I seriously hope that was a joke.....cuz he's far better than Garruk Relentless.
Garruk acted as removal. Garruk protected himself in the same way. Garruk then made 1/1 deathtouchers, which are easily better than 2/2s with Haste. Garruk then tutored for your best creatures, and won you the game.
This guy maybe can make some mana, but will likely just be a GR bitterblossom.
Garruk acted as removal. Garruk protected himself in the same way. Garruk then made 1/1 deathtouchers, which are easily better than 2/2s with Haste. Garruk then tutored for your best creatures, and won you the game.
This guy maybe can make some mana, but will likely just be a GR bitterblossom.
Shall we open an extra Thread for "Garruk VS Xenagos" ?
No is just want to join this discussion in whos better of them.
oK so first i find Xenagos´ Tokens better. Even the better than the deathtouch-ones (they are just too defensive for me)
Not every Deck benefits from Xenagos´ Cradle-ability. You have to work with Cards such as Bonfire of the damned, Mizzium Mortars, Kessig Wolf Run & some more Cards like that.
i playtested him a lot & have to agree with you. The +1 is MOST of the time too conditional & useless. But then you just get Tokens, which synergize with his Cradle-ability for later spells or X-cost opportunities like Kessig Wolf Run. if happened often enough that his lil Satyr becomes a 10/2 Trampler & more. if you have the opportunity getting to VERY MUCH Mana & dont know what to do with it, then you should Play such manasinks.
Then again; this ability Needs a Deck to be build around to become deadly.
People seem to think; Throw Xenagos in any Deck & just win with The Cradle-ability, as i watched this thread.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I seriously hope that was a joke.....cuz he's far better than Garruk Relentless.
New to Commander? Read the Above article.
I can see this guy being played with Anger of the Gods as a nice G/R deck. Maybe it's just me though
Garruk acted as removal. Garruk protected himself in the same way. Garruk then made 1/1 deathtouchers, which are easily better than 2/2s with Haste. Garruk then tutored for your best creatures, and won you the game.
This guy maybe can make some mana, but will likely just be a GR bitterblossom.
Shall we open an extra Thread for "Garruk VS Xenagos" ?
No is just want to join this discussion in whos better of them.
oK so first i find Xenagos´ Tokens better. Even the better than the deathtouch-ones (they are just too defensive for me)
Not every Deck benefits from Xenagos´ Cradle-ability. You have to work with Cards such as Bonfire of the damned, Mizzium Mortars, Kessig Wolf Run & some more Cards like that.
i playtested him a lot & have to agree with you. The +1 is MOST of the time too conditional & useless. But then you just get Tokens, which synergize with his Cradle-ability for later spells or X-cost opportunities like Kessig Wolf Run. if happened often enough that his lil Satyr becomes a 10/2 Trampler & more. if you have the opportunity getting to VERY MUCH Mana & dont know what to do with it, then you should Play such manasinks.
Then again; this ability Needs a Deck to be build around to become deadly.
People seem to think; Throw Xenagos in any Deck & just win with The Cradle-ability, as i watched this thread.