On the subject of sentient cards, the original wording of Floral Spuzzem implied that it made the decision, not you.
"If Floral Spuzzem attacks an opponent and is not blocked, then Floral Spuzzem may choose to destroy a target artifact under that opponent's control and deal no damage."
If a card can "own you" then it should have the ability to make decisions for you. Maybe "Outer Being controls your turns."
The Dunwich Horror lolz.. there are magic creatures that are scarier than that... anyway it's nice, but I think the "Outer Beign owns you" just makes it look like an UN card, and that wasn't my intention.. And "nobody owns Outer Being" would cause too many issues. It should defintally be "You can't have Outer Beign in your deck".
Since the art is pretty vertical, it's difficult to get it in a cardframe right.
This is the best I could make off it:
And I fixed the text, is it ok this way?
I tried some other arts. I'm not entirely satisfied. The first one was also quite vertical, and the humans in the art do not really fit. The second one looks very black, but who cares.
The text is still wrong, as 0 is a number. What's wrong with "You can't have Outer Beign in your deck"?
The opposite from reletless rats is wrong.
Saying "A deck can't have any number of cards named Outer Being" essentially says
1. You can't have copies of outer beign in your deck.
2. You must have Outer Being in you deck.
Since zero is a number, it also read "you can't have zero copies of Outer Beign in your deck". And if you can't have zero, then you must have more, but you can't. It's a paradox.
Reletness Rats' text doesn't creates any paradox. The opposite does, and it would cause too many problems.
If a card can "own you" then it should have the ability to make decisions for you. Maybe "Outer Being controls your turns."
ABSOLUTELY NOT.
I like it like this:
Outer Entity
Creature {S}
~ isn't colorless.
~'s power and toughness are each infinite.
~ is not a spell.
~ owns you. (You still control it.)
*/*
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
avy by spiderboy4
Standard
:symg::symu::symb:BUG Troll Aggro:symb::symu::symg:
:symg::symw::symb:Junk Aristocrats:symb::symw::symg: Modern
:symu::symw::symr:American Illuminatus Control:symr::symw::symu:
:xmana::xmana::xmana:Robots:xmana::xmana::xmana: Vintage
:symg::symu::symr:RUG Gush:symr::symu::symg: EDH
:symw::symg::symr:Rith, the Token Maker:symr::symg::symw:
:symg::symb:Jarad, Golgari Aristocrat:symb::symg:
If you put it that way, it works only while it's in play.
There's a rule stating that any ability works only when it's in play unless it could only work somewhere else. If that's the case, then it works wherever it needs to work. There are numerous examples of this. See Panglacial Wurm, every pitch spell, and most graveyard abilities. Note also that Relentless Rats has an ability that only affects deck construction. So, "~ can't be in a deck" is a fine template for a card that you want to be accessible only through wishes and only in casual. That isn't what Outer Being is, but it is compatible with the rules.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from Horseshoe Hermit »
Karma doesn't exist. You can't depend on it. If you count on it for justice or catharsis, you will find that you have placed your emotions on very unstable ground; and you will either repeat your disappointment in society over and over, or you will engage in a persistent delusion to protect yourself from that feeling.
But I don't want it to be in the sideboard as well.. I don't think that if a card reads "~ can't be in a deck" then it's allowed to put it in the sideboard.. it would be just like putting a banned card in your sideboard..
umm... why can't you have banned cards in your sideboard? it seams perfectly fair as long as you can't sideboard them in (banned cards can't be in your deck)
BTW, I lol'd at the "Outter Beign owns you" thing, nice one..
p.s. it would be cool if somone would render this card into a template that's a combination of all the colors+artifact, and also put a wicked cool art.
Give me a week...
I'll need a futureshift PSD template though if you know where I can get one.
It's still not colorless, and has no color. That's a paradox. So either you're a Zen master or an idiot, I'll assume the Zen master for sake of argument. This card will have no paradoxes because it has a clear paradox. Deep stuff man.
If a deck can't have any number of cards, it's a pradox since 0 is a number, and if a deck can't have 0 copies of a card in the deck, then it must have more.. but it can't.
Here's the new text:
Outer Being
Creautre R
Outer Beign isn't colorless.
Outer Being's power and thoughness are infinite.
Outer Beign can't be in a game. "Such powerful entity would never respound to such weak only-immortals as ourselves." -Book of Planeswalkers
∞/∞
I think this is the best template; no more arguments about sideboard (as it's also a part of a game) and no paradoxes.
