Second Vote: Shadow @#655. This actually appears to technically be the first vote (or the vote that should appear first given that both Manders and GJ had voted and unvoted Bur previously, but Az was still listing it as the second vote. Whatever.) This vote reads like a pure pressure vote. Trying to get Bur to contribute. Looking back, Bur was already in Shadow's scumpile, again largely for lack of posting. So the vote is largely consistent with his prior posts. I don't have any issues with this vote.
Third Vote: Anak @755. The only player with fewer posts than me. This vote is bad. Anak seems to know it's bad. Bur had claimed at this point (after being prodded for inactivity) And this is essentially a wagon vote. He just says the claim does nothing "to dissuade" him. Though looking back, Anak has said precisely jack squat about Bur prior to this. So this really feels like an opportunistic hop from Anak.
Fourth Vote: Seppel @793. "I like Anak." (there was a discussion going on as to who was scummier between Bur and Anak.) Seppel, of course, was voting Anak himself literally one post earlier (@772). Anak made a grand total of 1 post between these two posts. I already don't like Seppel because I think he's lying about something and even if he's not lying, he's not helping the town. This vote doesn't do anything to make me feel better about Seppel.
Fifth vote was Tordeck. Town.
Sixth vote was Iso. Scum.
Seventh Vote: DV @1049. Except, this wasn't the Seventh vote. This was the Fifth vote, and Iso and Tordeck piled on immediately after (Iso being 6 and Tordeck being 7).
Aside: Az, I am dissappoint with the accuracy of these vote counts. The order this stuff happens in actually matters man!
DV's vote was a vote that appeared to be trying to get something going, re: his "we nowhere near anything" comment. As such, I actually am much more okay with it.
Eighth Vote was Bur on himself. I want to say something snarky. I'll refrain.
Ninth Vote: Manders @1055. Immediately drops the hammer on Bur after his self vote. I'm agreeing with people who said this happened too fast, but I'm not convinced this was a super scummy vote. Manders had previously voted for Bur several times D1. Her opinion on him was well known. Arguably, the self-vote was Bur giving up as scum. It did bear a passing resemblance to the kind of self vote a scum might make on his way out - but only when he's dropping the actual hammer on himself. Not quite the same when he's putting himself at L-1. Anyway, this vote isn't the best, but it's not the worst either.
The worst looking (among the alive people) are GJ, Anak and Seppel.
It's only one datapoint. Doing the Iso lynch would be the second and probably more significant anyway, which I'd like to do. But that is definitely not happening tonight, and likely not tomorrow either.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
Oh man, I forgot about axels post about the gj vote.
Click that link, then look at gj's progression yesterday (seppel instead of this iso wagon>ok maybe both>oh yeah I am on this iso wagon yup)
As for the Iso lynch, yeah, he railed at everyone, but I still maintain the case on Iso was bull*****. He had nothing but meta on him. Yeah, he was right, but it's really easy to be right when you're bussing.
Though I will add that Cythare's post where he voted me was concerning for the reasons I pointed out. (Misrepped information)
I misrepped you? Your logic for voting him based off thinking Tordeck was the D1 lynch seems like a stretch. His response just looks like a heated/knee-jerk reaction to your post where he just didn't take the time to fact check before posting. I don't see how this is scummy - it looks like it's alignment-agnostic to me.
Re: the Seppel thing: Idk about your detrimental truthfulness. In a vacuum, lying about it would make sense to me, but I don't know your style.
As for the Iso lynch, yeah, he railed at everyone, but I still maintain the case on Iso was bull*****. He had nothing but meta on him. Yeah, he was right, but it's really easy to be right when you're bussing.
So I was bussing Iso too? Checkmate.
Uh, yeah, I believe you were now. Based on the FACT that you are not playing to your claimed win-con, I believe you came into the game, decided to pull some tomfoolery, and your brother decided to call you out on it. (Iso was adamant that Seppel was lying about being Neutral from the beginning.) So you saw an opportunity to take him out and you took it.
The only other thing that makes sense is you REALLY don't give a crap about this game or winning, which is also likely, but I'm willing to bet it is the former, not the latter.
