After investigating with Annorax, I have good news and bad news. First, your post! You broke something in that line where you use the ER examples. At least, that's all we've been able to come up with. That's the good news.
The bad news, it looks like the symbol ^ may be the issue.
We'll keep working on figuring out what's wrong with your post.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
She wants a ride on the pony, dude.
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
EDIT: I should also note that so far, D is the only letter we know that works. And it MUST be alone. We tried F and that failed. We also tried "dee" and that failed.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
She wants a ride on the pony, dude.
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
:ER:. Except b not that last
:ER:. Except c not that last
:ER:. Except d not that last
:ER:. Except e not that last
:ER:. Except f not that last
:ER:. Except g not that last
:ER:. Except h not that last
:ER:. Except i not that last
:ER:. Except j not that last
:ER:. Except k not that last
:ER:. Except l not that last
:ER:. Except m not that last
:ER:. Except n not that last
:ER:. Except o not that last
:ER:. Except p not that last
:ER:. Except q not that last
:ER:. Except r not that last
:ER:. Except s not that last
:ER:. Except t not that last
:ER:. Except u not that last
:ER:. Except v not that last
:ER:. Except w not that last
:ER:. Except x not that last
:ER:. Except y not that last
:ER:. Except z not that last
So these are the acceptable letters, D O P and V
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
She wants a ride on the pony, dude.
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
2011: Best Mafia Performance (Individual) - Best Newcomer
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
As delightful as this conversation is, I feel like we should try to maintain this space for discussions that require Council input. Thanks for understanding.
I think we seriously need to look at the review/game submission process. I have been sitting nearly a MONTH now without any qualified reviewers for my game. I have attempted to mass PM the Specialty/FTQ reviewers and got ignored. The only people who have asked to review is Generic (Who could most likely do it just fine if it was not a specialty,) and masterplum (who is still new to the site.) I think we need to allow people to submit again without reviewers, if only because it seems we lack anything representing an ample amount of reviewers at this point.
I think we seriously need to look at the review/game submission process. I have been sitting nearly a MONTH now without any qualified reviewers for my game. I have attempted to mass PM the Specialty/FTQ reviewers and got ignored. The only people who have asked to review is Generic (Who could most likely do it just fine if it was not a specialty,) and masterplum (who is still new to the site.) I think we need to allow people to submit again without reviewers, if only because it seems we lack anything representing an ample amount of reviewers at this point.
I agree with this - some of the people on there are a bit inactive/flaky, while some good reviewers aren't up on there.
I know I've been trying to look at a couple of Specialties/Minis and trying to get some experience, but that's a pretty haphazard way of doing it.
Hmm. I've been taking on more reviewing duties than I have in the past, but there's definitely a decrease in the old core that used to carry that torch.
On the other hand, I still see setups with some really serious ticking time bombs in many of the first drafts, and I wouldn't want those getting through. I'd definitely prefer to add more reviewers to the list.
In regards to reviewing, I feel like I've reviewed 90% of the setups on the hosting list >_> The only reason I'm not offering my hand is because I'd like to be able to play sometime, too. But yes, more reviewers are definitely necessary. Isn't AI in charge of qualifying reviewers?
2011: Best Mafia Performance (Individual) - Best Newcomer
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
2011: Best Mafia Performance (Individual) - Best Newcomer
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
I think that the most important thing in regards to reviewing is reliable communication between the setup designer and the reviewer. If the reviewer/designer flakes the setup's kind in an awkward spot.
I can recommend:
- Megiddo
- HookerPunch
- Taredas
I've seen them all in action and they do pretty well.
I don't remember anyone being in charge of qualifying reviewers since Xyre left; I remember a long time ago I was qualified to review Basics but my name isn't still on there.
Last I recall, AI was in charge of approving reviewers before Xyre was - AI approved me for everything except Specialties, and then I got Xyre's approval for the latter.
2011: Best Mafia Performance (Individual) - Best Newcomer
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
I posted this in the hosting thread and it looks like it got misconstrued by a couple people.
I'm volunteering to be Secretary Pro Temperom until Void comes back. I have a PM in my inbox asking if they can post sign ups. Just need a heads up or "yay" or "nay" here. I apologize if I'm overstepping my bounds; just thought I could be of help.
2011: Best Mafia Performance (Individual) - Best Newcomer
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
2011: Best Mafia Performance (Individual) - Best Newcomer
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
I know, but it is apparently a problem with getting enough qualified people.
The idea was brought up that some people didn't need reviews, and my suggestion is that everyone still needs reviews, but you could loosen the requirements from two people on a list of qualified people to two people including one from a list of qualified people.
I know, but it is apparently a problem with getting enough qualified people.
The idea was brought up that some people didn't need reviews, and my suggestion is that everyone still needs reviews, but you could loosen the requirements from two people on a list of qualified people to two people including one from a list of qualified people.
I actually thought that was the rule. I'm in favor of this.
I can get behind this as well, as now it will mean we can get even more qualified reviewers, as they will be basically be trained by the qualified reviewer.
I know, but it is apparently a problem with getting enough qualified people.
The idea was brought up that some people didn't need reviews, and my suggestion is that everyone still needs reviews, but you could loosen the requirements from two people on a list of qualified people to two people including one from a list of qualified people.
Make it so. Also, bear in mind that anyone who has previously run an FTQ or PCQ is fair game as a qualified reviewer, per the current rules. For clarity's sake, we could potentially list those people explicitly in the hosting thread.
Make it so. Also, bear in mind that anyone who has previously run an FTQ or PCQ is fair game as a qualified reviewer, per the current rules. For clarity's sake, we could potentially list those people explicitly in the hosting thread.
I posted this in the hosting thread and it looks like it got misconstrued by a couple people.
I'm volunteering to be Secretary Pro Temperom until Void comes back. I have a PM in my inbox asking if they can post sign ups. Just need a heads up or "yay" or "nay" here. I apologize if I'm overstepping my bounds; just thought I could be of help.
Arn
Missed this on first read-through, that would be terrific.
Yeah, my basic is really slow filling up. I'm ok with dropping back onto the queue while we wait for another to finish. It feels like 2 is the best option.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
She wants a ride on the pony, dude.
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
2011: Best Mafia Performance (Individual) - Best Newcomer
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
@Generic:
Talk to those running the Cross Town Mafia games. They will have the answer. PM them. I believe there 6? in total.
Over in Mostly Mute, we're having a lot of trouble with malfunctioning smilies, where sometimes they'll work and sometimes not. See this post for an example: http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/outside-magic/mafia/548994-mostly-mute-monk-mafia-day-1?comment=55
Is there something we're doing wrong? While survivable, it's a little problematic for a game that relies on smilies pretty heavily.
Thanks!
The issue is punctuation!
Note the :ER:, !:ER: and ~ ~ differences!
This is site-wide issue, so when making smilies, don't forget to add the space! It must be on both sides!
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
The bad news, it looks like the symbol ^ may be the issue.
We'll keep working on figuring out what's wrong with your post.
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
So watch this **** get crazy!
So we're talking :ER:. But this won't work!
But then we keep talking :ER:. And add a d to make work!
Don't ask why. But adding a D does something...
Quick test :ER:. And a d, with a comma?
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
My wife's nickname is "D", so must be true!
EDIT: I should also note that so far, D is the only letter we know that works. And it MUST be alone. We tried F and that failed. We also tried "dee" and that failed.
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
I'm trying it for myself.
D :ER:...
So these are the acceptable letters, D O P and V
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
{мы, тьма}
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
I think we seriously need to look at the review/game submission process. I have been sitting nearly a MONTH now without any qualified reviewers for my game. I have attempted to mass PM the Specialty/FTQ reviewers and got ignored. The only people who have asked to review is Generic (Who could most likely do it just fine if it was not a specialty,) and masterplum (who is still new to the site.) I think we need to allow people to submit again without reviewers, if only because it seems we lack anything representing an ample amount of reviewers at this point.
Come join us in the MTGSalvation chat ||| My trade thread. ||| My Personal Modern Blog: The Fetchlands
I agree with this - some of the people on there are a bit inactive/flaky, while some good reviewers aren't up on there.
I know I've been trying to look at a couple of Specialties/Minis and trying to get some experience, but that's a pretty haphazard way of doing it.
Why is basic 86 not in signups? It needs to be.
On the other hand, I still see setups with some really serious ticking time bombs in many of the first drafts, and I wouldn't want those getting through. I'd definitely prefer to add more reviewers to the list.
Not the Council's job. Ask the Secretary.
-
In regards to reviewing, I feel like I've reviewed 90% of the setups on the hosting list >_> The only reason I'm not offering my hand is because I'd like to be able to play sometime, too. But yes, more reviewers are definitely necessary. Isn't AI in charge of qualifying reviewers?
{мы, тьма}
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
{мы, тьма}
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
I can recommend:
- Megiddo
- HookerPunch
- Taredas
I've seen them all in action and they do pretty well.
I don't remember anyone being in charge of qualifying reviewers since Xyre left; I remember a long time ago I was qualified to review Basics but my name isn't still on there.
{мы, тьма}
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
As far as specialties and FTQs though... Well I am on the FTQ list by default, but well yeah can't self review.
Come join us in the MTGSalvation chat ||| My trade thread. ||| My Personal Modern Blog: The Fetchlands
I posted this in the hosting thread and it looks like it got misconstrued by a couple people.
I'm volunteering to be Secretary Pro Temperom until Void comes back. I have a PM in my inbox asking if they can post sign ups. Just need a heads up or "yay" or "nay" here. I apologize if I'm overstepping my bounds; just thought I could be of help.
Arn
{мы, тьма}
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
You do need setup reviews though. Incredibly important
{мы, тьма}
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player
The idea was brought up that some people didn't need reviews, and my suggestion is that everyone still needs reviews, but you could loosen the requirements from two people on a list of qualified people to two people including one from a list of qualified people.
I actually thought that was the rule. I'm in favor of this.
Come join us in the MTGSalvation chat ||| My trade thread. ||| My Personal Modern Blog: The Fetchlands
Reviewers?
Come join us in the MTGSalvation chat ||| My trade thread. ||| My Personal Modern Blog: The Fetchlands
Make it so. Also, bear in mind that anyone who has previously run an FTQ or PCQ is fair game as a qualified reviewer, per the current rules. For clarity's sake, we could potentially list those people explicitly in the hosting thread.
That may not be a bad idea actually.
[/quote]
Come join us in the MTGSalvation chat ||| My trade thread. ||| My Personal Modern Blog: The Fetchlands
Missed this on first read-through, that would be terrific.
Keep in mind that the most recent Basic was only filled after substantial offsite help.
I could also honestly see two minis at a time as well.
Mafia Stats
Kill shot: BB
Issue with my shooting? Please visit my helpdesk and help me learn to aim!
{мы, тьма}
2012: Best (False?) Role Claim - Worst Town Performance (Group) - Best Mafia Performance (Group) - Best SK Performance - Best Overall Player
2013: Best Non-SK Neutral Performance
2014: Best Town Performance (Individual) - Best Town Performance (Group) - Most Interesting Role - Best Game - Best Overall Player
2015: Worst Mafia Performance (Group) - Best Read
2016: Best Town Performance (Group) - Best Town Player - Best Overall Player