At this point, I think the neutral is a better choice than pibbly. Someone we know is against us or someone who just isn't posting? Vote arimneas
Or we can discuss things. There are more options available than arminaes and Pibbly. There's definately no point lynching Pibbly at this point, and armineas might not be the right choice either.
That post is extremely scummy.. it seems to me what you're trying to do is quicken the day by presenting two choices to the town. While there are quite a few more of us alive, and quite a few more lynch candidates, including you...
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
_______________________________ [L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
Vigging the claimed neutral wouldn't be a terrible idea (if someone's still available to do it). However, we could be very very close to LYLO. If there were 5 mafia- not impossible- then the mafia have 4 out of 10 and we're already at LYLO. If there's only 3 mafia, then 3 out of 10 and we're one day away from LYLO.
As such, I think we need to work harder to find an actual mafia, not just say "lynch the neutral". Lynch the neutral if he's our best choice for scum, but I think we have some better information than that. Here goes.
As I've pointed out before, cp's dock list contained characters called "Assassin" and "Usurper" among others. We now have a minor problem- "maiden" (LFR's character) was in the list of second words, not third words, so there's now one more role in the list than was actually at the Docks.
Living people who were at the docks night 1:
Chimpanzee
DYH
Fayul
RafaelK
Sutherlands
I am The Chancellor. From fadeblue's exchange with DYH on day 2, I think I know what DYH is claiming but he should confirm. Sutherlands' and Fayul's claims are obvious (and if Fayul's role isn't the obvious one, she can wait until last and counterclaim).
This leaves Chimpanzee to claim, and from what I can see no good options on the board.
unvote, vote Chimpanzee
Name-claim kthx.
I definitely want Pibbly to talk. The day should not end without Pibbly talking, since he's obviously around enough to pick locations, and so should be around enough to give us his opinions.
Or we can discuss things. There are more options available than arminaes and Pibbly. There's definately no point lynching Pibbly at this point, and armineas might not be the right choice either.
That post is extremely scummy.. it seems to me what you're trying to do is quicken the day by presenting two choices to the town. While there are quite a few more of us alive, and quite a few more lynch candidates, including you...
How many wrong things can you say in one post... first, I never said this was one choice or the other, I said that lynching arim was better than lynching Pibbly. arim might be the right choice, because he could very well be the SK. There was absolutely nothing scummy about that post, except the things that you made up about it. Oh, and at this point, I disagree that I am a lynch target at all. In a few days it is possible, but unlikely.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Level 1 Judge
Hey, you! Yeah, you behind the computer screen! You're unconstitutional.
How many wrong things can you say in one post... first, I never said this was one choice or the other, I said that lynching arim was better than lynching Pibbly. arim might be the right choice, because he could very well be the SK. There was absolutely nothing scummy about that post, except the things that you made up about it. Oh, and at this point, I disagree that I am a lynch target at all. In a few days it is possible, but unlikely.
OK.. I can live with that. I guess I saw stuff which may or may not have been there. The way I read it was sort of like you were saying "armin or pibbly... hmmm.... vote armin." Why did you vote him anyway? Do you think he is today's lynch? Do you not understand why lynching the neutral is bad?
Oh, and we are all lynch targets. Even me.
I accept the explanation, but I'd still like to know why you voted.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
_______________________________ [L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
It's quite possible that "The Assassin" is also town - although if the assassin is, in fact, our retard vig, we should probably lynch him anyways
Are you trying to give your scum buddy clues as to how to claim? It sounds there like you know what's about to happen, and you're trying to pre-explain it away.
Chimp is going to have to either try and explain away a suspicious name or else get into a counterclaim fight with one of me, DYH, Fayul or Sutherlands.
He's going to do this in his own words.
Anyone else trying to give him some assistance in doing this is either scum or being an incredibly bad townie by letting him out of explaining himself.
I want to see Chimp talk (because I think he's cornered scum), and I want to see Pibbly talk (because I think he's lurking lurking scum). Since Fayul has no report today, I think that's the plan. If Pibbly and Chimp are both convincing, I'll rethink. I think the odds at this point are strongly against both of them being town, though.
