I don't even understand what your saying here. Is RVS over? And these are the "lowest" posters so far?
He’s talkin’ that nonsense, that’s why!
I’m fixin’ to get my boomstick and put a hole in PoppinLaxatives and Stinky-Toe Jerry. When their names come up all red, y’all can thank me with a case of Ol’ Milwaukee’s Best.
I mean, SBPCBWWE is kind of a thing but if all you're saying is that the bottom half of the player list probably has half of the wolves... that's like, the same accuracy as rand
I could use random.org to make a list of half the players and have the same number of wolves on average, yeah?
SBPCBWWE = Sort By Post Count, Become Werewolf Expert, or the idea that wolves are most likely to be lurking/low posting
Yeah, that's why I said "it's most likely simple probability" at the end there. Not meant to be anything substantial; it was just mostly for my own personal amusement
And admittedly I haven't played a whole lot of games this year but after playing Seasons (where I literally replaced into a slot that hadn't posted for the entirety of Day 1) and a off-site game where most of the wolves lurked D1, I am subscribing more to the "sort by post count" method as a general heuristic.
I mean, SBPCBWWE is kind of a thing but if all you're saying is that the bottom half of the player list probably has half of the wolves... that's like, the same accuracy as rand
I could use random.org to make a list of half the players and have the same number of wolves on average, yeah?
SBPCBWWE = Sort By Post Count, Become Werewolf Expert, or the idea that wolves are most likely to be lurking/low posting
Just a fun thought experiment that was somewhat successful last game I did it in (even though we lost).
After RVS has ended, post the bottom half of posters postcount wise and check back and see how many of them are scum at the end.
And yeah, I think Silver's vote on ZDS ended RVS.
Well, you won't find anyone more prone to believing lurking = scummy than me, but this is like, way too early to even remotely be considering that.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Bateleur »
Ambush Krotiq makes me laugh so much. I keep rereading the card and it keeps not having Flash. In what sense is this an ambush again? I just have visions of this huge Krotiq poorly concealed in some bushes, feeling slightly sad that his carefully planned ambushes never seem to work.
I agree it's too early - my post was blind conjecture. Again, just something for me to look back on post-game and laugh at, rather than anything substantial.
I do have some more informed thoughts on the gamestate but I'll give this thread some time to breathe.
Proph was aware that I'm in australia at some point. So lumping me with low posters for posting twice before going to bed sure is a thing. Probably a meaningless thing but sure is a thing. Active lurking definitely is the thing. Proph never was great at just floating.
Vote: DK
If we're going to do bad mafia tells we should definitely use the third person on an pseudoRVS wagon tell.
@Vaimes Hi, glad you think my RVS is that bad! You should know it isn't my RVS that's bad at scum, it's my late day one that's a train wreck as scum.
Anyway it's way too early to talk about activity reads (It's always too early for activity reads tbh).
Anyway it's probably rust but DK and his elected affect is rubbing me the wrong way. He has always seems a very in control and comfortable in his position. Even acknowledging it's RVS he feels more forceful here than normal. Which isn't a scum tell but it's a thing that needs an explanation or proof of good intentions. Really this is all note taking.
Just gonna call this the "Proph's Popping Bottles Theory" - just gonna take stock of the lowest posters after RVS and see how many of them are scum postgame.
1) Why does being unfamiliar with the flavor with regards to your post merit a finger of suspicion?
2) Why not put a vote on me anyways? If your vote isn't on anybody at the moment, having your vote on me would give us a better history of where your suspicions lie, as opposed to not voting.
3) What are your thoughts on the initial early ZDS pressure started by Silver and Rodemy?
Anyway it's way too early to talk about activity reads (It's always too early for activity reads tbh).
Anyway it's probably rust but DK and his elected affect is rubbing me the wrong way. He has always seems a very in control and comfortable in his position. Even acknowledging it's RVS he feels more forceful here than normal. Which isn't a scum tell but it's a thing that needs an explanation or proof of good intentions. Really this is all note taking.
Couple questions:
1) What do you mean by "elected affect"?
2) Are you sure that him seeming "in control and comfortable in his position" isn't just his self-imposed post restriction talking? And how is he acknowledging it's RVS in this post?
When I look at dkings, I see someone who is very much enjoying his posting restriction and having fun with it, not someone who is "in control and comfortable with his position". Can you point out specific posts that make you feel this way?