Though I will add that Cythare's post where he voted me was concerning for the reasons I pointed out. (Misrepped information)
I misrepped you? Your logic for voting him based off thinking Tordeck was the D1 lynch seems like a stretch. His response just looks like a heated/knee-jerk reaction to your post where he just didn't take the time to fact check before posting. I don't see how this is scummy - it looks like it's alignment-agnostic to me.
That is not why I voted him. It was one symptom.
In my re-read (which I am continuing), I'm seeing a lot out of you of this ilk: where you subtly modify what others have said/done to fit your stance. This, alone, is NAI, but it should be noted.
Re: the Seppel thing: Idk about your detrimental truthfulness. In a vacuum, lying about it would make sense to me, but I don't know your style.
Well, duh. We've never played together.
Why don't you ask Seppel about this? Why are you only asking me?
Though I will add that Cythare's post where he voted me was concerning for the reasons I pointed out. (Misrepped information)
I misrepped you? Your logic for voting him based off thinking Tordeck was the D1 lynch seems like a stretch. His response just looks like a heated/knee-jerk reaction to your post where he just didn't take the time to fact check before posting. I don't see how this is scummy - it looks like it's alignment-agnostic to me.
That is not why I voted him. It was one symptom.
In my re-read (which I am continuing), I'm seeing a lot out of you of this ilk: where you subtly modify what others have said/done to fit your stance. This, alone, is NAI, but it should be noted.
I recognize that you also said that you were 200 posts into rereading, but don't provide any actual reasons from the review that indicate your thought process here. Between the timing and the language of your post, the "I'm rereading him" looks like an afterthought to his Tordeck/Bur flub.
Re: the Seppel thing: Idk about your detrimental truthfulness. In a vacuum, lying about it would make sense to me, but I don't know your style.
Well, duh. We've never played together.
Why don't you ask Seppel about this? Why are you only asking me?
I'm not asking you, you informed me. My intial statement "I'm not sure why you're surprised that Seppel didn't take you at your word." was rhetorical, because of course you don't take someone you think is scum at their word.
Though I will add that Cythare's post where he voted me was concerning for the reasons I pointed out. (Misrepped information)
I misrepped you? Your logic for voting him based off thinking Tordeck was the D1 lynch seems like a stretch. His response just looks like a heated/knee-jerk reaction to your post where he just didn't take the time to fact check before posting. I don't see how this is scummy - it looks like it's alignment-agnostic to me.
That is not why I voted him. It was one symptom.
In my re-read (which I am continuing), I'm seeing a lot out of you of this ilk: where you subtly modify what others have said/done to fit your stance. This, alone, is NAI, but it should be noted.
I recognize that you also said that you were 200 posts into rereading, but don't provide any actual reasons from the review that indicate your thought process here. Between the timing and the language of your post, the "I'm rereading him" looks like an afterthought to his Tordeck/Bur flub.
Where did I say I was re-reading Cyan? I'm re-reading the whole game (and am on page 16 now) and was talking about you in the bolded portion.
Re: the Seppel thing: Idk about your detrimental truthfulness. In a vacuum, lying about it would make sense to me, but I don't know your style.
Well, duh. We've never played together.
Why don't you ask Seppel about this? Why are you only asking me?
I'm not asking you, you informed me. My intial statement "I'm not sure why you're surprised that Seppel didn't take you at your word." was rhetorical, because of course you don't take someone you think is scum at their word.
You asked me why he should believe me. I told you why, but that wasn't good enough for you.
@ Seppel: I suppose the answer to my earlier question, why it is that you targeted me last night, is that you are not paying attention to who has claimed what. But, you know what's interesting? I'm the only one who claimed whether they did or not. I'll check again in my re-read, but I don't recall anyone else (and I'm far past where you claimed and no one else volunteered their information).
How can you justify this action? It is NOT too much to ask for you to remember one person who said that they didn't have one. I do not believe you didn't believe me for two reasons: 1) the reason I already gave Cythare. It would have made zero sense for me to lie about that when I volunteered the information ESPECIALLY since I don't lie, regardless of alignment, if I don't have to. and 2) You thought I was Town at the time I volunteered the information.
Though I will add that Cythare's post where he voted me was concerning for the reasons I pointed out. (Misrepped information)
I misrepped you? Your logic for voting him based off thinking Tordeck was the D1 lynch seems like a stretch. His response just looks like a heated/knee-jerk reaction to your post where he just didn't take the time to fact check before posting. I don't see how this is scummy - it looks like it's alignment-agnostic to me.
