If you want to say you don't believe it or whatever that's cool though
Thats hyperbole. It's not horrifically bad. It either is hard to kill if he lives a while or he protects a buddy until he dies. Affter two deaths, both him and his target are hard to kill save lynches.
Okay and if he gets hit by the vit thief before another wolf dies he just dies instantly
By the time he's hard to kill his entire team has already been massacred and the main way wolves die is being exiled, making them "hard to kill otherwise" is almost pointless
You're basically saying "bulletproof that can pass his vest is too strong for a villager but sounds right for a wolf in a game with no apparent town vig"
Az (7): Bur, sloth, HR, Wisp, Silver, Bessie, Tubba,
Tubba (6): Az, GJ2, Anak, Vaimes, BoomFrog, KJ,
BoomFrog (2): Cuth, GJ1,
Anak (1): Tammy,
Not Voting (3): Cantrip,
With 16 alive it takes 9 to condemn.
--
At this point if 2 move off Tubba and onto Az we have yeet.
If 3 move off Az and onto Tubba, we also have yeet (I will be one of those 3 if it looks like there's no other way)
@tammy you're cutting it close. Why haven't you changed?
Alright, things are super unpredictable and dynamic right now due to last minute deadline crunch, so going to partial claim. My rolename is Fitzchivalry (the protagonist of the whole series) my ability is pretty darn protown and remains provable at the moment, and with being given an extra point last night, I'm able to use it if we hit night, and might report results back if I survive and aren't tampered with.
I'm witted, and I'm quite certain that I'm on LW's hit list.
I don't know that pulling the trigger on Tubba truly excites me, but this is a super dumb predicament.
Alright, things are super unpredictable and dynamic right now due to last minute deadline crunch, so going to partial claim. My rolename is Fitzchivalry (the protagonist of the whole series) my ability is pretty darn protown and remains provable at the moment, and with being given an extra point last night, I'm able to use it if we hit night, and might report results back if I survive and aren't tampered with.
I'm witted, and I'm quite certain that I'm on LW's hit list.
I don't know that pulling the trigger on Tubba truly excites me, but this is a super dumb predicament.
How bad of a hottake is "Cuth is a/the second neutral"? That, or Boomfrog is lying. There is 0 chance that Cuth is a villager who needs to kill the town protective.
Every second that Tubba doesn't self-pres is a second I'm more comfortable killing him.
Why is not self prezzing scummy?
Why wouldn't you self-press as town?
You 100% know your role. You might be 99% certain of the others', but never as certain as yours. If you're town your job is to survive.
More often than not, players refusing to self-pres are scum trying to wine people into thinking they're town for not doing so. (notable exception being KJ that one game).
Not self pressing isn't wolfy, but in a world where you are town, outside mod info, you know one thing, your alignment, and that's it, there should be abosolutely not reason why you let yourself die, ever
(Maybe there are some worlds tbf)
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
If you want to say you don't believe it or whatever that's cool though
Thats hyperbole. It's not horrifically bad. It either is hard to kill if he lives a while or he protects a buddy until he dies. Affter two deaths, both him and his target are hard to kill save lynches.
Okay and if he gets hit by the vit thief before another wolf dies he just dies instantly
By the time he's hard to kill his entire team has already been massacred and the main way wolves die is being exiled, making them "hard to kill otherwise" is almost pointless
You're basically saying "bulletproof that can pass his vest is too strong for a villager but sounds right for a wolf in a game with no apparent town vig"
You're assuming his vit count is accurate. I'm assuming ir might not be.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
How bad of a hottake is "Cuth is a/the second neutral"? That, or Boomfrog is lying. There is 0 chance that Cuth is a villager who needs to kill the town protective.
I am currently recalibrating because if I'm supposed to assume boom's claim is true then, well
Apparently people are getting powered up from killing the opposite alignment
Then question here is, "Is boom really that wolfy to not believe that claim right now"? And the answer is no, and no amount of vit can save you from a yeet anyways
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
Not self pressing isn't wolfy, but in a world where you are town, outside mod info, you know one thing, your alignment, and that's it, there should be abosolutely not reason why you let yourself die, ever
(Maybe there are some worlds tbf)
Remember our first game (Oasis Mafia) together where I was town and offered to tank the yeet for someone else, and because of that town won? But that's okay, keep playing 2D chess.
Cuth claims he gets something positive for killing Boom, and Boom claimed a protective role. It's pretty bastard-y for a villager to gain something from killing another villager.
Not self pressing isn't wolfy, but in a world where you are town, outside mod info, you know one thing, your alignment, and that's it, there should be abosolutely not reason why you let yourself die, ever
(Maybe there are some worlds tbf)
Remember our first game (Oasis Mafia) together where I was town and offered to tank the yeet for someone else, and because of that town won? But that's okay, keep playing 2D chess.