Re Sutherlands:
Without a counterclaim, I am 100% unwilling to lynch Sutherlands. End of story.
It occurs to me that we now have a doc out and a cop out and it's day 4 and we still haven't seen what superpower justifies bertrand's claimed restriction. And he just tried to lay suspicion on a non-counterclaimed doc.
There's something to look out for when we do our mass claim (which will probably occur sooner rather than later).
I've pretty well claimed already, and frankly, I'd like to see what Chimp pulls out for his claim before solidifying my piece. It ought to be easy enough to see that I'm telling the truth by going back through that exchange.
Didn't like Bertrand's last sets of posts, either. Becoming very suspicious of roles that "have to be somewhere", as to Raf's point- all the traditional power roles are pretty well out.
I am the Bastard, the king's bastard son. Upon hearing of of the prince's disappearance my mother gave me a love letter the king wrote to her long ago and sent me to the castle to try to claim my place among the royal family.
Im terribly sorry, i have no excuse about my absence. I simply didn't read to the end of the thread. I had a mod prod, so i read the first part of what i hadn't read, saw fayul cop claim, saw vote, vote and assumed that not much else happened that day. I then picked alehouse again, as i saw no reason to change.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Thanks to Legacy15 and Butteblues18 for the Sig and Avatar!
I'm normally one to dissuade lynches based on poor play, but -jesus- Pibb.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
Aharr, me hearties. Sorry this be rather late, I've been concentratin' on me own game, and school as well.
Pibbly PBPA
#9 - Random vote; nothing to see here. #203 - Now with 200% more fence sitting. Says loran's foses are "odd." Says he is confused by "this entire Sutherland thing" and doesn't commit to any opinion one way or the other. #323 - Now that fade and CP have backpedaled after realizing Sutherlands' role, Pibbly says he thinks Sutherlands is town. Fishes for an explicit statement of why they backed off Sutherlands. #355 - Takes the middle ground on whether or not we should use foses. Says he thinks CP and fade are scummy for the about-face on Sutherlands, but says he'll drop it because nobody else seems interested (!). #481 - Says he believes Nom Anor's claim. Does not commit to whether or not he'll go to the docks, saying he will choose randomly. Expresses support for the UVP wagon, but refuses to place his own vote (!). #550 - Now commits to non-docks. #646 - Votes UVP (in spirit), though for reasons other people had already stated. Encourages case against Zchinque. #647 - Actually votes UVP. #704 - Reposts list of where people are going at night. I have no idea what he intended by his "it should be an interesting night" comment, but I don’t like it. It feels like he knew more than he should. #747 - Posts list of people at ale house. Says Nom_Anor being blocked seems logical, but then gives a totally nonsensical reason as to why. Is anti-loran. #811 - Sort of claims some kind of information role. Seems to be against Nom_Anor, but jabs CP's credibility as well.
And post 992, yeh can read above.
So what we've got is a pattern o' rampant lurking, fence-sitting, votes and general casting of suspicion against townies, several rehashes of information which teh me feel like attempts to score townie points with contributing, and some vague allusions to possibly having extra information.
Vote Pibbly. Down to the depths with ya, yeh scurvy dog.
It occurs to me that we now have a doc out and a cop out and it's day 4 and we still haven't seen what superpower justifies bertrand's claimed restriction. And he just tried to lay suspicion on a non-counterclaimed doc.
There's something to look out for when we do our mass claim (which will probably occur sooner rather than later).
It's not much of a superpower, and it's not much of a restriction.
I am the Bastard, the king's bastard son. Upon hearing of of the prince's disappearance my mother gave me a love letter the king wrote to her long ago and sent me to the castle to try to claim my place among the royal family.
This sounds exactly like what could easliy be the flavor for being scum... please explain yourself a bit better.
You guys are jumping on the lurker, but reading his posts it's extremely hard to tell his alignment. Mostly because there are so few of them. But I don't like this case.. this is NOT the time to hunt lurkers. Arimnaes seems to have proceeded with a rather unsual method of science (which I see a lot of in PBPAs, and am guilty of myself), and that is to reach a conclusion (that Pibbly is scum), and the find evidence to support it.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
_______________________________ [L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
Im terribly sorry, i have no excuse about my absence. I simply didn't read to the end of the thread. I had a mod prod, so i read the first part of what i hadn't read, saw fayul cop claim, saw vote, vote and assumed that not much else happened that day. I then picked alehouse again, as i saw no reason to change.
