Well, this is kind of why polytheism is fun, no need to choose. Having to pick one individual one to rule everything just seems kind of like a bad idea anyways, the world is too diverse for one "ruler" in that sense.
It's a god. You can just define it as being capable of handling that much diversity.
I think you can, but I don't like the concept especially, it doesn't feel fitting for how things are. *shrugs* But it's all a matter of perception really.
I'm an atheist, but I would say the basic deistic god is the most reasonable, since it carries no extra intellectual baggage.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
BRGMy Deck(Modern): Bolts'n'Burns WMy other, WIP casual deck: Zero to Hero
Protection from Will-O'-the-Wisps, Ali-from-Cairos, and Uncle-Istvans
Legendary snow landwalk
---------------------------------------
On the reserved list: Wizards won't remove it. Only we can. In other words: Play Modern, Pauper, or No-RL Eternal.
I'm an atheist, but I would say the basic deistic god is the most reasonable, since it carries no extra intellectual baggage.
I mean, that's basically the same as saying there is no god, which seems kind of... moot for the purposes of this theoretical argument unless you are theistic already.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I think you can, but I don't like the concept especially, it doesn't feel fitting for how things are. *shrugs* But it's all a matter of perception really.
WMy other, WIP casual deck: Zero to Hero
Protection from Will-O'-the-Wisps, Ali-from-Cairos, and Uncle-Istvans
Legendary snow landwalk
---------------------------------------
On the reserved list: Wizards won't remove it. Only we can. In other words: Play Modern, Pauper, or No-RL Eternal.
I mean, that's basically the same as saying there is no god, which seems kind of... moot for the purposes of this theoretical argument unless you are theistic already.