Yeah, nevermind, I'm going to [b]vote Prophylaxis[/b] . I told myself before the game started that I would vote for the first blatantly tryhard post trying to get a town lynched based on logic that made no sense whatsoever, and Prophylaxis' post was one of the biggest examples of this I've ever seen. Gonna stick with my guns.
Also, seriously? You make one of the most tryhard posts of all time, someone votes you for it, and you're not even going to address it?
3) What are your thoughts on the initial early ZDS pressure started by Silver and Rodemy?
A. ZDS strikes me as suspicious as well.
B. [i]It's page one of day one.[/i] Do you expect to get meaningful bandwagon analysis from this?
Do you live in like another time zone, or something? We're like 19 hours into the game. Why are you talking about bandwagon analysis and lynching lurkers when we're not even on page 3 of day one?
Care to comment on this?
[*]If you get redirected, you will be told you are redirected but not to whom unless your ability would give information about that player.
[*]Day phases last 10 days and Night phases last 48 hours. Deadline for sending in night actions is 47 hours. I might shorten the phase lengths when the game progresses.[/list][/quote]
List tags are malformed.
Lmao I didn't think that "Bird" was actually a claim. My apologies. (I thought that everyone would either be one of the seven dwarves or another named character, not just a random generic bird)
Quote from Highroller »
B. It's page one of day one. Do you expect to get meaningful bandwagon analysis from this?
Yes?
Maybe not actual bandwagon analysis per se, but other people's reactions or lack thereof can be telling. The game starts when the game starts.
Tell me exactly why you find ZDS suspicious? Is it mainly for him glossing over the fact that mafia have fake claims?
Quote from Highroller »
Do you live in like another time zone, or something? We're like 19 hours into the game. Why are you talking about bandwagon analysis and lynching lurkers when we're not even on page 3 of day one?
I do admit that my last game had 72 hour day phases
Not sure if you read my previous posts but my popping bottles theory was more of a thought experiment/thing for me to look back on and laugh rather than me accusing the six lowest posters of lurking, which is what I feel like you're suggesting.
Quote from Highroller »
Also, seriously? You make one of the most tryhard posts of all time, someone votes you for it, and you're not even going to address it?
Don't really feel the need to address it now; want to see how the game grows before engaging with him about it. Pretty much welcome pressure/talk about me right now as a way to jump start this game and to nail people's progressions on me later.
Yeah, nevermind, I'm going to vote Prophylaxis . I told myself before the game started that I would vote for the first blatantly tryhard post trying to get a town lynched based on logic that made no sense whatsoever, and Prophylaxis' post was one of the biggest examples of this I've ever seen. Gonna stick with my guns.
None of this was needed. It's just scum tossing out word confetti.
Side note: Highroller's formatting works for me but no thim because I'm a villager. QED.
I told myself before the game started that I would vote for the first blatantly tryhard post trying to get a town lynched based on logic that made no sense whatsoever, and Prophylaxis' post was one of the biggest examples of this I've ever seen. Gonna stick with my guns.
@Proph until proven otherwise I assume all gimmicks are chosen and not actual posting restrictions. I could very well be wrong but I start from the position of a choice.
And given that I'm assuming that DK is choosing to post that way and isn't acting out a role restriction I think my read of it follows. Obviously it's different if it is in fact a restriction.
Lmao I didn't think that "Bird" was actually a claim. My apologies. (I thought that everyone would either be one of the seven dwarves or another named character, not just a random generic bird)
Which makes it evident that you are not a random generic, and since I am one, I think that merits FOS.. It's not that hard.
Yes?
Maybe not actual bandwagon analysis per se, but other people's reactions or lack thereof can be telling. The game starts when the game starts.
Well that's bullcrap.
First of all, every game on this site has a period of nonsense voting at the start, especially on page one of day one.
Second, the game started in the evening on a Tuesday and it's not even been 24 hours. Calling out low posters is fundamentally ridiculous.
Tell me exactly why you find ZDS suspicious? Is it mainly for him glossing over the fact that mafia have fake claims?
That and his behavior rubs me as off.
I do admit that my last game had 72 hour day phases
Have you played no other games on this site?
Not sure if you read my previous posts but my popping bottles theory was more of a thought experiment/thing for me to look back on and laugh rather than me accusing the six lowest posters of lurking, which is what I feel like you're suggesting.
So, you're now admitting it's fundamentally ridiculous, but when I point out it's fundamentally ridiculous, that's wrong?