OK.
So you're going to say something now, right? Because apologizing for not speaking means nothing if you then continue to not speak.
Oh, and Chimp.... well, your claim would mean cp was inventing BOTH of the dodgiest names there, "Assassin" and "Usurper" both. Also, I have only two words in my name, but cp's list backs me up that Chancellor is a second word and also I'm just... The Chancellor because there is only one Chancellor in the kingdom, and it's me. I am THE Chancellor. Why do you only have two words in your name?
Or are you, in fact, "The Bastard Usurper"? Fitting much more with cp's list and with the naming conventions in this game?
Not to mention that even the way you've described "The Bastard" sounds like you left out the bit where you've come to take over the Kingdom ahead of the rightful heir.
vote Chimpanzee, but this may change to Pibbly if Pibbly doesn't talk convincingly. I think both of them are very strong targets.
Rumours begin to spread that the Prince was killed by traitors to
the realm, who may even have infiltrated the court itself! Now, in this
time of trouble, the loyal members of the Court must work together to
find and execute the traitors so that the next King is not drawn from
their ranks as must surely be their plan.
Doesn't this sound like what Cimp described? Something in that flavor claim is ringing alarm bells. I want to hear from Chimp. Clarify please.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
_______________________________ [L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
Full Claim
Chief Footman - I am essentially the head butler
I have two abilities. The first is i am a roleblocker.
The second is that if there are more traitors than crown in the location i stay at, then i recieve notice of this. My pm also alluded to the fact that the Royal Chef was a miller for my ability, as it says that i hate him, but believe him to be loyal.
I have only used my RB once, on Wrath of Dog, on night 2, the one where he died.
My second ability was the main reason that i didnt want to stay at the
docks the first night. There was no chance that if i went there, that it would trigger. I was also attempting find the Chef at the ale house (hoping for some sort of food connection, making him go to the alehouse). This would make the chance of getting a positive result greater. And the ability has never triggered.
Thats all for my claim.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Thanks to Legacy15 and Butteblues18 for the Sig and Avatar!
So there has never been more traitors than crown at your location the entire game, if you're telling the truth. Well, that's a decent amount of information if true.
Could you give us a wrap-up of who's been in your location each night?
Also, who do you think is scummiest at the moment (and why)?
Looking back at Pibbly's posts, especially around the time that my bandwagon stopped, I am going to Vote Pibbly. It seems like an easy role to fake. I still think DYH is town, because that role would be too powerful as mafia. arim is obviously neutral, bertrand i'm still not sure on. What I was saying earlier about him is that when people voted for him during the day there was only one kill at night.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Level 1 Judge
Hey, you! Yeah, you behind the computer screen! You're unconstitutional.
--
(I'm on on this site much anymore. If you want to get in touch it's probably best to email me: dom@heffalumps.org)
Forum Awards: Best Writer 2005, Best Limited Strategist 2005-2012
5CB PotM - June 2005, November 2005, February 2006, April 2008, May 2008, Feb 2009
MTGSalvation Articles: 1-20, plus guest appearance on MTGCast #86!
<Limited Clan>
Okay, pibbly is lynched, because I am totally willing to drop the hammer here.
Now, we just need to get to our discussion. Someone please unvote pibbly pro tempore so we don't have another axel situation.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
ebdp: If there is an unexpected hammer, here's all you need to know:
I'll be going Outside the City walls tonight. Chimpanzee will be following me. In addition, other people can go if they like: I need at least 1 other person to go, because Chimp needs to be lynched if he doesn't show up, and I might not make it alive, or the mafia's moving ability might go to more than one place.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
I am going to go back and verify what Sutherlands is saying about Bertrand for myself. If that's truly the case, we need to take a hard look at him. I'm already suspicious of his injection of himself into today's proceedings so heavily after being a relative non-factor up for the past few days. Not to mention that if the ability isn't that great, I don't understand not joining the rest of us at the docks, or why it was such a big fiasco day one about voting/fosing him.