That is not why I voted him. It was one symptom.
In my re-read (which I am continuing), I'm seeing a lot out of you of this ilk: where you subtly modify what others have said/done to fit your stance. This, alone, is NAI, but it should be noted.
I recognize that you also said that you were 200 posts into rereading, but don't provide any actual reasons from the review that indicate your thought process here. Between the timing and the language of your post, the "I'm rereading him" looks like an afterthought to his Tordeck/Bur flub.
Where did I say I was re-reading Cyan? I'm re-reading the whole game (and am on page 16 now) and was talking about you in the bolded portion.
No, I get that you're doing a full reread and are addressing me in the bolded part. I was circling back to the only other thing that you stated in your post that would indicate why you might have changed your stance on Cyan.
I don't really have anything to say about what you said about me.
Re: the Seppel thing: Idk about your detrimental truthfulness. In a vacuum, lying about it would make sense to me, but I don't know your style.
Well, duh. We've never played together.
Why don't you ask Seppel about this? Why are you only asking me?
I'm not asking you, you informed me. My intial statement "I'm not sure why you're surprised that Seppel didn't take you at your word." was rhetorical, because of course you don't take someone you think is scum at their word.
You asked me why he should believe me. I told you why, but that wasn't good enough for you.
It's not that your answer isn't good enough - it's that I wasn't looking for an answer, for the reasons I've stated. It just seemed like a basic thing to not take someone you're scumreading at their word. I'm not sure why you're getting frustrated about this - it's not a personal slight.
No, I get that you're doing a full reread and are addressing me in the bolded part. I was circling back to the only other thing that you stated in your post that would indicate why you might have changed your stance on Cyan.
I don't really have anything to say about what you said about me.
So are you wanting to know why I changed my mind about Cyan being Scum? I'm so confused...
No, I get that you're doing a full reread and are addressing me in the bolded part. I was circling back to the only other thing that you stated in your post that would indicate why you might have changed your stance on Cyan.
I don't really have anything to say about what you said about me.
So are you wanting to know why I changed my mind about Cyan being Scum? I'm so confused...
Yes, I want to understand what led to your change from saying he's Town to saying he's Scum, because otherwise it just looks like an about-face that is missing concrete reasons.
No, I get that you're doing a full reread and are addressing me in the bolded part. I was circling back to the only other thing that you stated in your post that would indicate why you might have changed your stance on Cyan.
I don't really have anything to say about what you said about me.
So are you wanting to know why I changed my mind about Cyan being Scum? I'm so confused...
Yes, I want to understand what led to your change from saying he's Town to saying he's Scum, because otherwise it just looks like an about-face that is missing concrete reasons.
That happened Yesterday, but it's 100% because I felt his "case" on Iso was crap. I still feel that way (despite Iso being Scum), but the fact that he hesitated at the speed of my wagon AND unvoted because of it has him cemented 100% Town in my eyes. If Cyan was Scum trying to push a mislynch, like I thought, there's no ******* way he would back off of it when he pushed me to the point of giving up and voting myself, especially since I put myself at L-2. He would have waved it off as Scum and pushed harder.
Call it whatever you want, but this is fact and Cyan is now Town.
Still town
Nothing new to really to say
Manders self vote should be auto lynch. I don't think she tries that though as a wolf, especially after Bur did it and got lynched.
The only other thing that makes sense is you REALLY don't give a crap about this game or winning, which is also likely, but I'm willing to bet it is the former, not the latter.
Ive screwed up so badly this game. It's likely irreparable for me. I just have to hope for a 3-way.
Dearest seppel,
No one has flipped with a passive ability.
No one has claimed a passive ability.
In fact we now know that bur, iso, tordeck, and chris had no passives.
DV and manders probably not
I have no passives.
Seems like wildfire doesnt.
Feel pretty good about cythare not having any.
Dearest seppel,
No one has flipped with a passive ability.
No one has claimed a passive ability.
In fact we now know that bur, iso, tordeck, and chris had no passives.
DV and manders probably not
I have no passives.
Seems like wildfire doesnt.