I thought your vote was tryhard in all the wrong ways.[/quote]Says the guy who votes me with no rationale, and later, when pressed, says, "There's too many words?"
His posting restriction isn't real, but I am curious to as to why you're factoring him choosing to adopt it as a tell when he literally said this before the game started:
Someone fill in the blank for me. I'm willing to pardon Grape for now but could easily see myself squishing him.
Axelrod/Highroller/CropCircles
I'm assuming you were making a list of the coolest people here, yes?
Initial thoughts: I think nothing of the supposed claims and posting restrictions, or whatever is going on there. I don't think anything can be gleaned from that. I think the early pile on ZDS was a bit unwarranted, and subsequently a bit sus. I'm also not a fan of of Prophylaxis calling attention to low posters so early. Seems like planting seeds early to justify votes later.
I figured Rodemy was hinting at being the Hunter, who is arguably a bad guy. Even if I don't trust flavour this game (and regardless of the mafia having fakeclaims), it still is gutsy to hint at arguably being a bad guy (flavour-wise).
For the record my Grapefruit vote was serious, but I also didn't put much faith into it.
I'll wait to let ZDS respond to Silver ending RVS, but as someone who is unfamiliar with the flavor of this game (read the story as a child and forgot about it), Rodemy's two posts read as far gutsier than Highroller's.
Rod, ZDS, Silver, and Proph are all town. Grape is scum getting an early we're-totally-scumbuddies interaction with Proph. Axel hemming and hawing over a supposed townslip is an act. The third wolf hasn't posted yet.
Bookmark this post.
Bookmarking this post because it makes Vaimes a wolf
The third wolf is Proph for postgame cred
Can you expand on Vaimes? Also why is Proph wolf "for postgame cred", as if you don't expect to ever actually pursue him?
See above. Why did you flavourclaim first thing if you are that aware of scum having fakeclaims?
---
1. silvercrys3467: Meh for having awful takes.
3. Rodemy: Town.
4. Prophylaxis: Low-hanging fruit? With a big question mark.
6. Vaimes: Town so let's get the most out of him before he gets bored and stops caring.
11. Highroller: Too many inconsistencies in his mindset, like Vaimes pointed out.
The rest:
I figured Rodemy was hinting at being the Hunter, who is arguably a bad guy. Even if I don't trust flavour this game (and regardless of the mafia having fakeclaims), it still is gutsy to hint at arguably being a bad guy (flavour-wise).
... You don't trust flavor this game, and you (allegedly) read the OP which said that the mafia has fake flavor claims, but Rodemy is still gutsy?
No, dude, none of that makes any sense at all.
Why did you flavourclaim first thing if you are that aware of scum having fakeclaims?
1. I always flavor claim first thing.
2. I'm BIRD. As in THIS GUY. Clearly I am the best role on the planet.
His posting restriction isn't real, but I am curious to as to why you're factoring him choosing to adopt it as a tell when he literally said this before the game started:
Look at this guy actually reading the sign up thread/remembering it at all. Well that probably does change things.
As for which posts it was just the sort of action taking you quoted as "having fun with his restriction".
My hot take is that this is highroller as town. Feels exactly like the guy I've tunneled so many times.
Rod, ZDS, Silver, and Proph are all town. Grape is scum getting an early we're-totally-scumbuddies interaction with Proph. Axel hemming and hawing over a supposed townslip is an act. The third wolf hasn't posted yet.
Bookmark this post.
Bookmarking this post because it makes Vaimes a wolf
The third wolf is Proph for postgame cred
Can you expand on Vaimes? Also why is Proph wolf "for postgame cred", as if you don't expect to ever actually pursue him?
They're both defending you. *chuckles*
I don't really believe the team is you/Vaimes/Proph that would be pretty silly
I agree with Vaimes points on him in regards to how he is treating Cross just feels so off to me. Rod's gimmick thing he has going on here is weird and a tad annoying, but I don't think he would be this gutsy as people call it if scum. Vaimes is my top town atm.
I agree it's too early - my post was blind conjecture. Again, just something for me to look back on post-game and laugh at, rather than anything substantial.
I do have some more informed thoughts on the gamestate but I'll give this thread some time to breathe.
This is something I expect from Wisp in the eod1 not from you at the very start. I agree that low posters tend to be scum in most cases, but I did not think of you the type to scum hunt that way normally you towncore up and work backwards.
I agree with Vaimes points on him in regards to how he is treating Cross just feels so off to me. Rod's gimmick thing he has going on here is weird and a tad annoying, but I don't think he would be this gutsy as people call it if scum. Vaimes is my top town atm.