Now for everyone else:
Arimnaes I've written off as neutral, but could be scum hiding behind that claim. Great vig target if we have one left.
It's pretty apparent that Chimp is lying about his name to me, honestly. I'm between him and Bertrand for likely SK.
Fayul is clear as the cop.
Pibbly's behavior is terrible, and it's awfully suspicious that he can get back in time to put in a location but not contribute. I wouldn't be upset to put my votes back here once we've exhausted discussion if nothing comes of it.
RafK has been a lot less aggressive than usual this game, but in his last two games where he played that way he had an investigative role which he could use to back up his assertions and that's clearly not the case here.
I mentioned my unease about Salubrious, and it'd be nice to hear some more from him. To review, volunteering that Fayul and others were missing from the Docks was helpful, but as I stated earlier, could be a misdirection ploy. He was also so helpful as to guide UVP (to his credit who did turn up town) on how not to answer my question day one against my clear instruction.
Sutherlands is clear as the doc.
I'm pretty neutral on Wuffles II; aside from his non-participation at the Docks, he hasn't done anything notable.
I only wanted one to unvote, not 2. =/ Vote: Pibbly.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
Besides the claim and narrowing down to him out of all the night 1 docks people, I don't really have much against Chimp's actual play, whereas Pibbly's lurking, failure to give opinions etc is worse I guess.
Plus, Pibbly's claimed ability is really weak. I notice looking down his claimed list that the only thing he could know from his ability is that arim, salubrious and wuffles can't all be scum together. He needs to be with more people than that to learn anything, but never bothered trying to do so (coughdockscough).
So I'm agreeable with taking out Pibbly before Chimp. They were the two people on my list, after all.
Strongly agree with Fayul and Chimp going Beyond The City Walls to try and inspect Chimp. We might well see a repeat performance, but on the same token it's possible that Fayul's theory is right or that Pibbly is the scum kidnapper. Can but try.
Looking over DYH's list, I more or less agree with his summing up. I would add that I don't regard DYH as being quite as clear as many do. His quad-vote conveniently went missing after 1 day, and people had relied on that to clear him. Plus he seems to have a slightly iffy rolename, and thus far rolenames do seem to be a little important.
We again, need one other person beyond the docks to confirm that chimp was there if I don't go there. Anyone with nothing better to do?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
Err, not if I "don't go", if i don't -end up- there. Poor choice of words.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
Unless anyone else has something I'm comfortable with the lynch here.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
Ugh, playing over the Christmas holidays was a big mistake, had no time for the game. And DYH, it only takes 1 min to pm saying no action and going to the alehouse, but it takes at least half an hour (for me, usually more) to produce a post that doesnt immedietly gets torn apart by the townies (and scum) looking for any mistake.
Id really like to know exactly what Bertrand has been hiding all this time. It seems that he has gone with the ploy and has not really produced much else all game. I think that its time he spill the beans. As sutherland also pointed out, there was an extra kill the night no one voted bertrand. Coincedence?
Also, what ever happened with Sutherland's training? did that ever get completed? Im really curious about that as its day four, with no evidence that it happened. So im curious there.
Also, there is Saliburus. Not sure what to say about him, but he just seems off to me. Im not going to go over posts and point out exactly what it is, because really, im not sure. Just a gut feeling.
That all i really have to say. Towns about to get very close to losing.....
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Thanks to Legacy15 and Butteblues18 for the Sig and Avatar!
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, the wisdom to know the difference, and a ****ing chainsaw.
Well here's my role:
I was sent to the castle with a love letter from the king to my mother. Each night I can choose a player, and if I'm in a location alone with that player I can reveal the letter to that player, verifying my identity to that player (gamewise they receive my role name and allegiance from the mod) so you don't need to waste the investigation on me as long as someone volunteers to go to a location alone with me.
I really don't quite get flavorfully why my role is town, but it is listed as it and I can easily prove it.
Well, good. Fayul and DYH are both going to Beyond the City Walls to test you. Fayul will try to investigate you and you can reveal yourself (not like that!) to DYH. And then we will know.