Feel pretty good about cythare not having any.
So....
What would you do about you?
Chris had a passive double vote, Iso's role PM confirmed the existence of Unlynchable. P.sure someone claimed bodyguard at some point.
But thanks for compiling the info that I should have been compiling since D1.
With any luck, there's only like 3 passives in the game and it's a lot easier for me to win than previously expected.
FWIW, If MH were scum here, I would expect her to have just doubled-down on her 'suspicion' of me when I unvoted her. I genuinely think she is town now.
Anak, GJ, and Iso are at the top of my scum list currently. I'm re-reading the latter 2.
FWIW, If MH were scum here, I would expect her to have just doubled-down on her 'suspicion' of me when I unvoted her. I genuinely think she is town now.
Anak, GJ, and Iso are at the top of my scum list currently. I'm re-reading the latter 2.
Iso's already gone, dude. Though, by all means, re-read away. I think his opinions on Axelrod lean heavily towards Axel being Town.
It was too busy at work to do any re-reading, but my schedule for Saturday freed up for the most part, so yay. I should finish it this weekend.
@Seppel I don't have any passives, to save you the trouble. Did you ever my point about you claiming to trade passives? I didn't make that up right, and assuming I didn't, who did you trade with Manders last night?
I still maintain MH is scum, but looks like I should go investigate GJ some more. Both cyan and MH concluding they are suddenly town is lol, no way they do that as scummates I don't think. Sticking with Cyan being genuine about it and MH going along because it relieves pressure. Her last paragraph above feels so fake, in particular
@Seppel I don't have any passives, to save you the trouble. Did you ever my point about you claiming to trade passives? I didn't make that up right, and assuming I didn't, who did you trade with Manders last night?
I still maintain MH is scum, but looks like I should go investigate GJ some more. Both cyan and MH concluding they are suddenly town is lol, no way they do that as scummates I don't think. Sticking with Cyan being genuine about it and MH going along because it relieves pressure. Her last paragraph above feels so fake, in particular
Uh, you realize I cleared Cyan first, right? Can't really "go along with" something that hadn't happened yet.
Everyone should review Anak's posts. He's constantly talking about how things "feel" rather than how they "are" as he just did. Classic scumtell, not wanting to commit TOO hard to anything.
And what paragraph, in particular, are you referring to? Where I say Cyan and I read each other's reactions? That's a ******* fact, proven time and time again seeing as how Cyan and I have played OODLES of games together.
Please explain how I am not committing to hard to my read on you.
Also the statement, "analyzing our reactions to situations", is a nothing sentence. That doesn't mean anything, is why it feels so fake. What isn't analyzing reactions to situations?
Unless DV flips actual scum here, which I do not think is going to happen, Wildfire probably needs instant death. That choice was so awful, especially under the circumstances, I simply cannot imagine it coming from Town.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
If you want to come and explain yourself, WF, this would be the time. The fact you just did that on your own, in that way, is part of what makes you look terrible.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
I am currently assuming that scum tried to kill DV last night, failed, and this is how they are now trying to kill him.
That could be totally wrong, but feels right.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
What are you talking about? Obviously I am confirmed Townie #1.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
I'm pretty baffled right now. Agreed that D_V is Townie #1, but I'm surprised that Wildfire is openly claiming scum. It's worth noting that Wildfire did have D_V in his "likely scum" bucket from a month ago, but...yeah.
Well, as I am, in fact, Townie, you would appear to be 100% wrong.
This is not a surprise.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
Start being townie then. Why did you give Wildfire any benefit of the doubt when he's effectively claiming scum? And why did you not recognize DV as 100% town?
Well, let's see, I said the choice was awful and WF probably needed instant death for it. Yes, I said "probably." Because I am not a knee-jerk reacting idiot (that is not meant as a personal insult, btw). I want to see DV's flip and I would like to hear WF explain himself. I do not believe that either of those things are going to change my opinion on WF instant death, but, you know, who knows?
And, I'm pretty sure I've had DV trending towards the top of my list of Townies for a long time now, so I don't know what your on about that.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I'm second-guessing everything now.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Previous post on GJ vote: My conclusion: not great.
Second Vote: Shadow @#655. This actually appears to technically be the first vote (or the vote that should appear first given that both Manders and GJ had voted and unvoted Bur previously, but Az was still listing it as the second vote. Whatever.) This vote reads like a pure pressure vote. Trying to get Bur to contribute. Looking back, Bur was already in Shadow's scumpile, again largely for lack of posting. So the vote is largely consistent with his prior posts. I don't have any issues with this vote.
Third Vote: Anak @755. The only player with fewer posts than me. This vote is bad. Anak seems to know it's bad. Bur had claimed at this point (after being prodded for inactivity) And this is essentially a wagon vote. He just says the claim does nothing "to dissuade" him. Though looking back, Anak has said precisely jack squat about Bur prior to this. So this really feels like an opportunistic hop from Anak.
Fourth Vote: Seppel @793. "I like Anak." (there was a discussion going on as to who was scummier between Bur and Anak.) Seppel, of course, was voting Anak himself literally one post earlier (@772). Anak made a grand total of 1 post between these two posts. I already don't like Seppel because I think he's lying about something and even if he's not lying, he's not helping the town. This vote doesn't do anything to make me feel better about Seppel.
Fifth vote was Tordeck. Town.
Sixth vote was Iso. Scum.
Seventh Vote: DV @1049. Except, this wasn't the Seventh vote. This was the Fifth vote, and Iso and Tordeck piled on immediately after (Iso being 6 and Tordeck being 7).
Aside: Az, I am dissappoint with the accuracy of these vote counts. The order this stuff happens in actually matters man!
DV's vote was a vote that appeared to be trying to get something going, re: his "we nowhere near anything" comment. As such, I actually am much more okay with it.
Eighth Vote was Bur on himself. I want to say something snarky. I'll refrain.
Ninth Vote: Manders @1055. Immediately drops the hammer on Bur after his self vote. I'm agreeing with people who said this happened too fast, but I'm not convinced this was a super scummy vote. Manders had previously voted for Bur several times D1. Her opinion on him was well known. Arguably, the self-vote was Bur giving up as scum. It did bear a passing resemblance to the kind of self vote a scum might make on his way out - but only when he's dropping the actual hammer on himself. Not quite the same when he's putting himself at L-1. Anyway, this vote isn't the best, but it's not the worst either.
The worst looking (among the alive people) are GJ, Anak and Seppel.
It's only one datapoint. Doing the Iso lynch would be the second and probably more significant anyway, which I'd like to do. But that is definitely not happening tonight, and likely not tomorrow either.
Click that link, then look at gj's progression yesterday (seppel instead of this iso wagon>ok maybe both>oh yeah I am on this iso wagon yup)
Gj wagon is best wagon
So I was bussing Iso too? Checkmate.
Re: the Seppel thing: Idk about your detrimental truthfulness. In a vacuum, lying about it would make sense to me, but I don't know your style.
Draft my cube! (630 cards)
The only other thing that makes sense is you REALLY don't give a crap about this game or winning, which is also likely, but I'm willing to bet it is the former, not the latter.
That is not why I voted him. It was one symptom.
In my re-read (which I am continuing), I'm seeing a lot out of you of this ilk: where you subtly modify what others have said/done to fit your stance. This, alone, is NAI, but it should be noted.
Well, duh. We've never played together.
Why don't you ask Seppel about this? Why are you only asking me?
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
I'm not asking you, you informed me. My intial statement "I'm not sure why you're surprised that Seppel didn't take you at your word." was rhetorical, because of course you don't take someone you think is scum at their word.
Draft my cube! (630 cards)
Where did I say I was re-reading Cyan? I'm re-reading the whole game (and am on page 16 now) and was talking about you in the bolded portion.
You asked me why he should believe me. I told you why, but that wasn't good enough for you.
@ Seppel: I suppose the answer to my earlier question, why it is that you targeted me last night, is that you are not paying attention to who has claimed what. But, you know what's interesting? I'm the only one who claimed whether they did or not. I'll check again in my re-read, but I don't recall anyone else (and I'm far past where you claimed and no one else volunteered their information).
How can you justify this action? It is NOT too much to ask for you to remember one person who said that they didn't have one. I do not believe you didn't believe me for two reasons: 1) the reason I already gave Cythare. It would have made zero sense for me to lie about that when I volunteered the information ESPECIALLY since I don't lie, regardless of alignment, if I don't have to. and 2) You thought I was Town at the time I volunteered the information.