YOUR CALLING OF NAMES HAS ME MIFFED
AT LEAST I’M NOT POSTING ONLY GIFS
I’LL SEE YOU AT DAWN, I CHALLENGE YOUR NAME
what... no death battles? THATS LAME
IM UNSURE ON YOUR VOTE AND REASON
IS THIS A VOTE FROM SCUM THIS SEASON?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Thank you for choosing
Rodemy Pizza
It’s not the best choice, but it’s a choice nonetheless
Rod's claim (that I saw) is gutsy despite scum having falseclaims because scum have no reason to claim an arguably bad character. In fact it is especially gutsy of him since scum have falseclaims and no reason whatsoever to claim someone bad. It's a pointlessly risky play if he's scum. (Of course all of this is moot if he wasn't trying to claim Hunter.)
On the other hands, Highroller's claim or my own vague hints take zero guts. We have completely safe characters that raise no eyebrow.
Speaking of Highroller, Grape's meta read has convinced me to leave him be for the time being. Unvote
I did a quick re-read of Silver (scumspect #2 at the time) to see if he's worth a vote, but based on #20 it seems his scumreads on me and Vaimes (@Grapefruit) are rooted in us having opposing views in what counts as "gutsy". That's not scummy.
I'm not going to say anything on Jack or Proph because I don't have anything useful to say, but I'm observing.
Initial thoughts: I think nothing of the supposed claims and posting restrictions, or whatever is going on there. I don't think anything can be gleaned from that. I think the early pile on ZDS was a bit unwarranted, and subsequently a bit sus. I'm also not a fan of of Prophylaxis calling attention to low posters so early. Seems like planting seeds early to justify votes later.
That's all I got for now.
These are vague and safe non-stances ("the early pile on ZDS was a bit unwarranted", "not a fan of Prophylaxis calling attention to low posters so early"), which he turns into potential votes later on ("subsequently a bit sus", "planting seeds early to justify votes later").
And no the irony of accusing him of doing what he's accusing Proph of doing is not lost on me. But there's my second issue with this post: whereas Proph is experimenting by looking for lurkers too early and is ******* up as a result, CC hides carefully in a dark corner and seems to mostly focus on not ******* up. To bring back the digestive track, Proph had guts, CC has none.
It may only be a single post but it's far more worth pursuing than any of the current wagons IMO.
After RVS has ended, post the bottom half of posters postcount wise and check back and see how many of them are scum at the end.
And yeah, I think Silver's vote on ZDS ended RVS.
He’s talkin’ that nonsense, that’s why!
I’m fixin’ to get my boomstick and put a hole in PoppinLaxatives and Stinky-Toe Jerry. When their names come up all red, y’all can thank me with a case of Ol’ Milwaukee’s Best.
I could use random.org to make a list of half the players and have the same number of wolves on average, yeah?
And admittedly I haven't played a whole lot of games this year but after playing Seasons (where I literally replaced into a slot that hadn't posted for the entirety of Day 1) and a off-site game where most of the wolves lurked D1, I am subscribing more to the "sort by post count" method as a general heuristic.
http://m.theofficequotes.com/?url=http://www.theofficequotes.com/season-3/product-recall/quote_1310&utm_referrer=#2905
I do have some more informed thoughts on the gamestate but I'll give this thread some time to breathe.
Vote: DK
If we're going to do bad mafia tells we should definitely use the third person on an pseudoRVS wagon tell.
@Vaimes Hi, glad you think my RVS is that bad! You should know it isn't my RVS that's bad at scum, it's my late day one that's a train wreck as scum.
Does active lurking make you want to wolf read Proph?
Anyway it's probably rust but DK and his elected affect is rubbing me the wrong way. He has always seems a very in control and comfortable in his position. Even acknowledging it's RVS he feels more forceful here than normal. Which isn't a scum tell but it's a thing that needs an explanation or proof of good intentions. Really this is all note taking.
1. The entire playgroup is actin' a fool if you think that anyone, even Thor, could contend with the might of Bird!
2. Well that merits a finger of suspicion.
3. Dude, it's not even been 24 hours since the game started. Are you freaking joking?
The only thing keeping me from voting you right now is that there's a voice in my head telling me, "Hang on, no mafia would be this obvious."
1) Why does being unfamiliar with the flavor with regards to your post merit a finger of suspicion?
