KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
KoolKoal: Feel free to take this with a grain of salt since self meta isn't particularly helpful, but I think I get scumread mostly for style over substance, but also for a certain lack of substance over style. It's not so much what I AM posting most of the time (though sometimes that can seem bad) but what I'm NOT posting. I've been told I come to non-obvious conclusions a lot, so when I post, quite a bit of the time there's jumps in logic that people can't follow and they think that's scummy. I get that accusation about a lot of questions I ask specifically. People call them "busy work" when the questions are legit etc.
As far as things to ignore, I can't think of anything. I would suggest you focus less on what I'm doing and more on how I'm doing it. That's probably more likely to be accurate. Like I've just said, what I do tends to come off a little weird, but if you look for how I do it, mindset comes into play and maybe you figure out something useful.
How do you read that comment
That way? Makes no sense
I have had Shadow
As a town read since Day 1
Pay attention please
As for crumb, just look
"Do you find that ODD?" EVEN?
Most roles odd/even
Except yours, of course
Hence why I asked. Suspicious.
My role is on odds
I SET YOU ON RHAND?
G T F O. Called town!Rhand
Said his lynch dumb
Explain the wagons
Explain Rod/DV fight too
You are flailing scum
Killjoy, work is done
But takes extra time to frame
And save your buddy
I can understand
Why you're hesitant, it's tough
Under a barrel
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
Lots of copypastaing.
I'm fricken tired.
Are you suggesting
I not analyze wagons
Because you did it?
Curious to see just how
You try escaping
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
Then please explain why
You did not just dismiss Rum's
Godfather theory
But that is not crumb
It gives no hint of your role
Parity mod conf.
Will discuss passive
Miller in detail post game.
My shot even nights.
Would still like to know
What you meant when you said that
your role anti-town:
You pointed out that
I missed: Tom dies if scum hit.
Why entertain it?
But did you fight hard enough
To prevent the lynch?
Each vote that I made
Has reasoning behind it
Town can get it wrong
My growing concern
If you are town, tunneling
Then we have lost this
I am lynch
Shadow/Trog nightkill
Your lynch ends
If you are with town
Then Rod/Rum or Rum/Trog pairs.
What are your thoughts there.
If I am town then
How does that affect your read
Of Killjoy, still scum?
Can we please discuss
If a massclaim at this point
Should be happening?
We are one mislynch
Away from game in LyLo
ToMorrow too late.
Any objections
At least explain the reason
We need to solve this
Is dismissing it. Pretty plain.
You are overthinking.
Look at my iso
Multiple times "Rhand is town"
Said more 3 9 5
More 469
Explained why he was a bad lynch
Just ridiculous
If you're town, then read
Killjoy's done nothing this game
Other than vote town
Look at the wagons
Tell me if all town wagons
Make any sense there
Rod unlikely scum
Fought DV early. For Rum
There's a decent chance.
Sir Chris felt quite weird
And Ru hasnt done that much
But DV vote good
If you are not scum
Then the team is KJ/Rum
Flips could change; doubt it
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
Until Killjoy and Ruma
I will claim after
Trog is weird. Silent.
Cop, IC and Vig seems strong.
Not enough info
Bad lynch anyways
What would it tell us? Nothing.
Rather sort wagons
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
False claims hard to keep track of
Being scum and all >:[
It was not the note
That made me vote killjoy it
Was weirdness of night
As for shadow jump
Miscounted the votes on div
Explained in a post.
I sense sarcasm,
it is strong within this one.
Not falling for it.
If I am wrong on this one,
Town loss is on me...
Shadow's Thirty-Eight.
Out of the blue mention of
the Godfather role.
Started a reread,
Shadow is on multiple
radars as leanscum
Tom, Rod, Rhand, Killjoy
Chris, Dawningbluesky, Trog, Me
That is just Day One.
Anak even copped
Shadow thinking he was scum.
And only then died.
Night One and Night Two
No one claims they were roleblocked.
Shadow can safeclaim
"Stops" D_V nightkill
That plus Anak result
Cleared to win endgame.
The clincher for me
Is both Tom's role and his death
I elaborate:
Read tom on Day One
ScumShadow would fear that Tom
Would end up catching.
