You get what I'm saying right? The town can't have any power roles but the mafia have like 2 already by everyone's standards. I've got about exactly a half an hour before I peace out now so I'll check the thread one last time.
Putting it in the thread for all to see is still infinitely better than telling one person who at least professes to expect death.
And Mr. Sloger did put Vaimes on his list of choices, though he tempered it with vague comments about his bizarre mancrush on Mr. Vaimes.
As for Mato, just because I would rather a corpse of you does not mean I trust him.
I was trying to avoid the Iso post, but "if you read the ******* game", you would have known who I thought was scum.
I don't actually mind repeating myself, but there are times where it's frusterating. Especially if I was being heavily considered to be the lynch, my posts should be being analyzed to the fullest.
Frankly, Jonathan, I could give two *****s about your claim. I am after your mindset.
As you have said, your claim being true has little bearing on your alignment.
Could of fooled me. Here I thought you were just trying to make sure the flavor fit
It's not about him having votes last night, it's about planning for the future. A couple great scenarios happen if he is on the jury. One, we catch a lying scum. Two, he gets to prove his claim. Three, nothing happens but we made scum have to kill outside the jury group. The last scenario sucks, but basically nothing happens and we have a huge load of WIFOM to sort through...
3 our of 4 possibilities that are decent seem like a solid plan to me...
I was not disagreeing with Ghosting being on the jury, just the statement that it was "what the people want".
But I think even Mr. Sloger would not object to it if it meant that the mafia could not kill Mr. Klusmos or Mr. Vaimes.
I was trying to avoid the Iso post, but "if you read the ******* game", you would have known who I thought was scum.
I don't actually mind repeating myself, but there are times where it's frusterating. Especially if I was being heavily considered to be the lynch, my posts should be being analyzed to the fullest.
I am quite certain they will be, one way or another. But I lack the time for that at the moment
Could of fooled me. Here I thought you were just trying to make sure the flavor fit
^That, would be mudslinging.
I actually quite agree with you here.
You may notice that I am completely ignoring my colleague's rampant flavor- and setup- gaming, as well as his incredibly stupid "fake newb" and "english accent" arguments.
I don't know if I am following you D_V. Why can't scum have some already unlocked PRs?
They can have only one unlocked.
Because two town claimed to have been role blocked.
Otherwise they do not have a jury roleblocker and someone is lying hence not as many power roles. But everyone accepted the role blocks, therefore accepting the role existing that means only one scum SC could have been elected.
I don't know if I am following you D_V. Why can't scum have some already unlocked PRs?
They can have only one unlocked.
Because two town claimed to have been role blocked.
Otherwise they do not have a jury roleblocker and someone is lying hence not as many power roles. But everyone accepted the role blocks, therefore accepting the role existing that means only one scum SC could have been elected.
I don't know if I am following you D_V. Why can't scum have some already unlocked PRs?
They can have only one unlocked.
Because two town claimed to have been role blocked.
Otherwise they do not have a jury roleblocker and someone is lying hence not as many power roles. But everyone accepted the role blocks, therefore accepting the role existing that means only one scum SC could have been elected.
Gotcha. I see now.
There is the possibility of a town RB too but because that works as a clear I think they would have come forward. IE if I was the Town Roleblocker and blocked Iso, I'd be like Dotarchon got blocked by the Scum roleblocker and is town.
I'm happy with a GJ lynch today. If you guys go for Mato ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Mato's post truly seemed to me as frustrated town at the beginning and I'm wary of him but I think GJ is the better lynch today and that we can get another day's worth of interaction from Mato before deciding. Also, GJ's choice of "interview" is a joke to me. Megs, skated through trial day 1 then got elected by non-town forces to jury day 2. And honestly, even if megs confirms we are just going to send him back to trial day three.
I'm happy with a GJ lynch today. If you guys go for Mato ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Mato's post truly seemed to me as frustrated town at the beginning
Did you not attack my colleague for a very similar statement about Huntzilla in the QT?