One wonders, if you can reveal your identity and allegiance to a player every night and most people have committed to a location every night (allowing you to easily pick someone out to talk) why you have to ask to confirm yourself tonight rather than, say, pointing to someone you've already told.
I think I disagree with Salubrious and bertrand going to Beyond the City Walls. If there's a scum ability that needs to be in the same place as the townie it's used on, let's limit the amount of people sharing with Fayul tonight. Chimp and DYH is sufficient.
I need to both be able to find a place where there is only one other person and be able to know who that person is. I opted to go with the docks thing night 1 because going anywhere else would be a total shot in the target for who to target and where to go. Night 2 there wasn't enough locations claimed for me to set up my ability. I went alehouse since Kenji was the only person who had claimed going there and targetted Kenji but there ended up being several people there so my ability failed. Night 3 I just went docks again since there was another mass docking that could benefit the town and going anywhere else would have been a total shot in the dark again. Its actually pretty hard to use my ability without a complete location claim or the town cooperatively setting up the necessary conditions.
Plan still stands. If Fayul doesn't get moved, she investigates you. If she does get moved, you'll be alone with only DYH.
This makes it even more important:
ONLY FAYUL, CHIMP AND DYH are to be BEYOND THE CITY WALLS.
I'm going to add something else, at this point, since I'm worried and I'm starting to want my ability to be available if I need it. My ability requires me to able to research in the library undisturbed. Hence-
Or we can discuss things. There are more options available than arminaes and Pibbly. There's definately no point lynching Pibbly at this point, and armineas might not be the right choice either.
That post is extremely scummy.. it seems to me what you're trying to do is quicken the day by presenting two choices to the town. While there are quite a few more of us alive, and quite a few more lynch candidates, including you...
_______________________________
[L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
As such, I think we need to work harder to find an actual mafia, not just say "lynch the neutral". Lynch the neutral if he's our best choice for scum, but I think we have some better information than that. Here goes.
As I've pointed out before, cp's dock list contained characters called "Assassin" and "Usurper" among others. We now have a minor problem- "maiden" (LFR's character) was in the list of second words, not third words, so there's now one more role in the list than was actually at the Docks.
Living people who were at the docks night 1:
Chimpanzee
DYH
Fayul
RafaelK
Sutherlands
Surviving Roles:
Assassin
Chancellor
Diplomat
Magician
Physician
Usurper
I am The Chancellor. From fadeblue's exchange with DYH on day 2, I think I know what DYH is claiming but he should confirm. Sutherlands' and Fayul's claims are obvious (and if Fayul's role isn't the obvious one, she can wait until last and counterclaim).
This leaves Chimpanzee to claim, and from what I can see no good options on the board.
unvote, vote Chimpanzee
Name-claim kthx.
I definitely want Pibbly to talk. The day should not end without Pibbly talking, since he's obviously around enough to pick locations, and so should be around enough to give us his opinions.
How many wrong things can you say in one post... first, I never said this was one choice or the other, I said that lynching arim was better than lynching Pibbly. arim might be the right choice, because he could very well be the SK. There was absolutely nothing scummy about that post, except the things that you made up about it. Oh, and at this point, I disagree that I am a lynch target at all. In a few days it is possible, but unlikely.
Hey, you! Yeah, you behind the computer screen! You're unconstitutional.
America == Velociraptor
Play IRC mafia. (/join #mafia)
Be careful of bastard modding, guys.
Remember, "The Exile" was a townie.
It's quite possible that "The Assassin" is also town - although if the assassin is, in fact, our retard vig, we should probably lynch him anyways
OK.. I can live with that. I guess I saw stuff which may or may not have been there. The way I read it was sort of like you were saying "armin or pibbly... hmmm.... vote armin." Why did you vote him anyway? Do you think he is today's lynch? Do you not understand why lynching the neutral is bad?
Oh, and we are all lynch targets. Even me.
I accept the explanation, but I'd still like to know why you voted.
_______________________________
[L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
Are you trying to give your scum buddy clues as to how to claim? It sounds there like you know what's about to happen, and you're trying to pre-explain it away.