Why else kill Tom when
There is an IC and cop
That should have died first
Mechanical part
Tom with weak modifier
Is counter to cop
Can clear a Miller
And dies to a Godfather
Stops role being OP
If I am right here
Chris/Rum most likely partner
because of these posts:
And finally:
Vote: Shadowlancerx
Contrary to what I said
Earlier toDay
But when starting my
reread in light of recent
discussion with Ling
My paranoia
Returned in full force as it
All fell into place
Both of you are town I think
Help me look elsewhere
I want to lynch Rum
He didn’t even react
To being ‘nilla’d
Dota, great effort
But I would never kill Tom
If I could help it
I think the last scums
Are Ruman and Rodemy.
They smell off this game
Vote Rumanshi
Massclaim might be good
I want Rum and Rod first though
Don’t like that? Fight me
Godfather multiple posts
I'll reread, but still
Lynch doesnt make sense
When he should definitely
Be the kill tonight
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
I would like to hear your thoughts
On his alignment
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
I might be wrong about him
Still want rums claim though.
Huh. Your reaction.
More passive than expected.
Thought it would be fight.
Order of claim is
Rod/Rum/Killjoy/Lingerer
All others are known
@Osie
Any news on Trog
Replacement?
Rod/DV interactions
Don't feel like scum/scum
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
Before I am subjected
To a Derphammer
Thought occured to me
While I was driving home now
Rum not sending notes
Vanilla is for
Night I submit and next night.
KJ/Rod/Ling/Trog
Rum, can you confirm,
Did note say mod confirms Trog
Or just Trog is town?
Proven Psych's claim? Received note
From mod that he's town?
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
I'm willing to talk
We should figure out scum teams
We still have a while
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
Chris claimed note
Which is why I am
Asking Rum
Godfather not uncommon
Since town seens OP
Also wouldn't put
It past shadow to drop hints
Also also so
Dota is a scum
Trying to push shadow scum
When indeed he"s towm
Here is the thing tho
I was certain ahadow scum
Until anuk clear
So close to the end
I do not want to vote wrong
Targets? You can't prevent kills
If we know order.
I would choose random
So scum can't no kill scapegoat
Me tonight. The end.
Was bit paranoid
Of DotA/shadow gambit
But dots vote soothes me.
Former thought: gf
Exists, dot claims town Miller
Because likely cop.
DoTArchon (2): Rodemy, Rumanshi
Rumanshi (1): shadowlancerx
shadowlancerx (1): DoTArchon
Not voting: Killjoy, LnGrrrR, Psychatrog
Day ends when it is
23:59 of
Jan 24 EST
Lynch threshold this Day
is reached when a player has
reached four votes on them.
There's some potential
of Psychatrog replacement.
Here is to hoping.
Clarify your role.
One shot? Even?
Instead "dota is a scum"
Should pay attention
The vote count would look pretty
Waiting on the claims.
Factional abilities
Can’t be vanilla’d
Am not asking that
We claim who we will target,
Suggesting massclaim.
If we mislynch now
Then tomorrow is Lylo
No chance to test claims
Three of the seven
Remaining players are known
Roughly half the game
Want massclaim today
More info then tomorrow
Hold accountable
TownRod is Tracker?
TownShadow is Roleblocker?
Massclaim today helps
Especially since
We can guarantee that one
Claim will be a lie
Who is sending notes?
No one has admitted to
Having that role yet
If they claim now then
We can dig into meaning
Of messages sent
Or they will false claim,
We can try to work out who
Is lying and lynch
Rod has already
Made a partial claim of role
So he can go first
Then Ruman,
Claim and answer me
About Trog
Killjoy, Lingerer
Are only two left to claim
After Rod/Rum do
Personally I
Do not mind which of you first
But Ling wants KJ
Shadowlancer, I
Would like your thoughts on how our
Roles co-exist here
Stop abilities
Both of us are capable
And on the same night
You can't stop a kill
But I can
Other than that though
It is somewhat weird to me
I worry you're scum
I need to reread
The whole entire game soon
Prolly before lynch.
One shot protect even nights
Night 2 protect trog.
You claimed track before. Where is?
Explain this please. Thanks.
Protect trog night 1 i did
Odd night was my track
On even nights is loudmouth,
How cool is that, eh?
On odd nights I have,
The role of visitor,
Yeah, that's what it is
So vanilla'd was
Not concerning to me, as
I do not do much
Trog indeed sent a,
Message claiming town, and it
Seems it was confirmed.
