KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
IDK about that. If I can get the hidden part of my role to be useful tonight, we might not lose. It can't be blocked so. We will see how this works out though.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
IDK about that. If I can get the hidden part of my role to be useful tonight, we might not lose. It can't be blocked so. We will see how this works out though.
If you come in clutch in saving town in endgame, this time I won't hate you for it.
IDK about that. If I can get the hidden part of my role to be useful tonight, we might not lose. It can't be blocked so. We will see how this works out though.
If you come in clutch in saving town in endgame, this time I won't hate you for it.
Lol.
I'll reread over Night to make sure who teams actually are. I won't even rule you out until I read everyone. Just to be fair.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Men cannot grieve as dogs do. We should be grateful for that.
Tubba has been killed. He was Nighteyes - Mafia Hunter
You should leave off sniffing the carcass of your old life, my brother. You may enjoy unending pain. I do not. There is no shame from walking away from bones, Changer. Nor is there any special wisdom in injuring oneself over and over. What is your loyalty to that pain? To abandon it will not lessen you
You are Nighteyes the wolf. Fitz rescued you from an illegal animal dealer when you were a cub and the two of you formed a deep bond. You were pack and together you both grew to implicitly trust The Fool and Kettricken.
You start with 4 Vitality.
The Wit: 1-Shot Anytime Action - You bond with another player and are able to each send one 30-word message per phase to each other.
Vigilant Partner: Passive - Whenever a player targets one of your Wit partner(s), you learn which player did so and what ability they used.
You win when you achieve control of the vote.
Highroller has been killed. He was Verity - Town King-in-Waiting
But in my heart, when I said “my king,” I meant Verity.
You are Verity, the King-in-Waiting at Buckkeep. You are the son of King Shrewd and the sibling of Prince Chivalry and Prince Regal. With the realm in need, you embark upon a quest to find the mythical Elderlings to aid the Seven Kingdoms.
You start with 4 Vitality.
Verity’s Quest: Anytime Action - You become Verity-as-Dragon at the beginning of the next phase. After transforming you enter a slumber. When you enter the slumber, your vitality becomes 1. While in the slumber, you may only post once per 24 hours in the thread (excluding posts that include only a vote and no other content). Each phase while slumbering, you may create a free skill channel that lasts for 2 phases to any player (this ignores the restriction of only having 1 skill chat at a time).
While slumbering, any player you have a chat open with gains the strongman passive (your abilities cannot be blocked, redirected, or prevented) while the chat is open.
You win when all threats to the town are eliminated.
When you speak in riddles, it exasperates me. Yet when you try to speak clearly of yourself, it frightens me.
In the night in vengenance for their fallen allies the creeping forces of chaos killed Bur.
He was Nettle - Town Skill Master
Love isn't just about feeling sure of the other person, knowing what he would give up for you. It's knowing with certainty what you are willing to surrender for his sake. Make no mistake; each partner gives up something.
You are Nettle, daughter of Fitz and Molly, and Skillmaster for King-in-Waiting Dutiful. You have a vast natural talent for the Skill and a particular talent for entering people's dreams.
You start with 2 Vitality.
Dream Weaver: Passive - When a player opens a Skill channel to you, you are able to respond.
Natural Talent: Passive - Using the Skill costs 1V less. (For example, you may open a 1-phase chat for the cost of 0V.)
You win when all threats to the town are eliminated.
Vaimes and Killjoy have been endgamed by Sloth and BoomFrog. Mafia has won!
Role PM's and host thoughts to come shortly.
I chose to end the game immediately because the scum team locked in the shot on Bur. I couldn't end the game before the night because Vaimes and Killjoy had enough vitality to survive the nightkill (which dealt 5 vitality damage).
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
I don’t know if that world makes sense.
Sorry KJ.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Non-Staff Quasi-Mod-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Non-Staff Quasi-Mod-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Non-Staff Quasi-ModI'll reread over Night to make sure who teams actually are. I won't even rule you out until I read everyone. Just to be fair.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Non-Staff Quasi-ModThough I said this exact thing about Az and as we saw, my reads aren't that good
Sloth, maybe.
However, when all roads lead to death, there is no point in running down any of them.
Tubba (4): HR, Boom, Vaimes, KJ
HR (4): Tubba, Bur, Sloth, KJ
That is majority. HR and Tubba have been condemned. Scene incoming.
Please stop posting.
Leaving this for tomorrow assuming I don't die.
Thank you.
Tubba has been killed. He was Nighteyes - Mafia Hunter
You are Nighteyes the wolf. Fitz rescued you from an illegal animal dealer when you were a cub and the two of you formed a deep bond. You were pack and together you both grew to implicitly trust The Fool and Kettricken.
You start with 4 Vitality.
The Wit: 1-Shot Anytime Action - You bond with another player and are able to each send one 30-word message per phase to each other.
Vigilant Partner: Passive - Whenever a player targets one of your Wit partner(s), you learn which player did so and what ability they used.
You win when you achieve control of the vote.
Highroller has been killed. He was Verity - Town King-in-Waiting
You are Verity, the King-in-Waiting at Buckkeep. You are the son of King Shrewd and the sibling of Prince Chivalry and Prince Regal. With the realm in need, you embark upon a quest to find the mythical Elderlings to aid the Seven Kingdoms.
You start with 4 Vitality.
Verity’s Quest: Anytime Action - You become Verity-as-Dragon at the beginning of the next phase. After transforming you enter a slumber. When you enter the slumber, your vitality becomes 1. While in the slumber, you may only post once per 24 hours in the thread (excluding posts that include only a vote and no other content). Each phase while slumbering, you may create a free skill channel that lasts for 2 phases to any player (this ignores the restriction of only having 1 skill chat at a time).
While slumbering, any player you have a chat open with gains the strongman passive (your abilities cannot be blocked, redirected, or prevented) while the chat is open.
You win when all threats to the town are eliminated.
It is now Night 5. Night 5 will end in 24 hours.
In the night in vengenance for their fallen allies the creeping forces of chaos killed Bur.
He was Nettle - Town Skill Master
Love isn't just about feeling sure of the other person, knowing what he would give up for you. It's knowing with certainty what you are willing to surrender for his sake. Make no mistake; each partner gives up something.
You are Nettle, daughter of Fitz and Molly, and Skillmaster for King-in-Waiting Dutiful. You have a vast natural talent for the Skill and a particular talent for entering people's dreams.
You start with 2 Vitality.
Dream Weaver: Passive - When a player opens a Skill channel to you, you are able to respond.
Natural Talent: Passive - Using the Skill costs 1V less. (For example, you may open a 1-phase chat for the cost of 0V.)
You win when all threats to the town are eliminated.
Vaimes and Killjoy have been endgamed by Sloth and BoomFrog. Mafia has won!
Role PM's and host thoughts to come shortly.
I chose to end the game immediately because the scum team locked in the shot on Bur. I couldn't end the game before the night because Vaimes and Killjoy had enough vitality to survive the nightkill (which dealt 5 vitality damage).
Discord link
It sucks that we lost but I called Boom's role for scum so I'm a little satisfied there.
I'm a little sad that trying to draw the NK failed.
Anyways, oof. This scum win felt pretty inevitable, gg.
@boomfrog I'm officially over it. But.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Non-Staff Quasi-Mod"Final bet for scum:
Bessie/Tubba/Boom/Sloth"
gg buddy
that's about all im giving out
Sorry town, but Idk if I can really say you played your best
also told you highroller was town
but ya nobody read the room
- me/GJ failing to kill Tubba
- Azrael/Anak mess
- double yeet in lylo
Fun times.
fun times
Actually before that point, I was going to shoot you.