It's still not colorless, and has no color. That's a paradox. So either you're a Zen master or an idiot, I'll assume the Zen master for sake of argument. This card will have no paradoxes because it has a clear paradox. Deep stuff man.
Outer Being
Creautre R
Outer Beign isn't colorless.
Outer Being's power and thoughness are infinite.
Outer Beign can't be in a game. "Such powerful entity would never respound to such weak only-immortals as ourselves." -Book of Planeswalkers
∞/∞
I think this is the best template; no more arguments about sideboard (as it's also a part of a game) and no paradoxes.
It's still not colorless, and has no color. That's a paradox. So either you're a Zen master or an idiot, I'll assume the Zen master for sake of argument. This card will have no paradoxes because it has a clear paradox. Deep stuff man.
It's still not colorless, and has no color. That's a paradox. So either you're a Zen master or an idiot, I'll assume the Zen master for sake of argument. This card will have no paradoxes because it has a clear paradox. Deep stuff man.
It's still not colorless, and has no color. That's a paradox. So either you're a Zen master or an idiot, I'll assume the Zen master for sake of argument. This card will have no paradoxes because it has a clear paradox. Deep stuff man.
It's not a color of the five magic colors, not ir colorless. It's a color not known to man nor to plainswalker.
o_o;
Great. Now we need to make Magic AI.
LOLz
Augustin, Rasputin, Bruna, Brago, Ojutai
Augustin, Rasputin, Bruna, Brago, Ojutai
The text is still wrong, as 0 is a number. What's wrong with "You can't have Outer Beign in your deck"?
Saying "A deck can't have any number of cards named Outer Being" essentially says
1. You can't have copies of outer beign in your deck.
2. You must have Outer Being in you deck.
Since zero is a number, it also read "you can't have zero copies of Outer Beign in your deck". And if you can't have zero, then you must have more, but you can't. It's a paradox.
Reletness Rats' text doesn't creates any paradox. The opposite does, and it would cause too many problems.
ABSOLUTELY NOT.
I like it like this:
Outer Entity
Creature {S}
~ isn't colorless.
~'s power and toughness are each infinite.
~ is not a spell.
~ owns you. (You still control it.)
*/*
:symg::symu::symb:BUG Troll Aggro:symb::symu::symg:
:symg::symw::symb:Junk Aristocrats:symb::symw::symg:
Modern
:symu::symw::symr:American Illuminatus Control:symr::symw::symu:
:xmana::xmana::xmana:Robots:xmana::xmana::xmana:
Vintage
:symg::symu::symr:RUG Gush:symr::symu::symg:
EDH
:symw::symg::symr:Rith, the Token Maker:symr::symg::symw:
:symg::symb:Jarad, Golgari Aristocrat:symb::symg:
don't ever click here or here
There's a rule stating that any ability works only when it's in play unless it could only work somewhere else. If that's the case, then it works wherever it needs to work. There are numerous examples of this. See Panglacial Wurm, every pitch spell, and most graveyard abilities. Note also that Relentless Rats has an ability that only affects deck construction. So, "~ can't be in a deck" is a fine template for a card that you want to be accessible only through wishes and only in casual. That isn't what Outer Being is, but it is compatible with the rules.
About Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx:
Also, can I use a copy of a token?
Butcher of Words.
Made by Spiderboy4
Give me a week...
I'll need a futureshift PSD template though if you know where I can get one.
The only colour with a 99/99
Signature by Spongy Pengwin
UBR: Sedris
Here's the new text:
Outer Being
Creautre R
Outer Beign isn't colorless.
Outer Being's power and thoughness are infinite.
Outer Beign can't be in a game.
"Such powerful entity would never respound to such weak only-immortals as ourselves." -Book of Planeswalkers
∞/∞
I think this is the best template; no more arguments about sideboard (as it's also a part of a game) and no paradoxes.
The only colour with a 99/99
Signature by Spongy Pengwin
UBR: Sedris
It's still not colorless, and has no color. That's a paradox. So either you're a Zen master or an idiot, I'll assume the Zen master for sake of argument. This card will have no paradoxes because it has a clear paradox. Deep stuff man.
The only colour with a 99/99
Signature by Spongy Pengwin
UBR: Sedris
It's not a color of the five magic colors, not ir colorless. It's a color not known to man nor to plainswalker.
you know, cost something like 3pppp and have no purple producing lands?