And then attack yours truly for the same thought about Mato's first post in the trial?
No. I am getting off track with Mr. _V.
Tomorrow.
@Meggido
I know you prefer to just ask your questions and do your thinking in private, but talk to me. You are the only one here whose opinion I both trust and respect.
I don't know if I am following you D_V. Why can't scum have some already unlocked PRs?
They can have only one unlocked.
Because two town claimed to have been role blocked.
Otherwise they do not have a jury roleblocker and someone is lying hence not as many power roles. But everyone accepted the role blocks, therefore accepting the role existing that means only one scum SC could have been elected.
Gotcha. I see now.
There is the possibility of a town RB too but because that works as a clear I think they would have come forward. IE if I was the Town Roleblocker and blocked Iso, I'd be like Dotarchon got blocked by the Scum roleblocker and is town.
I'm happy with a GJ lynch today. If you guys go for Mato ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Mato's post truly seemed to me as frustrated town at the beginning and I'm wary of him but I think GJ is the better lynch today and that we can get another day's worth of interaction from Mato before deciding. Also, GJ's choice of "interview" is a joke to me. Megs, skated through trial day 1 then got elected by non-town forces to jury day 2. And honestly, even if megs confirms we are just going to send him back to trial day three.
I thought about a jailkeeper if it was on a townie, simply because it fits into the whole "law and order/criminal justice system" theme of AA... But like I have said, this source material is lost on me. Also, I would think something as strong as a jailkeeper on a townie would need to be unlocked in order to be used.
Makes infinitely more sense that scum had a roleblocker that didn't need to be unlocked... Occam's and all
Unless it was unlocked, but that squarely points the finger at Sir Chris, and with the whole "neighborizer" thing going on with GJ, it only fits if GJ flips scum.
Chris is begging you to reconsider your vote DV. He knows he has been a dastardly guy, and lets anger guide his hand, but has a really strong accuracy for standing by people who are town. He realizes it is a tough sell, but he has information you do not.
As far as tomorrow is concerned. They literally needed my self vote to send me to trial, and I think you have been very pro-me, if my ability went off (at least, that's were you were yesterday. Do as you will though
Wait, I think you meant sending TCM back to trial. Maybe I'm wrong.
Anyway, maybe that happens. But I'm pretty sure we send Matowar back to trial Tomorrow too.
With that in mind, here's my proposition.
Lynch Matowar.
Elect the following "slots" to jury:
1. Chris
2. Vaimes / Huntzilla
3. [TBD]
Reasoning:
Chris I want on jury for a few reasons. First, after seeing him fired up Today I am confident that he will actually participate in the Jury chat in a meaningful way. Two, even if he is in the Jury he will be able to talk to us through TCM (note here that we are not lynching TCM partially for this reason).
The Vaimes/Huntzilla slot is a binary: If Mat is scum, elect Vaimes. If Mat is town, elect Hunt. Vaimes CC'd Matowar, so if we are correct on Mat then we are likely electing a strong PR to Jury this way (the reasoning before is speculative but I buy it: if Vaimes were a vig that didn't need to be on Jury to shoot, he would have just been silent and shot Mat rather than CC). If Mat is actually town, we elect obvtown Hunt who both has a relevant jury-activated ability.
The third slot is my flex slot. Thinking back to my D0, I want to throw somebody that we aren't sure of in the ring, with the understanding that our other two Jurors will put the pressure on this person and analyze critically their posts. I'm not sure who the best candidate for this slot would be, though Citric is my #1 candidate since I do not not have a read on him right now.
I know that we all want Anak for jury again. We could sub Anak in for Chris maybe?
What are your thoughts? Any other suggestions for the TBD slot?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Can we have Megiddo removed from the forum forever please?
i'm pretty sure i can find your ***** online within 3 minutes
@GJ
Chris shared his conclusions, but could not be bothered to really lay them out.
Figuring Chris out is the #1 bullet point on my personal to-do list as soon as this trial is over.
