You have no abilities other than your vote, and you win when all the threats to the town are eliminated.
Key rules to remember:
1). A day can have any number of lynches. When a player is lynched, they are removed from the game, but their alignment will not be revealed until the end of the phase. The votecount resets after all lynches.
2). This game is all vanilla. There are no PRs on either side.
3). The deadline is only 120 hours for the day phase, and 24 hours for the night phase so use your time wisely.
4). You are expected to make a bare minimum of 5 posts within a day phase, or at least one post per 24 hours, due to the structure and pace of the game.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Okay, so regardless of how many we lynch day one, I don't think we should go past day 2, giving the scum more than a single kill seems like a really bad plan.
I think two on the first day, then go for broke on the second if we haven't won yet.
Two dead plus one night kill means if we don't even get a single scum d1 then we still have d2 to discuss wagons and such. Any more then that and we could theoretically lost after night.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I think two on the first day, then go for broke on the second if we haven't won yet.
Two dead plus one night kill means if we don't even get a single scum d1 then we still have d2 to discuss wagons and such. Any more then that and we could theoretically lost after night.
Actually to add onto this, if we lynch 2 today, and don't hit any scum, we lynch 1 and then if we don't lose, we should go to night and then be at 2-1 on day 3.
I think two on the first day, then go for broke on the second if we haven't won yet.
Two dead plus one night kill means if we don't even get a single scum d1 then we still have d2 to discuss wagons and such. Any more then that and we could theoretically lost after night.
Actually to add onto this, if we lynch 2 today, and don't hit any scum, we lynch 1 and then if we don't lose, we should go to night and then be at 2-1 on day 3.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I think two on the first day, then go for broke on the second if we haven't won yet.
Two dead plus one night kill means if we don't even get a single scum d1 then we still have d2 to discuss wagons and such. Any more then that and we could theoretically lost after night.
Actually to add onto this, if we lynch 2 today, and don't hit any scum, we lynch 1 and then if we don't lose, we should go to night and then be at 2-1 on day 3.
As much as I'd love to run with Tom's "lynch 4" plan, I agree that it's really akin to a coin toss (yes, a lightly informed coin toss, but my D1 reads are never as strong as my reads after a flip or two). I think the Killjoy/Shadow plan is a good one.
It's funny how people think I'm serious about that.
Already proposed the serious plan. This wasn't it.
I concur that Killjoy needs scrutiny/pressure. He joked, then got serious, then joked again, including a "vote for someone outside the game" tell. It's five to lynch, right?
Vote: Killjoy
Claim pls.
Yes, I know we're all vanilla. I'm not actually expecting a claim. But yes, this is a serious vote.
@Megiddo: I'm currently in another game where the lack of flips is driving me crazy. As fun as that freefall-from-space plan sounds, I'd rather have a few flips/wagons to help me in my reads.
Well Killjoy is now lurking to survive. His comments were meant to be I wasn't taking the game seriously and you guys are voting me wth. But he isn't really trying to stop his own lynch. Sort of reads like scum to me.
I think Killjoy has a much>random chance at being scum (pretty much for exactly what DV said). But I think that if he's scum, his buddy would be silly not to get in on him early for the cred he can get.
Yup, I assumed as much. Though I really liked DV's response so I don't particularly want to wagon him.
Vote Cantrip
is this still looking for who bussed KJ?
Yup
why cantrip over me?
His reaction to you felt incredibly not like a scum buddy reaction. Your Pokemon gif could come from either, but when we do see flips, Killjoy being scum makes you pretty solidly town.
2. D_V
3. Megiddo
4. zomgarcwind
5. Cantripmancer
6. tomsloger
7. Anaklusmos
8. Killjoy
Pms being sent out.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
You have no abilities other than your vote, and you win when all the threats to the town are eliminated.
Key rules to remember:
1). A day can have any number of lynches. When a player is lynched, they are removed from the game, but their alignment will not be revealed until the end of the phase. The votecount resets after all lynches.
2). This game is all vanilla. There are no PRs on either side.
3). The deadline is only 120 hours for the day phase, and 24 hours for the night phase so use your time wisely.
4). You are expected to make a bare minimum of 5 posts within a day phase, or at least one post per 24 hours, due to the structure and pace of the game.
5). Always remember to have fun!
Awaiting confirmations.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
Let the battle begin.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
i say 4
Two dead plus one night kill means if we don't even get a single scum d1 then we still have d2 to discuss wagons and such. Any more then that and we could theoretically lost after night.
nk. final 3 tomorrow.
if we get all 4 wrong, lol us
vote: killjoy
Uh oh. Tom Ketchem just turned his hat backwards.
It's a coin flip though. Is risky.
Oh right duh, that's pretty important.
The mod first. No mods means everyone wins.
Already proposed the serious plan. This wasn't it.
who thinks youre serious about it?
As much as I'd love to run with Tom's "lynch 4" plan, I agree that it's really akin to a coin toss (yes, a lightly informed coin toss, but my D1 reads are never as strong as my reads after a flip or two). I think the Killjoy/Shadow plan is a good one.
Why 3? If we lynch only town, we'll end the Day at 3-2, scum NK and it's game. I'd rather lynch 2 or *maybe* 4 D1.
I concur that Killjoy needs scrutiny/pressure. He joked, then got serious, then joked again, including a "vote for someone outside the game" tell. It's five to lynch, right?
Vote: Killjoy
Claim pls.
2 Lynches
2 town: Go to day 2 with a 2 a 3-2 split, lynch 1 and either lose or go to day 3 with a 2-1 split.
1 town, 1 scum: Go to day 2 with a 4-1 split, chain lynch until we hit scum (no point in seeing flips anymore)
2 scum: Heh
___________________________________________
4 Lynches
4 town: GG
3 town, 1 scum: Go to day 2 with a 2-1 split.
2 town, 2 scum: Yay us.
Overall, for flips sake (ha, pun) I think 2 is my preferred, but I could be persuaded to 4.
______________________________
@Zomg: why did you say 3?
Killjoy (3): tomsloger, D_V, Cantripmancer (L-2)
Not Voting (5) Killjoy, zomgarcwind, shadowlancerx, Megiddo, Anaklusmos
99 hours remain.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
Vote DV
Poke. Talk to me about Killjoy.
Well Killjoy is now lurking to survive. His comments were meant to be I wasn't taking the game seriously and you guys are voting me wth. But he isn't really trying to stop his own lynch. Sort of reads like scum to me.
and DV, why didnt you ask that?
weve only got a couple of days and 4 lynches to make happen
You read my mind.
NO BRAKES
vote shadow
what now?
Cause Shadows obv scum mate.
Vote Shadow
Vote Cantrip
NO BRAKES