Chimp is going to have to either try and explain away a suspicious name or else get into a counterclaim fight with one of me, DYH, Fayul or Sutherlands.
He's going to do this in his own words.
Anyone else trying to give him some assistance in doing this is either scum or being an incredibly bad townie by letting him out of explaining himself.
I want to see Chimp talk (because I think he's cornered scum), and I want to see Pibbly talk (because I think he's lurking lurking scum). Since Fayul has no report today, I think that's the plan. If Pibbly and Chimp are both convincing, I'll rethink. I think the odds at this point are strongly against both of them being town, though.
Re Sutherlands:
Without a counterclaim, I am 100% unwilling to lynch Sutherlands. End of story.
It occurs to me that we now have a doc out and a cop out and it's day 4 and we still haven't seen what superpower justifies bertrand's claimed restriction. And he just tried to lay suspicion on a non-counterclaimed doc.
There's something to look out for when we do our mass claim (which will probably occur sooner rather than later).
Didn't like Bertrand's last sets of posts, either. Becoming very suspicious of roles that "have to be somewhere", as to Raf's point- all the traditional power roles are pretty well out.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Hey, you! Yeah, you behind the computer screen! You're unconstitutional.
America == Velociraptor
Play IRC mafia. (/join #mafia)
3CB and 4CB5CB!Pibbly PBPA
#9 - Random vote; nothing to see here.
#203 - Now with 200% more fence sitting. Says loran's foses are "odd." Says he is confused by "this entire Sutherland thing" and doesn't commit to any opinion one way or the other.
#323 - Now that fade and CP have backpedaled after realizing Sutherlands' role, Pibbly says he thinks Sutherlands is town. Fishes for an explicit statement of why they backed off Sutherlands.
#355 - Takes the middle ground on whether or not we should use foses. Says he thinks CP and fade are scummy for the about-face on Sutherlands, but says he'll drop it because nobody else seems interested (!).
#481 - Says he believes Nom Anor's claim. Does not commit to whether or not he'll go to the docks, saying he will choose randomly. Expresses support for the UVP wagon, but refuses to place his own vote (!).
#550 - Now commits to non-docks.
#646 - Votes UVP (in spirit), though for reasons other people had already stated. Encourages case against Zchinque.
#647 - Actually votes UVP.
#704 - Reposts list of where people are going at night. I have no idea what he intended by his "it should be an interesting night" comment, but I don’t like it. It feels like he knew more than he should.
#747 - Posts list of people at ale house. Says Nom_Anor being blocked seems logical, but then gives a totally nonsensical reason as to why. Is anti-loran.
#811 - Sort of claims some kind of information role. Seems to be against Nom_Anor, but jabs CP's credibility as well.
And post 992, yeh can read above.
So what we've got is a pattern o' rampant lurking, fence-sitting, votes and general casting of suspicion against townies, several rehashes of information which teh me feel like attempts to score townie points with contributing, and some vague allusions to possibly having extra information.
Vote Pibbly. Down to the depths with ya, yeh scurvy dog.
3CB and 4CB5CB!V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
It's not much of a superpower, and it's not much of a restriction.
What?
This sounds exactly like what could easliy be the flavor for being scum... please explain yourself a bit better.
You guys are jumping on the lurker, but reading his posts it's extremely hard to tell his alignment. Mostly because there are so few of them. But I don't like this case.. this is NOT the time to hunt lurkers. Arimnaes seems to have proceeded with a rather unsual method of science (which I see a lot of in PBPAs, and am guilty of myself), and that is to reach a conclusion (that Pibbly is scum), and the find evidence to support it.
_______________________________
[L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
_______________________________
[L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
OK.
So you're going to say something now, right? Because apologizing for not speaking means nothing if you then continue to not speak.
Oh, and Chimp.... well, your claim would mean cp was inventing BOTH of the dodgiest names there, "Assassin" and "Usurper" both. Also, I have only two words in my name, but cp's list backs me up that Chancellor is a second word and also I'm just... The Chancellor because there is only one Chancellor in the kingdom, and it's me. I am THE Chancellor. Why do you only have two words in your name?