Chris I want on jury for a few reasons. First, after seeing him fired up Today I am confident that he will actually participate in the Jury chat in a meaningful way. Two, even if he is in the Jury he will be able to talk to us through TCM (note here that we are not lynching TCM partially for this reason).
This leads to Chris in the jury QT where no one can see him with Johnny in the main thread distracting everyone. If we lynch Mato, I am firmly opposed to that.
If they are both in the thread, Chris can actually defend Johnny as much as he wishes and we can all try to figure them both out from that.
But your main point was lynching Mato over GJ.
I do not need talked in to lynching Mato, but I do need talked out of GJ.
Do you think he is town?
Why should we keep him alive, other than "maybe he is town"?
Because I agree. Maybe he is.
By my estimation they have approximately equal likelihood of being scum.
But it seems to me that Johnny gives us more to build on regardless of flip.
Wait, I think you meant sending TCM back to trial. Maybe I'm wrong.
Anyway, maybe that happens. But I'm pretty sure we send Matowar back to trial Tomorrow too.
With that in mind, here's my proposition.
Lynch Matowar.
Elect the following "slots" to jury:
1. Chris
2. Vaimes / Huntzilla
3. [TBD]
Reasoning:
Chris I want on jury for a few reasons. First, after seeing him fired up Today I am confident that he will actually participate in the Jury chat in a meaningful way. Two, even if he is in the Jury he will be able to talk to us through TCM (note here that we are not lynching TCM partially for this reason).
The Vaimes/Huntzilla slot is a binary: If Mat is scum, elect Vaimes. If Mat is town, elect Hunt. Vaimes CC'd Matowar, so if we are correct on Mat then we are likely electing a strong PR to Jury this way (the reasoning before is speculative but I buy it: if Vaimes were a vig that didn't need to be on Jury to shoot, he would have just been silent and shot Mat rather than CC). If Mat is actually town, we elect obvtown Hunt who both has a relevant jury-activated ability.
The third slot is my flex slot. Thinking back to my D0, I want to throw somebody that we aren't sure of in the ring, with the understanding that our other two Jurors will put the pressure on this person and analyze critically their posts. I'm not sure who the best candidate for this slot would be, though Citric is my #1 candidate since I do not not have a read on him right now.
I know that we all want Anak for jury again. We could sub Anak in for Chris maybe?
What are your thoughts? Any other suggestions for the TBD slot?
I mean, hell yeah I'm on board. Anak would be preferred for the first slot to me.
The TBD spot could be Seppel or Citric. Those two are my "wildcards" right now.
Or Vaimes is scum, is lying and this is a terrible way to get GJ off the hook and SC and Vaimes onto Jury while mislynching and trying to seem town. You actually think someone has exactly the same role as me? And with that uncertainty you're happy to put him on the bloody jury along with SC who is a null tell at best with his terrible outburst and poor jury performance -.- We have no scum killed yet? Stop adding speculation and lynch someone who's flip brings us something! Maybe this plan will start to solve the game D4? This seems terrible but maybe I'm just wrong.
Ok Matowar. You are making it harder and harder to kill anyone who is not you.
Please speak more in depth about your thoughts on Vaimes.
Every question I am asking you is telling you to go deeper on your thoughts, or explain what you meant when you said ____.
You still have a couple of hours to do so.
"Stop your pathetic blabbing and testify like a man!"
Tell me why Johnny is scum.
Explain why Huntzilla as the only scum in a 7-player game is relevant to Vaimes in this game.
Talk about your read of CitricBase.
Give us your thoughts on Cyan.
@GJ
Chris shared his conclusions, but could not be bothered to really lay them out.
Figuring Chris out is the #1 bullet point on my personal to-do list as soon as this trial is over.
Chris I want on jury for a few reasons. First, after seeing him fired up Today I am confident that he will actually participate in the Jury chat in a meaningful way. Two, even if he is in the Jury he will be able to talk to us through TCM (note here that we are not lynching TCM partially for this reason).