How bad of a hottake is "Cuth is a/the second neutral"? That, or Boomfrog is lying. There is 0 chance that Cuth is a villager who needs to kill the town protective.
Since I might be about to die, I'm 99.9 percent sure that Cuth is Regal, the main villain of the first trilogy, and chivalry's brother who murdered him to become heir to the throne, and who also wants to murder my character.
Whether or not we read into that flavor may depend on subsequent flips.
Cuth claims he gets something positive for killing Boom, and Boom claimed a protective role. It's pretty bastard-y for a villager to gain something from killing another villager.
Yeah I agree, that makes no sense for both to be town.
MAybe Cuth is neutral then if Boom is town? If Cuth is town then Booom probably isnt
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
And there is every chance that the mafia have been "forged" (their minds destroyed and turned against their friends), such that most any claim might not truly be safe. Flips will tell us more about who the villains are, and what the logic behind their selection might be, if any.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
By the time he's hard to kill his entire team has already been massacred and the main way wolves die is being exiled, making them "hard to kill otherwise" is almost pointless
You're basically saying "bulletproof that can pass his vest is too strong for a villager but sounds right for a wolf in a game with no apparent town vig"
Az (7): Bur, sloth, HR, Wisp, Silver, Bessie, Tubba,
Tubba (6): Az, GJ2, Anak, Vaimes, BoomFrog, KJ,
BoomFrog (2): Cuth, GJ1,
Anak (1): Tammy,
Not Voting (3): Cantrip,
With 16 alive it takes 9 to condemn.
--
At this point if 2 move off Tubba and onto Az we have yeet.
If 3 move off Az and onto Tubba, we also have yeet (I will be one of those 3 if it looks like there's no other way)
@tammy you're cutting it close. Why haven't you changed?
It could really be either. Would love to hear from Cuth still.
I think you’re ire my childhood friend.
You 100% know your role. You might be 99% certain of the others', but never as certain as yours. If you're town your job is to survive.
More often than not, players refusing to self-pres are scum trying to wine people into thinking they're town for not doing so. (notable exception being KJ that one game).
(Maybe there are some worlds tbf)
And like he said, people weren't really finna yeet that
Apparently people are getting powered up from killing the opposite alignment
Makes the game pretty snowbally but ehh?
...I thought you had a list of names?
*Sigh*
Plus, any time I share my name, you could easily research that. Not hard to figure out.
But congrats I guess.
Anyway, that's moot now, Tubba voted.
vote: Tubba
There is also absolutely no difference between what Tubba is doing now, and his policy thoughts on self voting before
Tubba (7): Az, GJ, Anak, Vaimes, KJ, BoomFrog, Wisp
Az (6): Bur, HR, Sloth, Silver, Bessie, Tubba
BoomFrog (2): Cuth, GJ
Anak (1): Tammy
Not Voting (1): Cantrip
With 16 alive it takes 9 to condemn.
I have double checked the vote count but if you believe there are any errors please send me a PM.
Due to the mod sleeping in I am providing a 1 hour deadline extension.
Deadline for Day 2 is on Tuesday the 29th at 9am AEDT (this is at 5PM monday the 28th EST). This means the deadline is in just over 1 hour.
Apologies for the sloppy modding, I promise it will be better now that Christmas is over.
Since I might be about to die, I'm 99.9 percent sure that Cuth is Regal, the main villain of the first trilogy, and chivalry's brother who murdered him to become heir to the throne, and who also wants to murder my character.
Whether or not we read into that flavor may depend on subsequent flips.
Lol, wow. Alright.
@Tubba Claim.
MAybe Cuth is neutral then if Boom is town? If Cuth is town then Booom probably isnt
VOTE TUBBA
Unofficial Vote Count as of #2084
Tubba (8): Az, GJ2, Anak, Vaimes, BoomFrog, KJ, Wisp, sloth,
Az (5): Bur, HR, Silver, Bessie, Tubba,
BoomFrog (2): Cuth, GJ1,
Anak (1): Tammy,
Not Voting (3): Cantrip,
With 16 alive it takes 9 to condemn.
we still need one more.
If any players change to Az, which I still believe is the right call here, we can still make it happen.
No I’m a dumb dumb.
Stop pestering me. I literally responded to you and told you what I was thinking
We have an hour now.
Unvote
Tubba, start posting.
And there is every chance that the mafia have been "forged" (their minds destroyed and turned against their friends), such that most any claim might not truly be safe. Flips will tell us more about who the villains are, and what the logic behind their selection might be, if any.
Carry on.
Disagree with extension on principle (we had over 2 ******* weeks), but an hour is not too much.
unvote
@Tubba ball's on your court.