I still believe in
Godfather, is possible,
It's just a thought, though
And what is visiter, eh?
Never heard of them, eh.
**** i cannot play tonight.
Much personal *****
Drinling does not help
Brain not straight tonight at all
Goodnight sorry guys
I am targeted, reveal
names at the next day
Visitor is role
I can visit others yeah,
But I do nothing
Visit me tonight
If you do not believe me
Shall prove my claim, yeah
Who was visited
on Night One?
Is almost 2am now,
required for me
will answer question
Upon awakening, yeah?
TImezones Are OP
Not gonna post all votecounts
Like I had planned to.
I did look at all
the Votecounts though; Worlds emerged.
Some things to say here.
Agree with LnGrrrR
about shadow: town! ...deep wolf?
Occum's Razor: town.
Most D1 on DV
DV tried to wagon him
Counter to his own
Here is final wagon.
Probably scum is on it.
So, DotA or trog.
Linger, Rumanshi
not aligned? adjecent votes.
Seventy percent.
Actually, had thought.
About trog's claim. I got note
as well. Maybe same?
Mine was not Child.
Anak had no note pass skills.
So, why'd I get it?
Did Psychotrog lie?
about nature of his skill?
Can't be from Anak..........
I think if trog's note,
Rod and trog unaligned.
And trog is scum there.
Focusing: Trog, Dot.
Could be scum: D1 VCs.
Note has been made there.
Rereading D2
Maybe tom DID delay kill.
But kill as on Rhand.
Wait no. Rhand passive.
Nevermind, I'm just wrong there.
Koo ka choo walrus.
Anyway, more stuff.
DotA was on Rhand all Day.
Unvoted sole once.
His vote stayed all Day
On the now confirmed town Rhand.
That is worth noting.
This quote gives me pause.
If scum driven, why point out
that we're ignore that?
THIS. I GOT THAT NOTE.
Choices too. Targeted Rod.
HAS to be scum skill.
Based on this, Rod town.
Even with claim messing up.
Last Ride of the Day!
FOCUS DAMN YOU
WAGON ANALYZE
DISTRACTIONS
Final d3 log.
All scum on D_V, or trog
Given atmosphere
of D3, prob the former.
DV YOLO'd, lost.
Today. All unknown
On DotA, but no one's known
Alive today, though.
Is DotA just scum?
Did I put too much faith: claim?
Maybe so? The end.
Ok. Considering.
Dot is right lynch for ToDay.
Might answer some stuff.
Your post here later
Your claim please?
I am even night Tracker.
Full, not just one shot.
Targeted Anak
Night two. He did what he said.
Le obviously.
Killjoy, your thoughts on Dot's claim
I pushed for Rhand lynch?
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
Other than that killjoys post
Is a pleasant read.
Only your claim is
Outstanding
Please explain bolded
Not sure what it is you are
You are saying here.
Here is note
That you said you got.
Target Rod?
About claim,
Do you believe Rod
One shot track?
Miller vanilla maker,
right? I think that's it.
Not spending much time
gaming this here setup though
to figure out scum.
I've never seen it.
Vanillamaker Miller
Not impossible.
What does pushing Rhand
have to do with anything?
Omnislash Limit.
Didn't say before, but note
gave choice: living dude.
Rod got note with choice
Note became about that guy.
Same with me, but Rod.
Strongly believe note.
Which is why Town Rod likely.
Note provides fake info.
I do believe claim.
Not enough setup info
to say otherwise.
That's why I grilled him
continuously re: claim
Do you believe it?
Target is unaffected
By any powers
Except killing roles
I can target on odd nights
As for my targets
Hit Anak D1
Then rod Night 3. Suspicion
Was my reason why.
KJ, look upthread
Read what Dota said re: Rhand
Defending his vote
Club Flamingo Wins: 1!
Will be around tomorrow
To do all the things
Shadow scum if godfather
Dota could be too.
If killjoy is scum
Holy ***** he doesn't seem
Tin foil hat hat
Lingerer also.
Role itself seems out of place
Also no "town!" vibes
Definite scum
in those three people right there
Likely dota tho.
Rumi feels okay.
That slot hasn't posted much
Policy lynch soon?
In order of want
To lynch: Dota Shadow Grr
Rumi killjoy nullllll