This leads to Chris in the jury QT where no one can see him with Johnny in the main thread distracting everyone. If we lynch Mato, I am firmly opposed to that.
If they are both in the thread, Chris can actually defend Johnny as much as he wishes and we can all try to figure them both out from that.
But your main point was lynching Mato over GJ.
I do not need talked in to lynching Mato, but I do need talked out of GJ.
Do you think he is town?
Why should we keep him alive, other than "maybe he is town"?
Because I agree. Maybe he is.
By my estimation they have approximately equal likelihood of being scum.
But it seems to me that Johnny gives us more to build on regardless of flip.
Well, for one I think Mato is much more likely to be scum than TCM.
But, looking at it from the perspective where they are equally likely to be scum, I'd rather answer the vig question now. Vaimes has CC'd as a killing role. If we lynch Mato we can confirm this and get Vaimes online ASAP.
If we lynch TCM we still have this question in the open.
Would you take Anak over Chris to address your first point? This gives us Anak/(Vaimes/Hunt)/Citric(?) as a jury.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Can we have Megiddo removed from the forum forever please?
i'm pretty sure i can find your ***** online within 3 minutes
I feel like I've put a lot of questions out there.
Answer them or tell me what you want me to know.
It looks like it is my decision.
I can vote GJ with Mr. _V or let it default to Matowar (though I would most likely cast the vote in the final minute on principle)
Quote from tom »
lol. its like GJ's jury plan. If he doesnt finish his plan and convince people to follow it, it basically just defaults to mine.
awesome
There will be no more outbursts from you, Mr. Sloger.
We have 170 minutes to make the right choice
Again, I am discounting setup gaming. Mr. Sloger is bad at it and I have no opinion.
But all of those seem like perfectly acceptable jurors.
If we are going to put Huntzilla on for his claim, I would think Ghosting is a better option. Other than how strongly I think he is scum...
But I still do not see how choosing 3 jurors and telling people who to vote for is a good plan
i could be convinced to just name 3 jury candidates and let people choose among them.
that seems likely to get probably 2 of them on? and give us information claiming it Tomorrow.
Again, I am discounting setup gaming. Mr. Sloger is bad at it and I have no opinion.
But all of those seem like perfectly acceptable jurors.
If we are going to put Huntzilla on for his claim, I would think Ghosting is a better option. Other than how strongly I think he is scum...
But I still do not see how choosing 3 jurors and telling people who to vote for is a good plan
I still feel strongly that Ghosting and I should not be on together as it is just overkill.
I sound crazy, Vaimes reminds me of Hunt's play safe scum style. Citric's interaction with Vaimes plus his lack of input made me think him suspicious. I'm gonna get hung from trying to defend my terrible start at some point, knowing that why not try and use my newness as a shield in the hopes I might actually make a relavent input later on? I hoped we had started getting somewhere after my earlier post about Iso and the jury but we ended up arresting the same dull, town acting off people again, I don't really get why but I feel like we're getting pushed in the wrong direction repeatedly, We need a change and after trying to push us somewhere else we went full circle. My input means too little and everyone seems to be content with lynching their first scum in two days time. I don't think a big game was a good idea for my first one and I'm fairly sure that scum is too experienced for me to catchadI tried engaging and got stuck in the defendants pool, you should probably consider SC, Iso, Vaimes and GJ after I'm dead. And stop voting GJ into the bloody defendants pool. If you're not going to lynch him stop wasting the space. We could have actually had someone worth lynching here. I guess I'll try and analyse a wagon for the first time in a second.
Have you looked into Vaimes playstyle in other games where he was town Mato?
If you have time, could you compare and contrast his play here with a town game?
What you are seeing in his comparison to my scum game may just be Vaimes being himself.
I still feel strongly that Ghosting and I should not be on together as it is just overkill.
In case anyone wanted to know.
LOL
oh *****. me and megs regular relationship is leaking into the game. this is actually kind of what i meant by my now infamous "facebook friends"
but whatever.
i could get down with {anak, vaimes, citric}
remember you havent convinced my colleague to lynch matowar and set up that dependency.