2) Why not put a vote on me anyways? If your vote isn't on anybody at the moment, having your vote on me would give us a better history of where your suspicions lie, as opposed to not voting.
3) What are your thoughts on the initial early ZDS pressure started by Silver and Rodemy?
Couple questions:
1) What do you mean by "elected affect"?
2) Are you sure that him seeming "in control and comfortable in his position" isn't just his self-imposed post restriction talking? And how is he acknowledging it's RVS in this post?
When I look at dkings, I see someone who is very much enjoying his posting restriction and having fun with it, not someone who is "in control and comfortable with his position". Can you point out specific posts that make you feel this way?
Also, seriously? You make one of the most tryhard posts of all time, someone votes you for it, and you're not even going to address it?
What did you think
meant?
A. ZDS strikes me as suspicious as well.
B. [i]It's page one of day one.[/i] Do you expect to get meaningful bandwagon analysis from this?
Do you live in like another time zone, or something? We're like 19 hours into the game. Why are you talking about bandwagon analysis and lynching lurkers when we're not even on page 3 of day one?
Hey ZDS?
Care to comment on this?
[*]If you get redirected, you will be told you are redirected but not to whom unless your ability would give information about that player.
[*]Day phases last 10 days and Night phases last 48 hours. Deadline for sending in night actions is 47 hours. I might shorten the phase lengths when the game progresses.[/list][/quote]
List tags are malformed.
Unvote, Vote Highroller
Justification?
Lmao I didn't think that "Bird" was actually a claim. My apologies. (I thought that everyone would either be one of the seven dwarves or another named character, not just a random generic bird)
Yes?
Maybe not actual bandwagon analysis per se, but other people's reactions or lack thereof can be telling. The game starts when the game starts.
Tell me exactly why you find ZDS suspicious? Is it mainly for him glossing over the fact that mafia have fake claims?
I do admit that my last game had 72 hour day phases
Not sure if you read my previous posts but my popping bottles theory was more of a thought experiment/thing for me to look back on and laugh rather than me accusing the six lowest posters of lurking, which is what I feel like you're suggesting.
Don't really feel the need to address it now; want to see how the game grows before engaging with him about it. Pretty much welcome pressure/talk about me right now as a way to jump start this game and to nail people's progressions on me later.
Then he changed his mind, which would've been perfectly fine and natural on its own:
But it wasn't just that. We also got a lot of blah blah blah: None of this was needed. It's just scum tossing out word confetti.
Side note: Highroller's formatting works for me but no thim because I'm a villager. QED.
And given that I'm assuming that DK is choosing to post that way and isn't acting out a role restriction I think my read of it follows. Obviously it's different if it is in fact a restriction.
Testing to see if it works now.
Which makes it evident that you are not a random generic, and since I am one, I think that merits FOS.. It's not that hard.
Well that's bullcrap.
First of all, every game on this site has a period of nonsense voting at the start, especially on page one of day one.
Second, the game started in the evening on a Tuesday and it's not even been 24 hours. Calling out low posters is fundamentally ridiculous.
That and his behavior rubs me as off.
Have you played no other games on this site?
So, you're now admitting it's fundamentally ridiculous, but when I point out it's fundamentally ridiculous, that's wrong?
I thought your vote was tryhard in all the wrong ways.[/quote]Says the guy who votes me with no rationale, and later, when pressed, says, "There's too many words?"
Someone fill in the blank for me. I'm willing to pardon Grape for now but could easily see myself squishing him.
Wait, am I not the only one here who takes laxatives recreationally? Interesting.
Axelrod/Highroller/CropCircles
I'm assuming you were making a list of the coolest people here, yes?
Initial thoughts: I think nothing of the supposed claims and posting restrictions, or whatever is going on there. I don't think anything can be gleaned from that. I think the early pile on ZDS was a bit unwarranted, and subsequently a bit sus. I'm also not a fan of of Prophylaxis calling attention to low posters so early. Seems like planting seeds early to justify votes later.
That's all I got for now.
For the record my Grapefruit vote was serious, but I also didn't put much faith into it.
Are you always this prudent and milquetoast?
Can you expand on Vaimes? Also why is Proph wolf "for postgame cred", as if you don't expect to ever actually pursue him?
See above. Why did you flavourclaim first thing if you are that aware of scum having fakeclaims?
---
1. silvercrys3467: Meh for having awful takes.
