is kind of treading down a dark path
I'll do that over night. I think there's scum in all that wagon talk somewhere.
If you're out there, please put me out of my misery. This is the worst Day 1 I have ever seen.
@townAG: I bet your D1 lynch won't be in vain. I think there is a lot of info to be had from your lynch
@scumAG: Haha sucka!
..really? Why would I want to die if I were scum, this day was a scum's wet dream, especially if Hunt is scum(and he is). The scum aren't going to do me any favors, they're going to leave me around for people to potentially mislynch me.
ASHWEATHER CETT - AtheistGod
*********************************************************
DOSSIER:
Name: Ashweather Cett
Abilities: None
Gender: Male
Residence: Fadrex City
Ethnicity: Noble
Background:
Welcome to Mistborn Mafia, AtheistGod! You are a Town Vanilla. You have no special abilities.
Win Condition: All the mafia must die.
It is now Night 1. Please send me night actions within 48 hours. We will start the Day on Thursday or Friday.
(I will update all flavor tomorrow!)
Gentleman Johnny has been killed.
QUELLION - Gentleman Johnny
*********************************************************
DOSSIER:
Name: Quellion
Abilities: Seeker
Gender: Male
Residence: Urteau
Ethnicity: Half-skaa
Background:
Welcome to Mistborn Mafia, Gentleman Johnny! You are a Town Vanilla. You have no special abilities.
Win Condition: All the mafia must die.
It is now Day 2. With 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch. The deadline is in twelve days.
I figured it after the night had started that I should've asked you to target Mindreaver instead to check it, but there's no use to cry over the spilt milk now...
@Bur: Who do you think is scum and why?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I dislike Cyan's post, but his posts like "Please vig me" have made me reconsider...
Other than that, I don't really have any good leads...
Any chance you're a Miller? Like, in the result of a cop investigation on you... your alignment comes up as scum, but you're actually town?
If I were Miller, I would've claimed already D1.
Why did you not join any wagon in that Deadline rush? Even if you don't know who is scum, you must have had some opinion about either the wagon targets, or the way people joined the wagons or something?
I didn't feel like lynching either of the grape and Huntz. I don't really remember what I thought about AG back then...
I think I support pressure on Bur, but I'd rather reread first.
I disagree that Cyan's "please vig me" posts necessarily point to him being town. I think it's just as likely that he's gambiting.
@Cyan: Why did you say this game was boring? What makes a mafia game "interesting" in your eyes?
@Rodemy: I believe you seconded the "boringness" of this game; same question: what makes a mafia game "interesting" to you?
I'm very glad that I don't have to question Gentleman Johnny's alignment anymore.
I will be rereading as time permits, but weekends are my busy time. I promise to contribute toDay, though.
@Cantrip: What did I do that makes you specifically feel like I was pocketing you? Can't say I was doing so intentionally, you were pretty disconnected from the game.
Also, I'm not reading Cantrip as disconnected, so IDK what you're getting at there.
I'll bite. Tell me more about your vote. Why do you think my voting behaviour is more likely to be scummy as opposed to be NAI, especially when it's me we are talking about?
Some part of me wishes that you'd get vigged. Another part of me is sad since I doubt it'll happen.
Agree with Cantrip that I'm glad I don't have to worry about GJ's alignment anymore.
Strong stances? Not really. Some kind of stances? Yes.
Town?
Rhand - I recall having several mindmeld moments with him
Gruffin - Mindmeld (though not as much as I had with Rhand)
Mindreaver - Claim + not having a counterwagon
shadow - I liked how he displayed paranoia in regards of me early this game + something else I don't remember right now
Rodemy - gut feeling
Grape/Hunt - I should clear this mess today
SJT - I recall he had a post or two that felt icky, but besides that I don't remember anything he's done in this game.
Cyan - I dislike how pretty much all of his posts are "I dislike this thing X". Only thing he has likes is Cantrip early in the game.
Now, that's much better.
I actually have a question for you: Let's assume you could ask Proph to confirm any single person's alignment publicly on this thread. Who would you pick and why?
Nah. I also called Rhand town early in the game IIRC, and I definitely said that I thought GJ was town, which has now been proven correct.
Actually, let's ask you the same question: You could ask Proph to confirm the alignment of any single player in this game. Who would you choose and why?
Why did you not want to lynch either of Grape or Hunt?
Since I had hard time making up my mind I wanted to shadow to check whether grape was being honest or not. Though, I realised few holes in that plan... >_>
But, since if grape is being honest about his claim, he's town. I doubt scum has any protective roles in this game.
Both of those roles on town feels weird, yes.
Hmm.
What do you think of shadows vote on you?
I would snap choose Huntzilla for reasons that should be extremely obvious.
People I actually thought about pocketing: GJ, cause I got a town feel from him early, and I know how much he hates people trying to pocket him; and Grapefruit, though he's not clear enough town for me to hard pursue that.
Also, Grapefruit should probably claim his targets.
And I'm awaiting Mindreaver as well.
He's going to be a subject of scrutiny for the rest of the game, and is never going to be killable any other way.
Plus, it helps shed light on Grapefruit as well, IMO.
waiting
waiting on the roles to claim
Digging Grape's targets.
@KJ: why continue the pressure on Bur when he didn't fall for your trap here?
Wouldn't scum!Bur be a lot more careful in his answer?
So, I'm in kind of a weird spot. My ability is, for lack of a better term, Vanilla Town Cop. I either get the result of "Vanilla Town" or "Not Vanilla Town". My target last night, was not VT. So either I'm going to out a PR, or I found scum. I want to wait a little bit, and see how the day goes before I reveal the target. As I might get a better sense for which I've found, and it takes potential fake VT claims off the table for scum.
I wouldn't call that "a role that will confirm me as town", but oh well. You are still town, so w/e.
(Just for the future: "Confirmable role" is a role where your actions can be confirmed by other players, eg. Innocent Child, Vig, Doublevoter etc.)
You wanted questions answered correct?