Do you not see the value in solving this CC issue now rather than later? Like we're never electing Matowar to jury. TCM can actually prove his ability.
If TCM's ability goes off and it is exactly as he says, would you still want to lynch him Tomorrow?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Can we have Megiddo removed from the forum forever please?
i'm pretty sure i can find your ***** online within 3 minutes
Do you not see the value in solving this CC issue now rather than later? Like we're never electing Matowar to jury. TCM can actually prove his ability.
If TCM's ability goes off and it is exactly as he says, would you still want to lynch him Tomorrow?
maybe. if you recall, i was making the argument as scum. Jonathan's claim is a non-entity.
Telling the truth or not. Town role or scum. We do not know.
Having official confirmation that it exists is vaguely meaningful, but it only proves that either Johnny himself or someone on his team has it.
We could assign players to vote for jurors I guess (following your plan) though we'll see if it works. As long as people vote within the three selected (picking whomever they want) we should get the desired result.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Can we have Megiddo removed from the forum forever please?
i'm pretty sure i can find your ***** online within 3 minutes
Deciding who votes isn't hard. Split the list, and make sure no one is voting for themselves.
sigh. looks like im part of an actual plan whether i like it or not.
if youre going to keep touting this, put in the work.
>take out d_v, as he's openly said he wont follow it.
>make sure people are voting differently than in past days to make control groups.
if this is what we're doing, we can sure as **** do it better than dividing the playerlist in thirds.
In a game of league, but his behavior has been really weird. I keep feel like he is going from good analysis to newb. Even the last post he put back on: "Ill get on GJ's wagon now" Was he really still considering hunt at this stage?
And why wasn't he more "rah rah Vaimes"? It just reek,s of inconsistency
I think I do.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
I was trying to avoid the Iso post, but "if you read the ******* game", you would have known who I thought was scum.
I don't actually mind repeating myself, but there are times where it's frusterating. Especially if I was being heavily considered to be the lynch, my posts should be being analyzed to the fullest.
Could of fooled me. Here I thought you were just trying to make sure the flavor fit
^That, would be mudslinging.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
But I think even Mr. Sloger would not object to it if it meant that the mafia could not kill Mr. Klusmos or Mr. Vaimes.
I don't know if I am following you D_V. Why can't scum have some already unlocked PRs?
You may notice that I am completely ignoring my colleague's rampant flavor- and setup- gaming, as well as his incredibly stupid "fake newb" and "english accent" arguments.
They can have only one unlocked.
Because two town claimed to have been role blocked.
Otherwise they do not have a jury roleblocker and someone is lying hence not as many power roles. But everyone accepted the role blocks, therefore accepting the role existing that means only one scum SC could have been elected.
Gotcha. I see now.
There is the possibility of a town RB too but because that works as a clear I think they would have come forward. IE if I was the Town Roleblocker and blocked Iso, I'd be like Dotarchon got blocked by the Scum roleblocker and is town.
I'm happy with a GJ lynch today. If you guys go for Mato ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Mato's post truly seemed to me as frustrated town at the beginning and I'm wary of him but I think GJ is the better lynch today and that we can get another day's worth of interaction from Mato before deciding. Also, GJ's choice of "interview" is a joke to me. Megs, skated through trial day 1 then got elected by non-town forces to jury day 2. And honestly, even if megs confirms we are just going to send him back to trial day three.
And then attack yours truly for the same thought about Mato's first post in the trial?
No. I am getting off track with Mr. _V.
Tomorrow.
@Meggido
I know you prefer to just ask your questions and do your thinking in private, but talk to me. You are the only one here whose opinion I both trust and respect.
I thought about a jailkeeper if it was on a townie, simply because it fits into the whole "law and order/criminal justice system" theme of AA... But like I have said, this source material is lost on me. Also, I would think something as strong as a jailkeeper on a townie would need to be unlocked in order to be used.