3. Rodemy: Town.
4. Prophylaxis: Low-hanging fruit? With a big question mark.
6. Vaimes: Town so let's get the most out of him before he gets bored and stops caring.
11. Highroller: Too many inconsistencies in his mindset, like Vaimes pointed out.
The rest:
Unvote, Vote: Highroller
Critters disunite, I guess.
No, dude, none of that makes any sense at all.
1. I always flavor claim first thing.
2. I'm BIRD. As in THIS GUY. Clearly I am the best role on the planet.
Look at this guy actually reading the sign up thread/remembering it at all. Well that probably does change things.
As for which posts it was just the sort of action taking you quoted as "having fun with his restriction".
My hot take is that this is highroller as town. Feels exactly like the guy I've tunneled so many times.
Is "elected affect" what you mean by dk's chosen posting restriction?
I'll address more stuff tomorrow
I don't really believe the team is you/Vaimes/Proph that would be pretty silly
And yes it is. Sometimes I like colorful language. Makes me feel clever. Unfortunately it usually leads to people having no clue what I mean.
@ZDS which of Silvers takes do you find terrible?
@Grape do you expect Highroll to be doing something else as scum rather than try to mimic is townplay?
I AM POSTING TO AVOID A PROD
ZDS STILL FEELS LIKE SCUM
OH LOOK A BIRD *stares at high roller* YUM!
I agree with Vaimes points on him in regards to how he is treating Cross just feels so off to me. Rod's gimmick thing he has going on here is weird and a tad annoying, but I don't think he would be this gutsy as people call it if scum. Vaimes is my top town atm.
This is something I expect from Wisp in the eod1 not from you at the very start. I agree that low posters tend to be scum in most cases, but I did not think of you the type to scum hunt that way normally you towncore up and work backwards.
Highroller (3): Vaimes, ZeDorkSlipeur, Jackrito
ZeDorkSlipeur (2): silvercrys3467, Rodemy
Vaimes (1): Prophylaxis
Prophylaxis (1): Dkingsland967
dkingsland (1): Grapefruit21
Not voting: Axelrod, Highroller, CropCircles42, TheRealStinkyJoeTerry
Please let
meRhand know ifIhe made any mistakes!>"if there's a mistake tell Rhand lol"
getting mixed messages Bur smh smh
This is not related to the "poppin bottles" theory
YOUR CALLING OF NAMES HAS ME MIFFED
AT LEAST I’M NOT POSTING ONLY GIFS
I’LL SEE YOU AT DAWN, I CHALLENGE YOUR NAME
what... no death battles? THATS LAME
IM UNSURE ON YOUR VOTE AND REASON
IS THIS A VOTE FROM SCUM THIS SEASON?
On the other hands, Highroller's claim or my own vague hints take zero guts. We have completely safe characters that raise no eyebrow.
Speaking of Highroller, Grape's meta read has convinced me to leave him be for the time being. Unvote
I did a quick re-read of Silver (scumspect #2 at the time) to see if he's worth a vote, but based on #20 it seems his scumreads on me and Vaimes (@Grapefruit) are rooted in us having opposing views in what counts as "gutsy". That's not scummy.
I'm not going to say anything on Jack or Proph because I don't have anything useful to say, but I'm observing.
Right now I want to Vote: CropCircles42.
This game is slow as a snail during a heatwave by the standards of any MTGS era.
These are vague and safe non-stances ("the early pile on ZDS was a bit unwarranted", "not a fan of Prophylaxis calling attention to low posters so early"), which he turns into potential votes later on ("subsequently a bit sus", "planting seeds early to justify votes later").
And no the irony of accusing him of doing what he's accusing Proph of doing is not lost on me. But there's my second issue with this post: whereas Proph is experimenting by looking for lurkers too early and is ******* up as a result, CC hides carefully in a dark corner and seems to mostly focus on not ******* up. To bring back the digestive track, Proph had guts, CC has none.
It may only be a single post but it's far more worth pursuing than any of the current wagons IMO.
OF COURSE HE DOES, ITS ALL JUST FICTION
IF YOU DO NOT TRUST THE FLAVOR
AND THERE’S FAKE CLAIMS SCUM CAN SAVOUR
WHY THE HELL WOULD YOU THINK, SON
THAT MY CLAIM WOULD BE A SCUM.
I DO NOT GET YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS
IT DOES NOT COMPUTE, BUT I DIGRESS
I MUST GO DRINKZ, AND SHOWER, AND EAT
VOTE STAYS ON YOU, OH HAMMER YEEEEEEET