Or are you, in fact, "The Bastard Usurper"? Fitting much more with cp's list and with the naming conventions in this game?
Not to mention that even the way you've described "The Bastard" sounds like you left out the bit where you've come to take over the Kingdom ahead of the rightful heir.
vote Chimpanzee, but this may change to Pibbly if Pibbly doesn't talk convincingly. I think both of them are very strong targets.
Look at the first post in the thread. It explains quite clearly who the scum are:
Doesn't this sound like what Cimp described? Something in that flavor claim is ringing alarm bells. I want to hear from Chimp. Clarify please.
_______________________________
[L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
Chief Footman - I am essentially the head butler
I have two abilities. The first is i am a roleblocker.
The second is that if there are more traitors than crown in the location i stay at, then i recieve notice of this. My pm also alluded to the fact that the Royal Chef was a miller for my ability, as it says that i hate him, but believe him to be loyal.
I have only used my RB once, on Wrath of Dog, on night 2, the one where he died.
My second ability was the main reason that i didnt want to stay at the
docks the first night. There was no chance that if i went there, that it would trigger. I was also attempting find the Chef at the ale house (hoping for some sort of food connection, making him go to the alehouse). This would make the chance of getting a positive result greater. And the ability has never triggered.
Thats all for my claim.
Could you give us a wrap-up of who's been in your location each night?
Also, who do you think is scummiest at the moment (and why)?
arimnaes
Pibbly
Salubrious
Wuffles_II
Night 2
Kenji
Pibbly
Chimpanzee
Wuffles_II
Night 3
Wuffles_II
Pibbly
Moving back to Uni today, will have longer post about scummy people then (that takes too long)
_______________________________
[L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
Post summaries:
arimnaes - 44
bertrand - 41
Chimpanzee - 27
Disrupt_Your_Hymn - 71
Fayul - 25
Pibbly - 14
RafaelK - 87
Salubrious - 22
Sutherlands - 103
Wuffles_II - 29
_______________________________
[L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
Hey, you! Yeah, you behind the computer screen! You're unconstitutional.
America == Velociraptor
Play IRC mafia. (/join #mafia)
"Ladies and gentlemen, the town crier !"
A small boy with a trumpet then blows a fanfare as TC himself makes his grand entrance.
"Hear Ye, Hear Ye ! Sergeant Bob takes over city watch. Crime down by fifty percent !"
The people don't mind old news so long as it's good news. They crowd around TC to hear the voting summary...
Pibbly: Disrupt_Your_Hymn, bertrand, arimnaes, Chimpanzee, Sutherlands
Chimpanzee: RafaelK
(I'm on on this site much anymore. If you want to get in touch it's probably best to email me: dom@heffalumps.org)
Forum Awards: Best Writer 2005, Best Limited Strategist 2005-2012
5CB PotM - June 2005, November 2005, February 2006, April 2008, May 2008, Feb 2009
MTGSalvation Articles: 1-20, plus guest appearance on MTGCast #86!
<Limited Clan>
Now, we just need to get to our discussion. Someone please unvote pibbly pro tempore so we don't have another axel situation.
I'll be going Outside the City walls tonight. Chimpanzee will be following me. In addition, other people can go if they like: I need at least 1 other person to go, because Chimp needs to be lynched if he doesn't show up, and I might not make it alive, or the mafia's moving ability might go to more than one place.
_______________________________
[L1 Judge|Add me to your ignore list]
|Molten Sentry count - 1002 (34*)|
I am going to go back and verify what Sutherlands is saying about Bertrand for myself. If that's truly the case, we need to take a hard look at him. I'm already suspicious of his injection of himself into today's proceedings so heavily after being a relative non-factor up for the past few days. Not to mention that if the ability isn't that great, I don't understand not joining the rest of us at the docks, or why it was such a big fiasco day one about voting/fosing him.
Now for everyone else:
Arimnaes I've written off as neutral, but could be scum hiding behind that claim. Great vig target if we have one left.
It's pretty apparent that Chimp is lying about his name to me, honestly. I'm between him and Bertrand for likely SK.
Fayul is clear as the cop.