Makes infinitely more sense that scum had a roleblocker that didn't need to be unlocked... Occam's and all
Unless it was unlocked, but that squarely points the finger at Sir Chris, and with the whole "neighborizer" thing going on with GJ, it only fits if GJ flips scum.
As far as tomorrow is concerned. They literally needed my self vote to send me to trial, and I think you have been very pro-me, if my ability went off (at least, that's were you were yesterday. Do as you will though
The GJ way path to no lynching:
It doesn't change my stance on Chris. I'm sorry tom, but if you are looking for my endorsement for SC after I flip town, you aren't going to get it.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
Anyway, maybe that happens. But I'm pretty sure we send Matowar back to trial Tomorrow too.
With that in mind, here's my proposition.
Lynch Matowar.
Elect the following "slots" to jury:
1. Chris
2. Vaimes / Huntzilla
3. [TBD]
Reasoning:
Chris I want on jury for a few reasons. First, after seeing him fired up Today I am confident that he will actually participate in the Jury chat in a meaningful way. Two, even if he is in the Jury he will be able to talk to us through TCM (note here that we are not lynching TCM partially for this reason).
The Vaimes/Huntzilla slot is a binary: If Mat is scum, elect Vaimes. If Mat is town, elect Hunt. Vaimes CC'd Matowar, so if we are correct on Mat then we are likely electing a strong PR to Jury this way (the reasoning before is speculative but I buy it: if Vaimes were a vig that didn't need to be on Jury to shoot, he would have just been silent and shot Mat rather than CC). If Mat is actually town, we elect obvtown Hunt who both has a relevant jury-activated ability.
The third slot is my flex slot. Thinking back to my D0, I want to throw somebody that we aren't sure of in the ring, with the understanding that our other two Jurors will put the pressure on this person and analyze critically their posts. I'm not sure who the best candidate for this slot would be, though Citric is my #1 candidate since I do not not have a read on him right now.
I know that we all want Anak for jury again. We could sub Anak in for Chris maybe?
What are your thoughts? Any other suggestions for the TBD slot?
I'll be leaving for the gym in a bit and will return somewhere like 2 hours later. After that I'll review anything new and cast my vote.
actually I guess I'll bring my phone, so I can check between sets.
Chris shared his conclusions, but could not be bothered to really lay them out.
Figuring Chris out is the #1 bullet point on my personal to-do list as soon as this trial is over.
Which brings me to:This leads to Chris in the jury QT where no one can see him with Johnny in the main thread distracting everyone. If we lynch Mato, I am firmly opposed to that.
If they are both in the thread, Chris can actually defend Johnny as much as he wishes and we can all try to figure them both out from that.
But your main point was lynching Mato over GJ.
I do not need talked in to lynching Mato, but I do need talked out of GJ.
Do you think he is town?
Why should we keep him alive, other than "maybe he is town"?
Because I agree. Maybe he is.
By my estimation they have approximately equal likelihood of being scum.
But it seems to me that Johnny gives us more to build on regardless of flip.
I mean, hell yeah I'm on board. Anak would be preferred for the first slot to me.
The TBD spot could be Seppel or Citric. Those two are my "wildcards" right now.
Please speak more in depth about your thoughts on Vaimes.
Every question I am asking you is telling you to go deeper on your thoughts, or explain what you meant when you said ____.
You still have a couple of hours to do so.
"Stop your pathetic blabbing and testify like a man!"
Tell me why Johnny is scum.
Explain why Huntzilla as the only scum in a 7-player game is relevant to Vaimes in this game.
Talk about your read of CitricBase.
Give us your thoughts on Cyan.
But, looking at it from the perspective where they are equally likely to be scum, I'd rather answer the vig question now. Vaimes has CC'd as a killing role. If we lynch Mato we can confirm this and get Vaimes online ASAP.
If we lynch TCM we still have this question in the open.
Would you take Anak over Chris to address your first point? This gives us Anak/(Vaimes/Hunt)/Citric(?) as a jury.
I feel like I've put a lot of questions out there.
Answer them or tell me what you want me to know.