So, again...why would you target me?
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
I don't really have anything to say about what you said about me.
It's not that your answer isn't good enough - it's that I wasn't looking for an answer, for the reasons I've stated. It just seemed like a basic thing to not take someone you're scumreading at their word. I'm not sure why you're getting frustrated about this - it's not a personal slight.
Draft my cube! (630 cards)
/ shown empower?
So are you wanting to know why I changed my mind about Cyan being Scum? I'm so confused...
I didn't have any power last Night. Couldn't do anything.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Draft my cube! (630 cards)
Call it whatever you want, but this is fact and Cyan is now Town.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Gotta say, though...the GJ wagon's looking pretty solid. Though Anak totally still Scum.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Nothing new to say
Waiting on people
GJ scum
Still town
Nothing new to really to say
Manders self vote should be auto lynch. I don't think she tries that though as a wolf, especially after Bur did it and got lynched.
Does Wildfire actually have a shot today?
The GJ way path to no lynching:
No one has flipped with a passive ability.
No one has claimed a passive ability.
In fact we now know that bur, iso, tordeck, and chris had no passives.
DV and manders probably not
I have no passives.
Seems like wildfire doesnt.
Feel pretty good about cythare not having any.
So....
What would you do about you?
But what evs. I'll deal with that as a last resort. Otherwise I'm ignoring him.
But thanks for compiling the info that I should have been compiling since D1.
With any luck, there's only like 3 passives in the game and it's a lot easier for me to win than previously expected.
I'd ignore me too.
Axelrod
shadowlancerx
Anaklusmos
Gentleman Johnny
TheIceMan
Cyan
Once again I'm trading empowerment.
Anak, GJ, and Iso are at the top of my scum list currently. I'm re-reading the latter 2.
in all other situations, lol
It was too busy at work to do any re-reading, but my schedule for Saturday freed up for the most part, so yay. I should finish it this weekend.
Cyan and I have a very interesting relationship haha. The only way we can read each other is by analyzing our reactions to situations.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
The GJ way path to no lynching:
I doubt scumManders ever interacts with a scumIso in that manner. Yes, she buddies the brothers, but is typically more aggressive towards them.
tom still suspect
Deal with the liar first.
@Proph: In Bur's game, how did you balance playing with the town versus your own win condition?
The GJ way path to no lynching:
I still maintain MH is scum, but looks like I should go investigate GJ some more. Both cyan and MH concluding they are suddenly town is lol, no way they do that as scummates I don't think. Sticking with Cyan being genuine about it and MH going along because it relieves pressure. Her last paragraph above feels so fake, in particular
Everyone should review Anak's posts. He's constantly talking about how things "feel" rather than how they "are" as he just did. Classic scumtell, not wanting to commit TOO hard to anything.
And what paragraph, in particular, are you referring to? Where I say Cyan and I read each other's reactions? That's a ******* fact, proven time and time again seeing as how Cyan and I have played OODLES of games together.
Tired of corporate corruption ruining your favorite MtG site?
Come join ours!!
We even have Mafia!!
Also the statement, "analyzing our reactions to situations", is a nothing sentence. That doesn't mean anything, is why it feels so fake. What isn't analyzing reactions to situations?
The Rules:
If DV votes for Wildfire first, Wildfire will die.
If Wildfire votes DV first, DV will die.
Be quick, or be dead.
I've been kinda obsessively watching this thread.
Currently Playing:
Legacy: Something U/W Controlish
EDH Cube
Hypercube! A New EDH Deck Every Week(ish)!
Vote Wildfire
If only you chose me your ass would already be dead.
Unless DV flips actual scum here, which I do not think is going to happen, Wildfire probably needs instant death. That choice was so awful, especially under the circumstances, I simply cannot imagine it coming from Town.
That could be totally wrong, but feels right.
This was obvious the moment D3 started.
If you were town you'd know this already.
You're not acting at all how a townie would act in this situation.
Unvote
Vote Wildfire
Draft my cube! (630 cards)
This is not a surprise.
And, I'm pretty sure I've had DV trending towards the top of my list of Townies for a long time now, so I don't know what your on about that.