Pibbly's behavior is terrible, and it's awfully suspicious that he can get back in time to put in a location but not contribute. I wouldn't be upset to put my votes back here once we've exhausted discussion if nothing comes of it.
RafK has been a lot less aggressive than usual this game, but in his last two games where he played that way he had an investigative role which he could use to back up his assertions and that's clearly not the case here.
I mentioned my unease about Salubrious, and it'd be nice to hear some more from him. To review, volunteering that Fayul and others were missing from the Docks was helpful, but as I stated earlier, could be a misdirection ploy. He was also so helpful as to guide UVP (to his credit who did turn up town) on how not to answer my question day one against my clear instruction.
Sutherlands is clear as the doc.
I'm pretty neutral on Wuffles II; aside from his non-participation at the Docks, he hasn't done anything notable.
That's all for now.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Plus, Pibbly's claimed ability is really weak. I notice looking down his claimed list that the only thing he could know from his ability is that arim, salubrious and wuffles can't all be scum together. He needs to be with more people than that to learn anything, but never bothered trying to do so (coughdockscough).
So I'm agreeable with taking out Pibbly before Chimp. They were the two people on my list, after all.
Strongly agree with Fayul and Chimp going Beyond The City Walls to try and inspect Chimp. We might well see a repeat performance, but on the same token it's possible that Fayul's theory is right or that Pibbly is the scum kidnapper. Can but try.
Looking over DYH's list, I more or less agree with his summing up. I would add that I don't regard DYH as being quite as clear as many do. His quad-vote conveniently went missing after 1 day, and people had relied on that to clear him. Plus he seems to have a slightly iffy rolename, and thus far rolenames do seem to be a little important.
You mean "Beyond the City Walls", right?
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Yes.
Unless anyone else has something I'm comfortable with the lynch here.
FoS: Chimpanzee
FoS: Bertrand
Vote: Bertrand
Vote: Pibbly
Let's see how many kills there are tomorrow now.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
Id really like to know exactly what Bertrand has been hiding all this time. It seems that he has gone with the ploy and has not really produced much else all game. I think that its time he spill the beans. As sutherland also pointed out, there was an extra kill the night no one voted bertrand. Coincedence?
Also, what ever happened with Sutherland's training? did that ever get completed? Im really curious about that as its day four, with no evidence that it happened. So im curious there.
Also, there is Saliburus. Not sure what to say about him, but he just seems off to me. Im not going to go over posts and point out exactly what it is, because really, im not sure. Just a gut feeling.
That all i really have to say. Towns about to get very close to losing.....
Also, Sutherlands already answered this.
He's the doctor.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
I was sent to the castle with a love letter from the king to my mother. Each night I can choose a player, and if I'm in a location alone with that player I can reveal the letter to that player, verifying my identity to that player (gamewise they receive my role name and allegiance from the mod) so you don't need to waste the investigation on me as long as someone volunteers to go to a location alone with me.
I really don't quite get flavorfully why my role is town, but it is listed as it and I can easily prove it.
3CB and 4CB5CB!Since Chimp seems to be able to self-validate, I'd like Bertrand and Salubrious to come Beyond the City Walls.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
One wonders, if you can reveal your identity and allegiance to a player every night and most people have committed to a location every night (allowing you to easily pick someone out to talk) why you have to ask to confirm yourself tonight rather than, say, pointing to someone you've already told.
Smells of last ditch effort.
I think I disagree with Salubrious and bertrand going to Beyond the City Walls. If there's a scum ability that needs to be in the same place as the townie it's used on, let's limit the amount of people sharing with Fayul tonight. Chimp and DYH is sufficient.
V/LA: 3/21-3/24 & 3/27-3/29
3CB and 4CB5CB!This makes it even more important:
ONLY FAYUL, CHIMP AND DYH are to be BEYOND THE CITY WALLS.
I'm going to add something else, at this point, since I'm worried and I'm starting to want my ability to be available if I need it. My ability requires me to able to research in the library undisturbed. Hence-
STAY AWAY FROM THE LIBRARY.
By kingcobweb and Goblinboy.
Official Elitist of [thread=40859][RBS][/thread]