It looks like it is my decision.
I can vote GJ with Mr. _V or let it default to Matowar (though I would most likely cast the vote in the final minute on principle)
There will be no more outbursts from you, Mr. Sloger.
We have 170 minutes to make the right choice
I want to settle the jury question before we vote.
Are there any real objections to my plan? Hunt has suggested Seppel over Citric but Tom as you say Seppel doesn't want it.
So that we can have a legitimate vote to end the Day.
But all of those seem like perfectly acceptable jurors.
If we are going to put Huntzilla on for his claim, I would think Ghosting is a better option. Other than how strongly I think he is scum...
But I still do not see how choosing 3 jurors and telling people who to vote for is a good plan
Apparently we are subject to jury shenanigans no matter what method we choose (case in point: me) so.
I think having some accountability is better than no accountability.
I still feel strongly that Ghosting and I should not be on together as it is just overkill.
In case anyone wanted to know.
{Anak, [Vaimes/Hunt]*, X}
Who would you select for X?
*Vaimes vs Hunt is determined by Matowar flip as described above
Have you looked into Vaimes playstyle in other games where he was town Mato?
If you have time, could you compare and contrast his play here with a town game?
What you are seeing in his comparison to my scum game may just be Vaimes being himself.
{ANAK, [VAIMES/HUNT], CITRIC} as our pool is pretty good IMO. Can I just ram this down everybody's throats as the jury plan? Yes?
If we get any two of those plus a "wildcard" who is town we are in good shape.
errolson pls
[1] Gentleman Johnny - D_V
[1] Matowar77 - Megiddo
Not Voting (1): tomsloger
Deadline is at 11:59 EST today (2 hours, 15 minutes). If the deadline expires then Matowar77 will be the lynch.
oh *****. me and megs regular relationship is leaking into the game. this is actually kind of what i meant by my now infamous "facebook friends"
but whatever.
i could get down with {anak, vaimes, citric}
remember you havent convinced my colleague to lynch matowar and set up that dependency.
Juror planning has nothing to do with determining guilt. This should have been done during investigation.
@Matowar
If you are town, how will you change your play for the next game to avoid this happening again?
Do you not see the value in solving this CC issue now rather than later? Like we're never electing Matowar to jury. TCM can actually prove his ability.
If TCM's ability goes off and it is exactly as he says, would you still want to lynch him Tomorrow?
Megs: As seppel was starting to get votes and questions, he immediately hammered me and started the trial phase. Do you really want him on the jury?
The GJ way path to no lynching:
Jonathan's claim is a non-entity.
Telling the truth or not. Town role or scum. We do not know.
Having official confirmation that it exists is vaguely meaningful, but it only proves that either Johnny himself or someone on his team has it.
I have no issue with your thing. I would do Hunt over Vaimes if you go with mat, and he flips town. The third slot I would do Anak.
How do you want people to vote for it? How do you know a majority of the others won't just all vote for the mystery slot?
The GJ way path to no lynching:
We could assign players to vote for jurors I guess (following your plan) though we'll see if it works. As long as people vote within the three selected (picking whomever they want) we should get the desired result.
You proposed Anak for Chris. I am merely stating I would rather have anak for the mystery slot.
Deciding who votes isn't hard. Split the list, and make sure no one is voting for themselves.
The GJ way path to no lynching:
Tom wanted Anak over Chris, so we're currently working with {ANAK, [VAIMES/HUNT], CITRIC}
You would prefer {ANAK, [VAIMES/HUNT], CHRIS} I take it?
My issue with this is that I want to have one question mark on the Jury, and that slate doesn't have any.
How would you assess Matowar's behavior in this trial?
if youre going to keep touting this, put in the work.
>take out d_v, as he's openly said he wont follow it.
>make sure people are voting differently than in past days to make control groups.
if this is what we're doing, we can sure as **** do it better than dividing the playerlist in thirds.
And why wasn't he more "rah rah Vaimes"? It just reek,s of inconsistency
The GJ way path to no lynching: